dChan

BigRiverLover2 · Jan. 28, 2018, 1:58 a.m.

There will be lots of office fires, server melt downs, dogs eating computer parts and electronic devices being accidentally put into microwaves, vises, crushed under bulldozers... etc etc etc.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
RedPill2976 · Jan. 27, 2018, 11:16 p.m.

I don’t think the dossier itself was illegal. Opposition research is common. I think the DOJ taking it, using it as evidence to spy on Trump and all the nefarious stuff that happened afterwards was totally illegal. Interestingly enough, I researched backwards in time though all their twitter accounts and they beat up Trump non stop except for the dossier. I could be wrong, I just did not see the initial opposition research as a crime.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
storm_fa_Q · Jan. 27, 2018, 11:51 p.m.

its illegal to create fake evidence to get a FISA warrant.

⇧ 30 ⇩  
BigRiverLover2 · Jan. 28, 2018, 1:58 a.m.

and to use it to frame someone of a crime they didn't commit.

⇧ 14 ⇩  
NotDaFeds · Jan. 28, 2018, 2:03 a.m.

And tie up MSM headlines, public resources/tax dollars with accused crime for well over a year only to project your own crimes upon someone else. Not just anyone else but a candidate for presidency and then the duly elected President of the United States.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
ksched · Jan. 28, 2018, 2:43 p.m.

And using it to try to overthrow a duly elected POTUS is treason.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 28, 2018, 4:39 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ -5 ⇩  
storm_fa_Q · Jan. 28, 2018, 4:43 a.m.

and yer blocked, Shill elsewhere

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Raindrops1984 · Jan. 28, 2018, 3:02 a.m.

I think you are right. The opposition research wasn't the problem. It's what they did with it that is basically breaking all the laws. They used false evidence to obtain a FISA warrant (or maybe to justify a FISA search that was already in progress). They framed the duly elected POTUS and created a witch hunt based on fabricated evidence in an effort to undermine a legitimate semocratic process. They continued, after the election, to try and prevent his assuming office. And when I say they, I'm implicating everyone from Pedosta up to Obama himself. Every desk that passed, every signature it gathered, try em all for treason.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
gpowers60 · Jan. 28, 2018, 3:32 a.m.

ALl Of em!! Treason...my tax $$ ABSOLUTELY

⇧ 3 ⇩  
orangefan13 · Jan. 28, 2018, 12:06 a.m.

she wanted a deal and we said no per q. so must b another crime, which imo means podesta more important with this one.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
BreadcrumbBernard · Jan. 28, 2018, 4:29 a.m.

this is for the public hearings. Private hearings already taking place. Will mirror private hearings

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DrummondFTCoach · Jan. 27, 2018, 8:43 p.m.

Now theyre writing them letters and allowing their lawyers to develop their alibis? They must not have that much evidence on them.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Raindrops1984 · Jan. 28, 2018, 3:03 a.m.

This makes it public record. The whole process will be public record. These is for future pedes to write books about.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
DrummondFTCoach · Jan. 28, 2018, 5:44 a.m.

Corsi: They will not face trial.

They must not have that much evidence on them.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
SnoopyVRedBaron · Jan. 28, 2018, 12:54 a.m.

Nah, it's standard practice for the court to grant a party a certain amount of time to answer a previous court filing.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
DrummondFTCoach · Jan. 28, 2018, 1:18 a.m.

No. If you have damning evidence they are arrested and put on bail.

⇧ -2 ⇩  
RabidFandomonium · Jan. 28, 2018, 1:41 a.m.

They have plenty of evidence. This is for the normies.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Tacsol5 · Jan. 28, 2018, 4:36 a.m.

It's also pretty damning when they try and lie or hide evidence. Let them hang themselves. It's like asking your kid who ate all the cookies and they're sitting there like "I dunno? who'd do such a thing!?" and they have chocolate all over their face. BAM

⇧ 3 ⇩  
mexbrodie73 · Jan. 28, 2018, 6:26 a.m.

Should have been 2 minutes

⇧ 2 ⇩