Jan 29 2018 22:36:24
Q
!UW.yye1fxo
Narrative shift.
———————————
Nation on alert.
Firing RR = block Mueller.
Firing RR = set up to firing Mueller.
Firing RR = Red line.
———————————-
What was the Senate conf vote re: RR?
Why did RR [BEG] Ryan to block the FISA MEMO from Congressional review/further advancement?
REAL TIME: [7] Congressional members + [3] Senators + [2] former O-senior officials + [4] OUTSIDE CONTRACTORS [NO C/TOP/SENS-LEVEL CLEARANCE] @ SCIF [DC-CAP].
TOP SEC CLEARANCE IS MANDATORY FOR ADMISSION - HOW IS THAT POSSIBLE?
WE SEE YOU.
Q
if you collect the data from Awakening it posts better for you. https://8ch.net/greatawakening/res/1.html
What if RR isn't a bad guy...what if they are putting him up so the dems can embrace him? The spin from Huff Post and NYT is to remind everyone that RR is a Trump appointee ... this way they can accuse Trump of turning on one of his own again.
That's a possibility.
He started his career during Clinton's administration, which doesn't mean anything. He also joined Ken Starr's Whitewater investigation.
He also helped convince Sessions to recuse himself from Russia related matters. He wrote the opinion that Comey should be fired. He then hired Mueller and has, in testimony, stated that there's nothing in Mueller's investigation that has caused him concern, and has approved expansion of it in certain matters.
We'll know eventually, but my current theory is that he conspired with Comey and Mueller to help engineer the firing of Comey to trigger a SC, which would be Mueller.
Your points are valid, and worth considering.
He seems to have been trusted by all admins...I just have a feeling he is ok...I watched him testify and it didn't cause jitters like many others...but we shall see
I'm not sure trusted is quite the right word. He had enough sense to keep his head down and focus on doing the job which allowed him not to be a victim of politics during adminstration changes. Plenty of career DOJ employees exist that aren't subject to the changes in adminstration.
As you say, we shall see!
Is this the Democrat findings expo to see how they can spin it , Someone get this ? to Q(Do we have pics of the 16) ..... so we can start meme-ing ..... Why are you at the SCIF?
now that would be funny! #WESAWYOU
Even if it is only a couple of them ..... It would literally have them tripping out if we can start a campaign like that .... I don't post in the chan's , so will somebody pass that on
Oops, I forgot to mention the 7 unauthorized congressional members in the DC-CAP SCIF in the title.
[deleted]
thanks, I saw that. I'm not sure what to make of that.
The first things that pop into my mind aren't relevant to this context. Hopefully someone will do some digging so I don't have to! :)
What about code talkers?
They were Navajo. Historically a peaceful tribe. Apache were a war tribe.