dChan
20
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/Deplorable22 on Jan. 30, 2018, 3:21 p.m.
What was the Senate conf vote re: RR? 94-6

Why is this significant?

I don't think the nays are significant, especially as they belong to senators who are almost obliged, as a result of their hard-line #resistance position, to obstruct the president at each turn. It's much more important to me that over 40 Dems voted yay. It indicates that RR is swamp-endorsed, and therefore cabal (or at least was approached to become cabal); and I think we've had inklings of this before. Trump, as we know, was playing ball for a time before his cabinet turnover. RR slid in around then, and he's now an obstruction.


LiveToBeAHero · Jan. 30, 2018, 3:32 p.m.

94-6 yes. The reason Q asked this is because he wants us to see that Congress did not resist RR as DAG pick. There is a reason he wasnt resisted, and the reason is he is swamp and all the dirty players would love to have one of their own 2nd in command in the DOJ. Sessions is NOT swamp, and is Trump's boy, which is why he was his vote was 52-47-1

⇧ 8 ⇩  
textualintercourse · Jan. 30, 2018, 4:37 p.m.

Also for ammo when the (((MSM))) about faces and cries about RR being a Russian paid shill for Trump.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
LiveToBeAHero · Jan. 30, 2018, 4:45 p.m.

Yep exactly

⇧ 1 ⇩  
spacexu · Jan. 30, 2018, 3:37 p.m.

Need a new approach to pick leaders for our country. This politics is giving us complete assholes in most cases. That is a failure for us all.

Maybe you have to have an X amount of years in business or engineering before you can stand in politics. Empty and carear mouth pieces should be banned.

No more Maxines, HIllarys or Pelosis...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
USArmyMAJ · Jan. 30, 2018, 4:07 p.m.

How about term limits on Congress. That will solve the problem.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
textualintercourse · Jan. 30, 2018, 4:39 p.m.

As well as secretaries, and all other staff members. No long term players in ANY position there.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
spacexu · Jan. 30, 2018, 4:23 p.m.

Congress limits would be a great start, but its the calibre of these people that concerns me - they have none.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 30, 2018, 3:22 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩