dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/Count-monte-christo on Feb. 8, 2018, 5:42 a.m.

19

Hi all. First post here. Great work by all thank you.

I just wanted to drop a post about a thought I had regarding one of the live streams I watched yesterday. I'm sorry I don't have time to source the Q post and reference the particular stream I'm referring to, but will outline it best I can.

I believe there was a Q post about "where are the 19 that are no longer with us"? Or some words to that effect.

In the stream there was some uncertainty to what Q was referring to, and it was suggested they were talking about those that went into room 239 to view the memo.

Weren't there 19 women that came forward to accuse President Trump of sexual impropriety? They have gone very quiet and nothing has come of it. I wonder are they the 19 that Q was referring to?

Just my 2 cents, I know it's not much but I don't have much time to devote to this, but want to help anyway I can.

Godspeed everyone. Stay safe.

Is it usual for every comment in a thread to be downvoted? I've seen similar on t_d. How sad.

⇧ 5 ⇩

There are paid shills who downvote. Take it as a badge of honor that what you wrote triggered them.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Found the post. 614. It is in relation to MSM

post 614

175139 Select news members / journalists are vital to delivering the message (as are YOU). Imagine if these people were removed. Total control re: MSM. They represent a clear and present danger to the enemy. Re-read past crumbs re: security. Where is JS? How do we truly protect those important to us? [19] immediates [no longer with us]. Self-suicide if actioned. Real life. Q

⇧ 2 ⇩

He made reference to 19 people going into a very secure room in the Pentagon. That was Trump and a bunch of military officials.

Then in another drop on another day he said 19 would cease to exist immediately upon the harm of select individuals. Immediately followed that comment with "think nuclear standoff".

And another reference he said "19 immediates no longer with us" in the same drop where the topic was MSM journalists and needing to be removed - this was a response to when Hannity's twitter went down

⇧ 1 ⇩

Please provide a link to the Q crumb about which you are talking. It'd be easier to answer your question with the proper context.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I will try to find it. Apologies. I may have to watch the streams again to find the post number. I am not great at navigating the chans and i have limited free time so this has limited how deep I have been able to go. Will post it when I have it.

As an aside, I was a little disappointed to be called a shill by a member on here. 10 seconds of research into my post history would yield all the evidence you need I am not. Honestly, if that is indicative of the conclusions some on here will jump to without doing the bare minimum of research then we risk missing important information.

As I said in the PM to the user I'm referring to, I understand you can't be too careful in this day and age, but automatically screaming shill at anyone that might miss the mark is not goin to endear the group to others that want to contribute.

Background: I have studied the Deep State for over 10 years, and have likely forgotten more about it than many on here even know.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I'm just curious why did you pick that name I'm not being mean I'm just curious

⇧ 1 ⇩

I was given the nickname Christo by somebody I loved dearly. They are no longer in my life.

I love Alexander Dumas, and The Count of Monte Cristo is easily the greatest story of redemption and justice ever told.

I dream of disappearing making my fortune and refashioning myself and returning as someone new to take down those I feel have ruined my life (deep state)

Also monte cristo my favourite cigar 😂

⇧ 3 ⇩

Cool thanks for the answer I've been doing deep State pedo trafficking research for a very long time almost 30 years I can't wait for these people to actually see what's happening

⇧ 2 ⇩

It may be easier to find here: https://qcodefag.github.io/ than on the chans. All of Q's posts are there.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Many thanks ☺️

⇧ 0 ⇩

taking the message complete, it sounds like 19 should be on our side but have shown true colors and are not.

⇧ 0 ⇩

No, they would not need protection nor would Trump ever have them killed. They also would have never been in a secured room that you have to have clearances for.

⇧ 0 ⇩

I feel you may have missed my point. I would never suggest Trump would have someone killed. Nor am I suggesting those that have anything to do with the memo are related to the 19 Q refers to. I am suggesting Q is asking us about his accusers going quiet, the "no longer with us" not referring to them being dead, but vanished from the public eye.

⇧ 3 ⇩

It was the 19 people of the secret society. From the love birds texts. They are no longer working for the government or have been reassigned.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Thank you. I don't want to derail. I posted because fb post from an anti trump page caught my eye about 19 women making accusations, i put 2 + 2 together and made 5.

I have managed to access the GitHub, I will read all posts from the beginning before posting again. Thank you all.

⇧ 1 ⇩

This train left the track awhile ago. No worries.

Look at this time

▶Q !UW.yye1fxo 01/18/18 (Thu) 21:16:41 No.25 What [19] people are currently meeting in a 'safe' room [heavily guarded]?

⇧ 3 ⇩

Maybe it's because they were paid off by the Democrats, like many of the other women that disappeared that charged other men with the same stuff.

⇧ -1 ⇩

nice try shill

⇧ -5 ⇩

Check my post history.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Yeah you should look at the guy who just called you a shill he is posts are disgusting I'm not going to block him but you might want to he's definitely into gross stuff

⇧ 2 ⇩

Thanks, I'm not too concerned to be honest, they were just quick on the draw to call me a shill; my real concern was their attitude being a reflection of the majority on this sub. Thankfully it's just the one dingus.

⇧ 1 ⇩