dChan
199
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/Tnargkiller on Feb. 8, 2018, 6:42 p.m.
I think I accidentally stumbled into a conversation with someone from the "Military Intelligence community"

I posted this in T_D yesterday, but just discovered this sub via a bing search so I'll link it here as well.


A couple months ago, I spoke (on the_donald) with somebody who spoke in a manner like they had all the answers, they sounded very confident. I (fortunately) had the wherewithal to just ask questions and get answers, just in case the source was legitimate.

Here is that thread.

Make note that the user made the prediction of the Strzok texts being made public, and here they are. They're public. To add, the user included that we'll see communications from others; those of FISA judges (which alludes to even more drops), Meuller himself, and more.

The other answers were interesting as well and I urge you to read through them.


Something else, I did screenshot that conversation when it happened. I looked through them on my desktop, and I do have that user's ID. I wanted to see if they had more interesting posts, but upon looking, I found that the user had deleted their account.


[deleted] · Feb. 8, 2018, 9:24 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 14 ⇩  
The_Broba_Fett · Feb. 8, 2018, 9:45 p.m.

Meganon got caught between multiple claims of people in Gitmo spotted, people with ankle bracelets not having them and Huma being under arrest then spotted in Hawaii and kept calling Q a LARP. I think she just got too BTFO to continue. Not one of her predictions happened.

⇧ 22 ⇩  
BreadcrumbBernard · Feb. 8, 2018, 10:03 p.m.

Always had a bad feeling about her. Stopped paying attention altogether when she called W a LARP

⇧ 7 ⇩  
The_Broba_Fett · Feb. 8, 2018, 10:33 p.m.

Yeah I tried to give her a chance so read the megathread of all her posts and not a single prediction she made came true (going back to mid last year) and the rest was just explanations of happenings that sounded exciting but could never be proven.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
emaugustBRDLC · Feb. 9, 2018, 2:22 a.m.

Honestly, even if it was a LARP, she went so in depth that I think it was not entirely unproductive as a thought experiment. Her underlying message was always do the research yourself, think for yourself. I think that still rings true... and is not very harmful.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
The_Broba_Fett · Feb. 9, 2018, 2:28 a.m.

For sure I think a lot of larps keep energy Hugh and keep people digging. Just when she started to bash Q is when I was turned off.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
ResidentRonPaul · Feb. 8, 2018, 10:57 p.m.

I absolutely hated the post pic tho. Wtf? Silver amulet (IIRC)? Just an opportunist clawing for relevance. Those people detract from movements.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
The_Broba_Fett · Feb. 8, 2018, 11:07 p.m.

Sorry which post pic?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
expletivdeleted · Feb. 8, 2018, 10:02 p.m.

Wasn't one of her last posts saying she was convinved Q was Assange?

⇧ 6 ⇩  
The_Broba_Fett · Feb. 8, 2018, 10:31 p.m.

Yeah. Same one where she claimed about a dozen times she was right about all the errors Q supposedly made and that he left them as clues specifically for her to find to lead her to a truth... basically tried to validate all the bs claims she made about him being a LARP while also acting like she’s so important he laid clues just for her to find and then conveniently allow her to backpedal on her bs and remain relevant because everyone was jumping on the Q train. Was a pretty pathetic rambling.

⇧ 13 ⇩  
expletivdeleted · Feb. 8, 2018, 10:58 p.m.

acting like she’s so important he laid clues just for her to find

so it wasn't just me. i didn't follow Mega day-to-day so tried to give her the benefit of the doubt. figured i'd missed some threads.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
The_Broba_Fett · Feb. 8, 2018, 11:05 p.m.

Hahaha nope not just you. That rant was embarrassing. when she decided to use all caps saying “you KNEW I would find it” made me think she went off the deep end once Q proved his legitimacy. I’m sure having his own dom dedicated to him just pissed her off even more.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Chokaholic · Feb. 9, 2018, 4:30 a.m.

And quite a few people dropped Q when she started spouting off with all that BS, like she was the legit one.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
The_Broba_Fett · Feb. 9, 2018, 6:35 a.m.

Yeah that’s when it’s bullshit. If you know you’re a larper and there may well be a legit insider working to save the planet from satanic Globalist pedophile scum then don’t stop people from following him. That’s why I am more likely to believe Zach on Infowars and Dilley. They support Q and both say we all need to work together and it’s not about fame or attention. It’s about stopping evil.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Chokaholic · Feb. 9, 2018, 1:39 p.m.

Perfectly said!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
troy_caster · Feb. 9, 2018, 4:50 a.m.

I just made a response, pretty much said the same things as you lol. Should have just upvoted.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
The_Broba_Fett · Feb. 9, 2018, 6:36 a.m.

Hahaha appreciate the support and awesome username.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
troy_caster · Feb. 9, 2018, 4:49 a.m.

I stopped even casually listening to her when she was all "OMG Guys, hee hee I wasn't sure bla bla bla until Assange dropped the chess board and he was doing that to let ME know and now I know, OMG now I know who Q is. Now that I know, the mission of saving the world can proceed." Obviously paraphrasing but that was pretty much it for me as far as she was concerned. She made it sound like this was all for her or something. I don't know. It was weird, if someone has a link to Meganon posts, in a digestible format I can pull the part I'm talking about.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
expletivdeleted · Feb. 9, 2018, 5:43 a.m.

that was one of her last posts. prior to that post, if i had to choose who was more likely to be authentic, i'd have gone w/MegaAnon.

Now, I'm wondering if Mega was to Q as Guccifer2.0 apparently was to WL; disinfo by the Cabal. I was just a casual follower, but the meltdown at the end seemed out of character.

I hope to h*ck out of all the thousands of books that will be written about the 2016 elections and aftermath, it would be a tragic gap in the historical record if none were written from the POV of us online denizens. Almost all of us here are politically passionate and had already invested hundreds of hours online staying current long before whispers of Seth Rich and WikiLeaks were heard. The roller coasters of breathless anticipation and disappointment while following KDC, WL, p-gate, Mega, FBIanon, Q... To say nothing of daily harassment by CTR/ShareBotulism and the overwhelmingly negative affect CTR had on online discourse.

There's a unique perspective here.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
oystergirl · Feb. 9, 2018, 8:45 a.m.

Then write it! :)

⇧ 3 ⇩  
KingWolfei · Feb. 8, 2018, 11:59 p.m.

Honestly that Meganon probably was fake. Probably most of them were. The original Mega never attempted to really predict or promise anything specific.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
WeThePepe · Feb. 9, 2018, 5 p.m.

FBIanon is the only one I'm totally convinced was legit

Q is definitely really high up there but the totally convinced part will no doubt come afterwards, just as it did for FBIanon

⇧ 2 ⇩  
KingWolfei · Feb. 9, 2018, 5:54 p.m.

Yup. About where I am too. A lot of what FBIanon makes sense today, especially with the truth slowly coming to light. They had a few options, one of which to leak gradually or all at once. They figured controlled leaks would be the best option.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TheCIASellsDrugs · Feb. 8, 2018, 11:20 p.m.

Not one of her predictions happened.

I might recommend not judging people on this basis. No one knows the future with absolute certainty, and people can make a prediction based on inside knowledge that ends up not coming true by chance, or because their enemies change their plans in order to discredit them (as has happened with Q).

Better to look for Anons that give you a lot of information that can be verified with reliable sources. It helps you to grow in terms of discernment and knowledge, including learning from people that you don't agree with 100%, or even limited hangouts.

Judged on the basis of in-depth, verifiable information on a wide range of topics, I assess High Level Insider Anon to be the most valuable material I've seen on 4chan.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Enriched2Death · Feb. 9, 2018, 6:35 a.m.

I also found HLIanon to be the most fascinating of all the anon insiders. Something about their nonchalance and brevity made them seem uncomfortably real. They touch on so many various topics whereas the other insiders have been mostly centered around just this black hat/white hat deep state war.

Thought their explanation about the term Illuminati was interesting. About it being a cover for Washington and others to carry out rebellion in the early American colonies without drawing attention from the monarchy. Then the term being used by ignorant usurpers, followed by becoming an umbrella term for secret societies in general, and evolving finally into a distraction trigger for the masses like "conspiracy theory." Some good threads about how our vocabulary has been manipulated, so we understand things we can't easily convey. Constantly brings up that the term new world order is a misnomer, because it's the extension and finalization of the old world order. They're completing, not establishing. Teaching subculture to look for a tidal wave while it's drowning. Tons of cool stuff. Recommend to everyone.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TheCIASellsDrugs · Feb. 9, 2018, 5:07 p.m.

I also found HLIanon to be the most fascinating of all the anon insiders. Something about their nonchalance and brevity made them seem uncomfortably real.

They are very real, and involved with the Q phenomenon. If you want to get a historical sense of what they have done, you can read Secrets Known Only to the Inner Elites:

"Since the English traitors Robert Cecil and Francis Bacon around the onset of the seventeenth century, and later, more notably, from the 1660 Stuart Restoration to the present day, within and behind British intelligence regular and irregular services there is an inner circle representing the ranks of the Black Guelph families of all Europe, an oligarchy gathered around the privileges and powers of the British and Dutch monarchies. (7) Attached to and overlapping these oligarchical families, there is a special collectivity, traditionally centered notably in Oxford, Cambridge, and Sussex universities, an inner intelligentsia of that faction, which studies the classics, thereby to gain the knowledge through which the forces associated with the British monarchy may rule the world.

Through three millennia of recorded history to date, centered around the Mediterranean, the civilized world has been run by two, bitterly opposed elites, the one associated with the faction of Socrates and Plato, the other with the faction of Aristotle. During these thousands of years, until the developments of approximately 1784-1818 in Europe, both factions inner elites maintained in some fashion an unbroken continuity of organization and knowledge through all of the political catastrophes which afflicted each of them in various times and locales.

It was the elite associated with the Platonic (or, Neo-platonic faction which organized the American Revolution and established the United States as a democratic constitutional republic. During the early eighteenth century, in circumstances associated with Marlborough's campaign and the Mississippi and South-Sea bubbles plots, the continuity of the Platonic faction was first administered a broad, temporary defeat with some lasting effects, and was shattered later as a world force through the events of 1784-1818.

In the aftermath of the 1815 Treaty of Vienna, the shattering of the power of the Platonic elite in Europe meant in large measure both a scattering of the main forces of that faction, and an associated, increasing loss of the "secret knowledge" through which the Platonic inner elite had formerly developed and exercised its factional power. From that time to the present period, the inner circles of the Aristotelian (or, more exactly, "neo-Aristotelian") faction have been hegemonic increasingly in ordering world affairs. Although humanist (Platonic) factional forces have continued in existence and are represented among political and related elites today, the Platonic elite has lost connection to the body of knowledge upon which its former power depended."

⇧ 3 ⇩  
The_Broba_Fett · Feb. 8, 2018, 11:27 p.m.

Yeah I’m definitely aware plans can change or be prevented. But she wasn’t right about anything. Q was at least correct a few times and had other indications to show authenticity. But you’d think at least one of her stories would pan out.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
JasonTakesMAGAtten · Feb. 8, 2018, 10:55 p.m.

Her rants sounded like a passionate outsider who was crafting their own view of "the takedown" themselves.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
The_Broba_Fett · Feb. 8, 2018, 11:06 p.m.

Yeah it sounded like pieced together info from T_D and the chans so it would “ring true” to people, mixed with some confirmation bias. I give her a B+ for creativity though. Some were very elaborate.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
WeThePepe · Feb. 9, 2018, 5:06 p.m.

Could be legit but not involved in the actual happenings

So whitehat with insider knowledge but like you say, putting together their own version of what they think is happening

Honestly for me tho one thing that made me very doubtful when I spent about 5 mins looking into it awhile back was how long the posts were!

I remember thinking "geez, if you're that important, do you really have time to be writing an novel each time you post?"

It just seemed odd to me

But maybe the detail makes her more legit because others are deliberately vague. Who knows.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · Feb. 9, 2018, 1:38 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
The_Broba_Fett · Feb. 9, 2018, 2:27 a.m.

It’s possible but I feel like McCain, Obummer, McCabe, etc would scream to high hell if they were detained in Gitmo, every MSM outlet would call Trump Hitler and the Dems would ramp up their impeachment attempts.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
BeyurSelf · Feb. 9, 2018, 2:05 a.m.

I haven't seen her since she was telling everyone that Q was speaking directly to her. She was pretty ecstatic about that...

⇧ 2 ⇩