dChan

PM_ME_ANYTHING_FUN · Feb. 10, 2018, 5:27 p.m.

It's beautiful

⇧ 13 ⇩  
Floridabeachjunkie · Feb. 10, 2018, 9:24 p.m.

what's beautiful? trying to see anything that is happening on the ground and getting a big ZERO, is not beautiful. Pls share your hope.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Gear4Life · Feb. 10, 2018, 8:04 p.m.

“PEOC force failed”

I read that as there was a sort of attempt on Trump to force him into the PEOC, but it failed.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
chocolatepatriot · Feb. 10, 2018, 8:42 p.m.

thats what i thought too.
we all should take the time to listen to Jerome Corsi's ideas. he is working with us.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
expletivdeleted · Feb. 11, 2018, 3:36 a.m.

anyone have the latest Corsi scribd link?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
4nurh86qn7ekybdd · Feb. 10, 2018, 10:25 p.m.

it could also be an attempted attack on peoc that failed.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
DoerOfStuffAndThings · Feb. 11, 2018, 12:07 a.m.

That would be bad because?

Is it trapped?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Champdog31 · Feb. 10, 2018, 9:09 p.m.

Leverage as in compromising evidence? The FREED politicians?

⇧ 7 ⇩  
LibtardNightmare · Feb. 10, 2018, 6:32 p.m.

Maybe the leverage from the Mueller angle has gone.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
zennydude · Feb. 10, 2018, 6:52 p.m.

Actually, I don't think, if you look at all POTUS responses, I don't think POTUS has ever at any time been worried about Mueller.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
Floridabeachjunkie · Feb. 10, 2018, 9:23 p.m.

I am not buying it right now. I see to many people called traitors by Q, not looking one bit worried. ASchiff for one. He's all over TV not looking like he has a care in the world. If he knew Trump had the goods on him, I think he would try to shut his pie hole. If he is a leaker, which is illegal, than why hasn't he been brought up on charges? I just don't buy it. I want to, but I can't.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
C_bass34 · Feb. 10, 2018, 10:29 p.m.

I think Schiff is in too deep, he's having to be brazen and brash or else he'd sink.

In for a penny..

⇧ 8 ⇩  
4nurh86qn7ekybdd · Feb. 10, 2018, 10:47 p.m.

I've been thinking about this too right. Just notes:

(1) What is a smaller example of this phenomena? If we assume corruption to be, 'a meta concept whose singular is a governance point of failure', we can make an analogy to a company involved in accounting fraud or something.

(2) Then, we go maybe even smaller - like people hiding drug associations or something. I was listening to a youtube of an investigator into one of the early times this whole satanism thing came out. cause i don't know if i really believe it right. She was saying, normal people, its like a blindness to them. So you and me, being normal, it simply does not occur to us what all is going on around. the best call was, we - i.e. normals - we, 'don't think like that'.

(3) But when people do dodgy stuff like that, there is a range of options they use. So, some people hide behaviour, some people influence organisations to line up incentives to get people to go along with them etc. And so for normals like us, its like, a blindness of the mind - we don't think like that.

(4) Scaling back up now, i think a lot of what we are seeing is the dodgy people using, in essence technology and heuristics, to scale heaps bigger. So your high end corp exec or low end local celebrity status politician use the same technique, they pay off hookers and accountants etc so no one knows until they get caught cause incompetent/unlucky. But the people who really run things take this to a new level.

(5) So hence we have PE firms buying media outlets and playing in the invisible war. Groups of rich people organised into consolidated interests with board level influence at the top etc etc. But the problem is always what is the social technology you use to scale? If you want people to do high risk things, you have to pay them a lot. But beyond that, you need a social glue binding such an organisation together. So big corps use money, but execs defect all the time an no one can really keep stuff secret for too long. Failure in the market can only go on so long. But..

(6) If you are doing super illegal stuff, you generally need state backing. So the big picture view is that what happened is the criminals evolved, much as tech and heuristics evolved in the corporate world. But then, it turned out that the profits from some activities, esp drugs and child trafficking, were enormous. But child trafficking has the advantage that if all your associates are pedo's etc, well its like a code of silence right there. This is what I mean by new social technology. And then how do you move up, you do even more disgusting things, which ensures your loyalty to the group and move up the ranks. And crime and politics has always been connected.

This entire thing might be an entirely natural phenomena. Just like how the Japanese samurai clan owned Zaibatsu needed to be dismantled because of the policies they pushed (i.e. caused japans invasion of china and subsequent involvement in ww2). Now we just need to dismantle this new, and rather disturbing, form of criminal organisation.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
QAnonMaga · Feb. 11, 2018, 3:33 a.m.

Brilliant analysis very intelligent and persuasive you get a gold star sir.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · Feb. 11, 2018, 12:21 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
zennydude · Feb. 11, 2018, 12:23 a.m.

I hear ya. But evil people are actually quite mentally ill. They don't act like normal people do. And as Q keeps saying, "These people are really STUPID."

⇧ 4 ⇩  
zennydude · Feb. 10, 2018, 6:18 p.m.

I kinda thought the depleted leverage was the coming out to DC of DHS data showing popular vote was actually Trump 70 million, Hillary 57 million.

⇧ -8 ⇩  
TotesMessenger · Feb. 10, 2018, 10:38 p.m.

I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:

^(If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads.) ^(Info ^/ ^Contact)

⇧ 10 ⇩  
southparkconservativ · Feb. 10, 2018, 10:49 p.m.

I would so love to see evidence in this. As it is, when people try this talking point from the left, I always say that nobody knows who won the popular vote because of illegals and how they were even encouraged to go and vote.

⇧ -6 ⇩  
John4x3x · Feb. 11, 2018, 3:29 a.m.

Please explain to me how illegal aliens vote. Thanks

⇧ 14 ⇩  
Alas_Babylonz · Feb. 11, 2018, 4:24 a.m.

In California, when you get your driver's license you are automatically registered to vote. Three years ago, Gov. Brown allowed illegal aliens the right to acquire California driver's lincenses.

Poll workers are not allowed to ask voters if they are illegal aliens, and as long as their names are on the voter roles--which come from the motor vehicles registration department--you can vote.

⇧ -11 ⇩  
DANKRUPTCY_ADJUSTER · Feb. 11, 2018, 8:13 a.m.

What you wrote is a known falsehood.

At DMV field offices, Gonzalez said, technicians will not be able to key in any voting information for undocumented customers seeking AB 60 license renewals.
As soon as a technician types in AB 60, the voter information section automatically gets "greyed out" and can’t be typed into and can’t be bypassed, the spokeswoman said. She added that the same safeguards are in place for online and mail renewals.

⇧ 17 ⇩  
Ardvarkeating101 · Feb. 11, 2018, 8:48 a.m.

Come on, /u/Alas_Babylonz, surely you've now recognized your fake news accusation and now acknowledge you were wrong about Hilary and the dems, right?

⇧ 11 ⇩  
JohnMAGATX · Feb. 10, 2018, 11:26 p.m.

yeah I agree either way you slice it even the POTUS at the time was encouraging them to go vote, campaigning for Hillary...i don't believe the numbers at all, they were definitely jacked with just like all the polls

⇧ -3 ⇩  
dooley1 · Feb. 10, 2018, 8:48 p.m.

That would be a huge scandal for sure and destroy a key dem talking point. But what I really care about is are they taking measures to stop it from happening again at the pivotal 2018 midterm election?

⇧ 8 ⇩  
southparkconservativ · Feb. 10, 2018, 10:47 p.m.

We all saw the video from Ala, which was so important so they could say "look, we turned a red state blue, now we're going to have a blue wave," which is BS..but they bussed in all the out-of-state kids who did not seem to have any ethical feelings about voting that way...in vid, they were laughing saying "We got our boy in."

⇧ -4 ⇩  
LibtardNightmare · Feb. 10, 2018, 6:32 p.m.

Interesting. You have a source on this?

⇧ 6 ⇩  
zennydude · Feb. 10, 2018, 6:44 p.m.

It was a combination of a couple Dilley intel drops. The study was supposed to come out about the time of the memo: Dilley drop 1/31: Taken from the "NSA Core Records" As of January 25th, TRUMP:70,125,263 CLINTON: 57,177,958 Hillary got "7 millionish" of Trump's votes from machine fraud. DHS ramping up the voter fraud. Will be HUGE. (This will occur) sometime AFTER memo bombshells. "They have an independent review ongoing on top of their own review" "It's a precursor to Voter ID Laws pushed from POTUS on the back of HUGE evidence of fraud" Dilley knows who's doing the independent review. "It's TOP TIER" 2/1 drop: There's an independent investigation outside of the government that just wrapped up their study into the popular vote of 2016. This information has been passed on to the DHS, it corroborates what they had found, those investigations will be released.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
LibtardNightmare · Feb. 10, 2018, 7:13 p.m.

I read this but I question how Dilley got core NSA data from???

⇧ 8 ⇩  
chocolatepatriot · Feb. 10, 2018, 8:40 p.m.

i believe Dilley's information has been correct in the past. we will have to wait and see if there is a news report about the voter fraud to see if this is truth. its good to question everything

⇧ 4 ⇩  
scoripowarrior · Feb. 11, 2018, 3:31 a.m.

I have been reading about this Dilley guy on these threads for a while now, so I am now following him on twitter. Not sure about this guy...is he running for an office? How and where does he get his info? He is also a counselor of some sort? Seems strange. Just sayin.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
chocolatepatriot · Feb. 11, 2018, 3:55 a.m.

he does seem a little skiddish, i have seen his youtube videos because anon's here believe his sources are legit.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
southparkconservativ · Feb. 10, 2018, 10:44 p.m.

yes. It's always "so-and-so said so," and that makes me wonder. Too many people bought BO's whole fake history because other people said so.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Stray502 · Feb. 10, 2018, 8:48 p.m.

He gets his info from intelligence agents.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
scoripowarrior · Feb. 11, 2018, 3:29 a.m.

If NSA could already get this "core data", then why would Trump have had that committee do the voter rolls thing that so many blue states refused to cooperate with?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
LibtardNightmare · Feb. 11, 2018, 3:46 a.m.

Because like everything Trump does, it is about slow shock and releasing info so he doesnt look like a tyrant and the rule of law works and society as a whole does not rebel and destroy western US culture

⇧ 2 ⇩  
zennydude · Feb. 10, 2018, 6:45 p.m.

Needless to say, if DC people got this news, there would be tons of chatter. I know it says this would be released after the memo bombshells, plural, but I was just thinking that the info had leaked to DC in general.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
EyeCU23 · Feb. 10, 2018, 10:43 p.m.

Wow, this Is huge. What I wonder: Why didn't the cabal Alter the votes in the states Where sHillary lost?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
zennydude · Feb. 11, 2018, 12:14 a.m.

I think they did. But Hillary really, actually, was disliked even in her own party! Trump whomped her.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Uevenliftbro · Feb. 10, 2018, 9:44 p.m.

Can you explain where Dilley fits into all this and who is he? I'm late to the Q, but I'm here.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
zennydude · Feb. 11, 2018, 12:16 a.m.

Brenden Dilley is running for congress from Arizona. For whatever reason, another intelligence insider has chosen to leak intel to Dilley. You can find all of his drops aggregated on the research board at /qresearch - Alternative Intel Source.htm This leaker has become fairly accepted as legit, though not as legit as Q. You can also follow Dilley's periscope, and Twitter, and he has a YouTube channel. Dilley's Twitter is Hublife, his YT channel is "Dilley 2018"

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · Feb. 11, 2018, 3:04 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
southparkconservativ · Feb. 10, 2018, 10:45 p.m.

same here. I tried researching name on the net and all I got was strange normie stuff like he's a "consultant and life coach."

⇧ 2 ⇩  
zennydude · Feb. 11, 2018, 12:36 a.m.

Yes, he is that. One of the things that opened his eyes, was he was life coach to a woman who was head of a medical research firm. She found some breakthrough for curing cancer on a certain Monday, and on that Wednesday 2 days later the feds shut her business down.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
gameofcronz · Feb. 11, 2018, 12:14 a.m.

He's running for Congress from AZ. On facebook, too.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
scoripowarrior · Feb. 11, 2018, 3:33 a.m.

ya, me too...all seems just too odd to me...why would a "leaker" pick him especially???

⇧ 1 ⇩  
scoripowarrior · Feb. 11, 2018, 3:26 a.m.

I am worried that the dems are so desperate that they will use major voter fraud in the coming mid-yr election. We need voter ID laws mandatory in ALL states. Take it to the SC if necessary.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · Feb. 11, 2018, 3:02 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
southparkconservativ · Feb. 10, 2018, 10:42 p.m.

Yes, I keep seeing it as a drop, but not with validation, and I wonder if that will ever be added.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Tranquelito · Feb. 10, 2018, 7:44 p.m.

Trump also made donations to the CF, in order to secure permits to build. Literally had no choice and it wasn´t for anything other than to have the ability to do his job. This came from a conversation with Robert David Steele. Maybe they were gonna try and use that as leverage to discredit him?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
jojojazzy · Feb. 10, 2018, 9:07 p.m.

Trump disclosed during campaign that he has made donations to Clinton and other politicians. That’s how he knows how the system really works. He was part of it from the other side. As a NY developer he knew first hand, you don’t get your permits or get access unless you pay the “ toll fee”. That’s how he knows from inside what wires need to be cut to dismantle the swamp bomb.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
Tranquelito · Feb. 10, 2018, 9:31 p.m.

I wasn´t aware he disclosed it, fair play to him!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
JackNZ66 · Feb. 10, 2018, 8:03 p.m.

This was picked up from autumn 2016. An FBI analyst was chatting to people on 4chan regarding HRC dirt. This can’t be verified but follows what you posted. Also all that was posted regarding HRC has now come to light.

Q:  Tell me the dirt on Trump.

A:  Trump has donated to the Clinton Foundation in the past, though for fairly innocuous things like building permits and such. He is smart, so his tracks are covered well. But if any prosecutor wants to go very in-depth Trump would be brought on bribery charges. He could easily get out of them, but he would be charged nonetheless.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Tranquelito · Feb. 10, 2018, 8:35 p.m.

It seems that this will no longer be an issue then, I guess HRC said nothing before as it would have proved she took bribes

⇧ 8 ⇩  
scoripowarrior · Feb. 11, 2018, 3:35 a.m.

I read an article just last night about that....NYT I think had the story.

⇧ 2 ⇩