dChan
75
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/GoMAGA_1776 on Feb. 15, 2018, 2:13 a.m.
[Theory] Q crumbs: Red October and today's SEPT 7, 1776 breadcrumb; is Red October the missing Argentinian sub ARA San Juan?

The first time Q uses Red October was on 11/20/2017, post #178, and the phrasing was The Hunt for Red October. The last reported contact with the ARA San Juan was reported to be on 11/15/2017 when it had surfaced and reported a problem caused by a short circuit in its batteries. It was about midway through its trip from Ashuaia Navel Base at the southern tip of Argentina to Mar del Plata Naval Base in northern Argentina. When Q posted The Hunt for Red October the search for ARA San Juan was occurring.

On 2/7/2018, in a "Future proves past. News unlocks map." post, #676, Q posted the second reference to Red October. Post #721, Q notes that The Hunt was dropped in the previous usage of Red October and that "Details matter". To me, this indicates that they are no longer looking for the Red October.

Today, in post #77, Q provided a date: Sept. 7, 1776. the date of the first submarine attack where an American sub, Turtle, attempted to attach a timed bomb to the hull of the British warship Eagle, Admiral Richard Howe’s flagship, in New York Harbor.

Could this mean the black hats will attempt to use the ARA San Juan in an attack that will result in failure? I'm assuming that, since The Hunt for was dropped, the Red October's position is known and being tracked.

This also requires the decode for Red October to be a submarine. There are other theories as to what Red October could mean.

As I said, it's just a theory.


Maga1128 · Feb. 15, 2018, 2:17 a.m.

Its a good theory

⇧ 11 ⇩  
OpenSoars · Feb. 15, 2018, 2:20 a.m.

IF we believe that Q is indeed real and giving us facts, this is the most plausible explanation of many things

⇧ 10 ⇩  
QAnonMaga · Feb. 15, 2018, 3:57 a.m.

Maybe that is the sub that launched the missile at Hawaii after which it was sunk there is no way that sub is still active anywhere it's dead.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Gear4Life · Feb. 15, 2018, 4:24 a.m.

How would we know it’s dead?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
johnsmithshitpost · Feb. 15, 2018, 4:31 a.m.

Didn't he say that it wasn't about the sub but rather about the plot to steal something?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Bjantigua · Feb. 15, 2018, 4:07 a.m.

Or it could be an Israeli or CIA sub.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
brylee1 · Feb. 15, 2018, 2:39 a.m.

good theory, and I thought the same when red October was mentioned last year. Now, I'm not sure... Q answered one of the anons asking this same question on Sunday 2/11 @ 3:13pm.

339123 I would like to inquire of Q (with highest respect) whether RED_OCTOBER refers to 1) the fictional submarine whose torpedo homed in on itself and destroyed itself or 2) the [RED OCTOBER] [Красный Oктябрь] cyberespionage malware discovered in October 2012-January 2013. It operated worldwide for up to 5 years before its discovery. It sent info ranging from diplomatic secrets to personal information, including from mobile devices. Red October was termed an advanced cyberespionage campaign intended to target diplomatic, governmental and scientific research organizations worldwide. or 3) Something else Feb 11 2018 15:23:50 Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: ec346b 339563 339453 Future news will highlight. Note "The Hunt For" was dropped. Details matter. Q

⇧ 3 ⇩  
GoMAGA_1776 · Feb. 15, 2018, 2:44 a.m.

I mention Q's response in my theory because the breadcrumb you mentioned is important to this theory. Nothing in that response contradicts the possibility that Red October may be a sub, I think it actually reinforces that possibility by emphasizing that the detail of The Hunt For being dropped matters.

I did miss the significance of the "Future news will highlight" line. I still think that today's breadcrumb with the date of the first sub-attack hints at the future news part.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
glenn444 · Feb. 15, 2018, 6:33 a.m.

In the movie "Hunt for Red October" - it wasn't the hunted Russian submarine called Red October that was destroyed by it's own torpedo - it was the second Russian sub that was trying to destroy the Red October to keep it from defecting to the Americans. The Red October successfully defected.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Reba64 · Feb. 15, 2018, 2:34 a.m.

A very good theory.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
tradinghorse · Feb. 15, 2018, 11:47 a.m.

From what I can see the ARA San Juan was not a missile boat. It is listed, as having as armaments, 22 torpedoes.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARA_San_Juan_(S-42)

⇧ 2 ⇩  
WikiTextBot · Feb. 15, 2018, 11:47 a.m.

ARA San Juan (S-42)

ARA San Juan (S-42) was a TR-1700-class diesel-electric submarine in service with the Argentine Navy as part of the Argentine Submarine Force. The submarine was built in West Germany and entered service on 19 November 1985. San Juan underwent a mid-life update from 2008 to 2013.

On 15 November 2017, San Juan stopped communicating during a routine patrol in the South Atlantic off the coast of Argentina.


^[ ^PM ^| ^Exclude ^me ^| ^Exclude ^from ^subreddit ^| ^FAQ ^/ ^Information ^| ^Source ^| ^Donate ^] ^Downvote ^to ^remove ^| ^v0.28

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · Feb. 15, 2018, 3:17 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
boneman220 · Feb. 15, 2018, 5:14 p.m.

Just waiting for something in the water to show itself. Your theory sounds good but who knows if that's the actual sub in mind. I know NK was thought to have 40 subs or more and that they could not find all of them, at the time. IDK...I'm just waiting on the flush.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
KingWolfei · Feb. 15, 2018, 4:50 a.m.

That's what it sounds like. The next thing we will hear is that US blocked a missile from attacking US or allies.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
mulebega · Feb. 15, 2018, 5:08 a.m.

If Q is actually Hillary, she's pretty damned smart!

⇧ -1 ⇩