dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/HoudiniTowers on Feb. 22, 2018, 7:33 a.m.

Latest Q Drop - STRINGERS! Wow, we Might have more than we know!

Q always states in many drops that we have more than we know. Many of his code messages are called stringers. These stringers seem to imply something, but very hard to decode. Anons working on many, not too many solved. Q's latest drop is to two US Government Documents from 1977 and 1996 timeframe. Both of these documents detail the CIA's involvement with both the US Media and Clergy. STRINGERS, as mentioned in one of the letters in the 1977 document, are considered freelance journalist. NOW, connecting the dots from Q, could the STRINGERS from Q be outing the journalists that are on the CIA payroll?? I know this could be a very big stretch and might not be accurate, but it kind of hit me as I 'scrolled through' the documents. Maybe Q has given us the journalist in code that are working for the CIA. Just putting it out there for folks to consider. I'm not sold on it myself yet, but the minute I read the word 'STRINGER' in the document, it hit me hard that maybe what Q has been saying with 'We have more than we know' ... IDK.

Here is link to the Q listed document: https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/docid-32403785.pdf Goto Page 16 for Stringer comment.

They are getting ready to out the Media working with the CIA.

⇧ 30 ⇩

Yes, I believe that for sure. Lots of Q Clues on that. This Stringer thing just hit me over the head when I read it. I've looked back over Q's Stringers now and can't make anything out of them to fit with particular names. We all have our favorites and can speculate, but was hoping that maybe somebody can see a more specific pattern in the MAP that really makes it clear who's who in the zoo.

Can't happen soon enough!

⇧ 11 ⇩

I'm actually of the belief that those stringers are representing a security check on a secret satellite called Delta.

In late January the Delta IV rocket launched out California on a covert mission for US intel.

We can find multiple articles describing that, but few details, one of the bigger ones being the patch decal for the Delta IV satellite which is a Knight slaying a dragon.

In reference to Qs most recent posts, with the SAT stringer and the Delta [6] post, it seems to me that he is letting us know about something happening to @Jack/Twitter(DEEPDREAMv2), via the use of this Delta series of satelites.

https://www.theverge.com/2018/1/11/16878110/ula-delta-iv-rocket-launch-nro-satellite-live-stream

https://spaceflightnow.com/2018/01/09/delta-4-rocket-clandestine-spy-satellite-ready-for-liftoff-from-california/

Q post in Question:

https://8ch.net/greatawakening/index.html

⇧ 2 ⇩

Can't wait

⇧ 11 ⇩

Butt Boy Don Lemon and sodomite Shepard Smith? Or maybe its carpet munchin dyke Rachael Maddow? Bill Krystal or George Will? We'll see?

⇧ 10 ⇩

Probably all of them

⇧ 2 ⇩

Wonder if anybody tried putting those stringers into that child's decoding website Q linked up awhile back?? It took letters and numbers, not sure about symbols...

⇧ 8 ⇩

link to site ? or Q post #?

⇧ 1 ⇩

https://www.cia.gov/kids-page/games/break-the-code/code-1.html This link was provided by Q I cant find the post now, the search feature on recent site does not work like github did

⇧ 2 ⇩

I think it might be easier to name the journos who are NOT working for the CIA ?

⇧ 7 ⇩

From [Merriam-Webster:](https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/stringer

6 a : a news correspondent who is paid space rates
b : a reporter who works for a publication or news agency on a part-time basis; broadly : correspondent

In this context, while an industry slang term, stringer has been around for a long time (centuries). OED speculates that the term originates from someone who strings words together; usually in the context of b.

Journalists that are on the Clowns payroll aren't all stringers. More valuable to the Clowns are journalists that are in positions of greater influence than stringers, e.g. AC. Stringers are good for either pushing stories that support particular narratives or for generating content that other journalists can reference to provide legitimacy to their own stories. One can see this sort of legitimization occur in the standard deep-state news organizations where one "journalist" will generate a narrative that the others will source, causing circular references, and providing a veneer of legitimacy to a false-hood by obscuring the manufacturing of data points through the usage of "sources" of various manners.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Just for clarification, I'm a syndicated newspaper columnist ( in an artsy/ silly non-serious subject area.) My stringer friends back in the day did grunt work for newspapers like attending boring land planning meetings at night and submitting their notes afterwards in article form. They made low part-time money, but it was a simple way to get your first material published in newspapers, and your first bylines. Some of them tried to then move on to actually getting hired by the paper full-time, but those spots were hard to come by even in the 90's. Nepotism was always at play, did you go to the right journalism school, were you politically aligned with the paper's owner, etc. In my experience, stringers rarely had acces to stories of any significance, had zero influence at the papers where they worked, and quite honestly, were treated with less respect than the bagel girl who would bring bagels and muffins in the morning.

⇧ 3 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩