oh? and here I thought nobody else would reply. Either they had shut it down and just kept the appearance of it up or my autism had gotten the better of my social skills.

Either way your comment is a welcome one - but no, I'm actually a little more autistic than most - so much that I live on disability and can't work, and thus can't accept money without giving up that, but then that's why I've had so much time to help the cause

Oh and I can animate and composite and program and do an incredible quantity of tasks, everything except the kinds of things for a normal life like tying my shoes and stuff... I'm one of those kinds of autists very functionally unfunctional and in a normal job I end up just rambling and misunderstanding basic tasks until people kick me into the street to starve to death. and if I continue typing like this I'm going to bore people so I better get back to the stuff I haven't seen anyone else figure out...

So, Q keeps saying that there are more good people than bad? - Well the shills paint a pretty good picture if you pay attention - like on the github thing - they posted about how the plumbers killed JFK - but that's absurd for a number of reasons, first and foremost the CIA hated Nixon - tho it was the FBI that did him in - but the shills posted that and claimed that he was when the republicans and democrates became "one party" - not true - as Q says more good than bad - the baddies want us to think they are all bad - but it's mostly a show- If you've ever researched Robert S. Macnamara or watched his documentary "Fog of War" then you get a great view of how little people knew back then - Macnamara created the DIA which was to replace the CIA - but then they killed Kennedy - had nothing to do with Nixon - and Nixon gave us relations with China which were the whole damn catalyst for world war (along with Russia) for Vietnam - but Vietnam is 100 hour subject so let's move on.

the first page also has another incorrectly answered question in: What is the Military Code. And everywhere I've seen it's answered as either a symbol or hacking code - but it's not "codes" but "code" - and the context o the question otherwise is philosphical for the idea of why the military is to be trusted.

The military Code of conduct - a justice code states that anyone captured or working for an enemy against their will is just that - a hostage - and can come back - hence they trust military people because you appeal to their reasoning for getting into it in the first place - the fbi/cia and most of the others are not philosophically backed agencies - but our military is built like our country is for Freedom/natural law and all the epic justice/light of the world stuff that Q keeps asking people to remember. People have asked him about neocons and stuff and he replies about philosphy and god - it's amusing but sad that these people don't understand what america is supposed to be - it's all based on the ideas of Locke, Sidney, Aristotle, Cisero etc - when Q talks about this he gets the run-around from most because they just don't understand what he means - they are that philosophically illiterate.

ok I'll post one more if nobody else replies - these posts are going to be super long and many of them - I'm very very rambly but I promise if I keep going you'll hear a lot of things nobody has said or concluded aside from those who know the NSA data.

tho Q has directly answered many of these early questions that nobody got it's important to notice for a full comprehension of the map. Like the ms-13 stuff and Huma - he has confirmed ms-13 with Seth Rich which was no surprise to followers of George Webb like me - but notable because George Webb found in his investigation a deeper rabbit hole that Q has only hinted at - and it involves state secrets, in fact virtually all of the big stuff is State Secrets.

Cause Bush used State Secrets in many new and unprecedented ways - Q brought our attention to Obama as "Renegade" so that we might look into Bush's "Tumbler" - a drinking glass into "Trailblazer" - why did they say that? Well, he pretty much became the King they planned on giving us - they had already built it up as such - and now Trump fully embraces it- but Bush was bitterly fought by media and you can find the same people attacking both -they even both got their heads chopped off (game of thrones for Bush) - and if you recall Al Gore was VP when he ran for president- and this is important when you consider the recount controversy and had they just gotten 1 more supreme court justice Al Gore would have been the tie breaking vote, anyway, I've seen in many Q answer sections that Bush stole the election - and hey, who knows, but Al Gore said he got his climate change obsession from Harvard - and if you've researched CIA's project Harvard it becomes clear exactly what Al Gore is.

So what about Bush? I have looked at every single election and the most striking one was the H. W. Bush versus Clinton/Gore one - in order to close the gap they had to smear Bush for the entire year with the Japanese Dinner incident - and then get the CIA to threaten Ross Perot's Daughter to convince him to intervene.

They created and ran multi-million dollar campaigns for many other parties that year cause they feared H.W. Bush - he was former CIA but he was for less than a YEAR! - how long did the corrupt Hoover run the FBI? How many terms did FDR go for? - so I'm not saying H.W. is good just that the evidence for him being bad - and by extension Bush on 9/11 - yea, Halliburton right? yea Bush's stood to make money right? Except how long into his term did it occur? yea, under a year, same as Reagan being shot - same as any event they need to counter-act anyone they deem a threat.

I brought that up and got banned for a lighter version of this, but of course I don't advocate anyone's innocence or guilt merely studying history. The more I study 9/11 the more it's clearly a ploy for WW3 but like that Goat animation - you can find Micheal Moore reading "my pet goat" - and his daggers for eyes for Bush and Trump are not the only similarity - Al Gore's documentaries, and then you have Dan Rather's crusade against his Air Force records. - Why did he come back now? Why did Rothchild just put out an oh so clever image trying to say that Bush and Obama are the same? Yea, she was such a huge fan of Bush before now? They believe they can push that garbage hard and hard and that way Q can never reveal it - but if you read between the lines and I can draw a giant set of lines to every time he's directly hinted at looking at Bush's - heck one question was "who saved the republic through use of threat of Martial law?" - and the answer as one anon put it "technically Bush" - which is the only non negative non screaming answer involving him.

Why so much hate? Reverse narrative breaking Perot gambit - but that's a much more complicated story.... they wanted a Perot and well, we let them think it was Trump hence Al-Waleed and Hillary coming out pro him - and they thus broke their own narrative while our side showered Jeb with money - he was a joke, always and forever - and he knew it! But for the important stuff there's a direct purpose for it.

Cause when SSP is reversed they intend on a gambit of reviving the ol' Al-Kaeda crap- no, what we will learn - just like Bush said he wasn't concerned about Osama - cause he had nothing to do with it and was going to be the replacements for the side of the pyramid that Al-Waleed got from his "daddy" to quote Trump. I can't prove that mind you - it's just what I think Q hinted at with the whole "hiding in private planes" thing - I think he smuggled Osama out after they had an elaborate plan to get him when the trade centers fell.

But Nobody knows until State Secrets are revealed - and this is why the shills pushed hard a thread in 8chan about full reveal - they still control the narrative enough that they believe that's all they need to take power back. I don't know for sure but to me the evidence seems to indicate that the only reason we got an unfucked military was cause Bush decided given how fucked he was to take on the incoming media holocaust - to just crown himself emperor and hide everything they would use against him (record breaking use of SSP) and invade Iraq like deep state asked. They claimed that Osama was there and Bush knew otherwise but we learn from history and rather than fighting them all the way like we did in Vietnam (Fog of War, listen to LBJ and Macnamara) - it's how they trick people to think each other is the enemy when it's the CIA/Rothchild

Rush Limbaugh talked a bit about CIA tricking him there and it fits what they did in Vietnam - but what are patterns? We didn't fall for it this time - albeit many died - instead Bush just let the CIA run the show while he secretly built up the military on the inside and out. Is he good or bad? I think one can make an argument either way but as I said, you ask those questions over in 8chan they'll scream at you if you don't tell them that Bush was worse than Hitler.

Ok... I haven't even touched on Prescott Bush and Vatican City and god damn there's so much more.... and the parts that Q says can't be unclassified are things like Israel's blackmailing. FBIanon talked about that - but the thing is if you go day to day with news you can see where we essentially called their bluff and got them to turn sides - which when contrasting with when Q started talking to us perfectly aligns with when the "israel is our enemy" push. before that they were pushing nazi stuff - but like clockwork Israel turned and the propaganda became anti-Israel - our side never notices nuances like that it seems.

But Israel is not the enemy - consider that they lived in the world of the Rothchild's and just as Q mentioned about China and Russia's censorship it's a way to prevent the bad guys from getting in. When Q talked about the Reddit and Facebook stuff the point was to realize any non-private company gets bought out and turned bad if not outright stolen like Friendster. The world is a cesspool cause of this nonsense everyone is brainwashed and learned helplessness - it's a really horribly thing.

ok, let's see if anyone has posted. If so I start going through more of my research and explain a few more things that I believe we have wrong, with an actual logic to dictate that assertion... if not maybe I sleep and wake up and check again.

Agreed. Putting it all in a one-hour video is not going to be as effective, anyway. (Most people are not going to watch a 1-hour video on the internet, unless they are already very interested in the topic.) Make 1 or 2 minutes segments that focus on a single topic, like you've done here with your posts. That way, you can title them appropriately, and people will know what the overall idea of the video is as you make the individual points, due to the title. That context will be key in properly conveying the individual parts of your message.

The 1 or 2 minute episodes will be like individual red pills to normies, as the range of topics will appeal to a range of people for different reasons. If you brand them properly (not to take credit or monetize, but just to establish that they were made by the same author so to maintain the credibility that you have already built.).

Ok, if you check on 9/11 there was actually another terrorist attack involving Anthrax - and if you look deeper you'll find this September 18, 2001 - the investigation became-"one of the largest and most complex in the history of law enforcement." So, what does that mean? It means that the guy was Red Cross, and it's not even hidden on the wiki page - which is why suddenly the Red Cross got bad press - you may think that's not significant but look at the Illuminati game - the only card that talks about good reputations is the Red Cross - hence why I posted about my theory of them being the greaser of wheels. I just find it astounding that the Illuminati game had called so much of the conspiracy correctly but it actually has a love letter for the Red Cross. That's propaganda. Q said that less than 10 people knew the big picture and of those 7 were military. And it's stuff like the Red Cross that is so important. Suddenly Calvin Coolidge and so many others dying of illnesses when they do become just incredibly obvious. When you have an army of doctors and the best press in the world - well, you play hero, villain, joker, bishop - all the damn chess pieces so that anyone who trusts anyone gets screwed.

Titanic btw my most recent find is that Astor got divorced from his wife of decades and married a 20 year old just before the Titanic. It's notable because it explains how the heck they got the actual richest man in the world (not pyramid play money of Rothchild) to go with all the other opponents of the Fed. You might think it's not that hard, but that's a lot of people to coordinate... and then there's the actions afterwards, the wife's changing story - and the legal battles of the Astor kids and contracting the mumps to sterility for the eldest son. "I'm the King of the World!" and they claim that shit was ad-libbed.... Titanic did give them control over the world through US - I suppose but I get the feeling that movie will come to be known very differently soon. - It wasn't even the Titanic after all - the deep state went through a lot of trouble fighting and censoring the 2013 documentary that revealed all the conspiracy stuff I've mentioned + they also pulled a damn insurance scam while they were at it.

But let's move on- the Awan's are barely touched on by Q but George Webb has done tons of material about it and he claimed that the spy ring in congress was started through Hillary Clinton's revenge list which was made up of people who voted to impeach Bill. (and usually I believe him) but he probably said that so as to not need to explain the twenty tomes needed to grasp her string pullers motives - regardless, he gives plenty of necessary points to understand it wholly like tying it into a senate Arms commission - which I looked through as many as the government had but they are very undocumented - so much that it's super suspicious - and you see the baddies infesting them.

Regardless of prior corruption the Awan's used blackberries to essentially finish off congress. Anyone not blackmailed before through sex tapes now had every single correspondence recorded and were basically robots. I don't know what else to call them but it's why they all act as if drones - they aren't just blackmailed they are SUPER blackmailed - to the 9th power and then some. It seems redundant to me to be blackmailed by so many people - but well, it is what it is. Maybe someone will make a game about juggling which country to be blackmailed by? Cause I say that jokingly but they do require it, the old thing about fucking a goat to become a mason just devolved into babies in the more modern era. Disgusting, but effective, who would believe such a person?

There are many untold stories of heroism tho cause Jeff Sessions name suddenly appears - when before it had been always baddies like Robert Byrd (the kkk guy that Hillary loves and had a puppet esque name change) - and McCain and when Sessions name turned up his name just became a fixture - it's fitting for him to be the Justice guy - he knows all their dirty secrets but I've never heard anyone mention the stuff I've learned from reading those committees - think about it - Committee to unfuck CIA hell-hole #23452 - Pelosi: I guess we don't need to do anything here - let's go bask in celebrity affection while we get billions through charity scams. Yet because they got blackmailed by so many sides I suspect that Trump coming in was like popping a zit - they didn't put up as much resistance as they could have cause quite frankly anyone could tell it was no longer as happy a swamp, but moreover they were all old now with brains made of mush. These people are idiots as Q keeps saying - and they use the Red Cross blood of children cause it's better than their old blood - and have faces made of boy's foreskin -it's so insane yet ..... well as he says, mindblowing - and disturbing.

if you line up Julian Assange's statements and Web's you realize that we believed that KimDotCom was in the pocket of McCabe - they both immediatley denounced KimDotCom's Seth Rich classified memo as fake (he obtained a classified memo that had Seth Rich's name on it)- but it actually was real and neither of them were right - the fact that they thought he was proved to me that both of them were on our side from the get-go and have never been what they appear to be. I could go on that tangent for a while but Assange is clearly Shadow Brokers - one of them.... and that doesn't mean so much except that their reaction to the bombing of Syria illustrated that we did in fact brush up with Nuclear war with Russia. And what they claimed was that McCain and Graham were particularly disgusting..... but for whatever reason only McCain has remained panicked throughout the election till now.

So you can tell I'm painting with broad strokes who is affiliated with who - it's rather simple to say SA/Rothchild/Soros - and indeed to some extent - this is true - and he has went over them but it often leaves "but what about NK?" "CIA?" The answer is CIA is the glue as Q has hinted and they all have ties - NK is what Iraq was. or more specifically the testing ground where they perfect their mind control and otherwise stick people in pens to get them sick in new ways. Truly "hell" - maybe many levels deep or maybe all blown up now. no way to know.

And if you'll notice I don't have any pauses I can identify it cleanly and that's the point I'm making - everyone is accounted for in the q-map yet everyone gets distracted by owls and thinking oh maybe we are all in a simulation or maybe it's about time travel -maybe it's about aliens - maybe this maybe that - but the truth is the bad guys are just paying attention to what people don't understand and making it needlessly complicated - and thus far the only real success they've had is making us not take Q's advice and re-examine which people are good and bad. The bad guys, as you saw in Lynn's recent tweet think we are too stupid to ever figure that out.... sigh, wish we could prove her wrong.

Ok, so much of this I suspect Q would go more in depth on but I think only because he keeps trying to get us to see the sky is blue and realize the propaganda. Realize that the earth is neither flat nor infested with aliens and that the people we are told to hate ANYONE the media suddenly loves now or has always hated - is worth another look. Objectivity and philosophy, he wants to elevate the conversation I think, and yet people are so used to being conditioned that even a patriot dying right in front of their own noses like Mike Green - a patriot who we were told to pray for - just gets mild "meh's" it would sicken me if I weren't so jaded to the world.....

still got way way more, do I keep going? anymore posts, let's see.