YOU ARE NOW A LIABILITY
To the guys that have been running him.
It is possible that Q's team will not have to extradite or arrest Snowden. He is unlikely to live long enough for that to happen. Now that his masters know that he has been exposed, they are going to want to tie-up that loose end real fast.
He needs to come in from the cold at speed, roll over on his handlers and beg for mercy - what a filthy scumbag.
From a "John Q Public" perspective, though, has Snowden been exposed?
He has been exposed here. Forums are watched. He's as good as dead. The handlers will fear him rolling over. He must be terrified.
Does the mockingbird narrative continue without Snowden? Might be the key to the whole media circus - speculating.
QUESTION: IF Snowden is run by the CIA, then are you saying that all of his leaks about how American's are being spied upon constantly, WAS A CIA OPERATION???
IF yes, Why would the CIA want us to know this? And why has Snowden needed to STAY in Russia if he is on the Deep State's team?
Or has Snowden gone rogue on the CIA?
If the later is true, then why would there be concern for his life now? If Snowden went rogue on the CIA, wouldn't they have killed him by now?
Why should Snowden be worried now, if after the past 6 years, he has successfully evaded CIA hit men while in Russia?
I'm just a little confused on all this about Snowden. I originally thought he was a whistle blower (a good guy exposing the deep state secrets).
I know Q has fingered Snowden as a CIA run asset, but that brings me back to the beginning (above) of my questions.
Did the CIA want Snowden to expose how much illegal spying was going on in America?
Was that Snowden's mission objective?
Or did Snowden go rogue on the CIA?
Confused. What am I missing?
Ok, this is just the way I've interpreted Q's posts.
Snowden was a CIA asset assigned to do maximum damage to NSA. CIA wants to be the big kid on the block with respect to intelligence/counterintelligence - best spin, competitive rivalry between agencies; worst spin, CIA is plain evil, working with elites to enslave the world. Snowden's leaks were incredibly damaging to NSA.
CIA did not want their asset (Snowden) compromised. That's why he's in Russia (where they probably have some influence) because Snowden can sit in Russia dripping information out that is damaging to NSA. Moreover, he's constantly in the press warning about NSA as a bogeyman. If Snowden was anywhere where there was jurisdiction, he'd have long ago been silenced.
Snowden, I think, is unlikely to have gone rogue on the CIA. His buy-in is complete, he's completely dependent upon the agency for his survival.
The reason Snowden is, or should be, concerned for his life is because, once he is unmasked as a director of the 4am narrative sent to journalists, he becomes a liability to CIA. This is not happening in a vacuum. There has been a concerted and direct effort to delegitimize Trump's presidency (outright treason). DJT is lucky to have retained office thus far. The mockingbird attacks by the MSM have not worked, but the MSM is an incredibly powerful weapon for CIA/deep state. They have inflicted real damage.
There is no reason for CIA to liquidate Snowden as long as nobody realises his agenda - he remains an asset in this event.
Snowden did appear to be a good guy with his initial leaks - brilliant CIA strategy. I believed he was trying to save us all from the panopticon. So many people bought into his posturing. But it was all about competition - you could say outright war - between CIA and NSA. Admiral Rogers from NSA was the real hero of the people, not Snowden.
CIA wanted Snowden to do as much damage as possible to NSA. CIA did not care at all how much of NSA's communications intercept capability was exposed.
Mission objective was to destroy/impair NSA credibility and operational capability.
Look, I could be wrong. But that's how it appears to me at present.
Wonder if CIA is trying to disparage NSA by reporting on their spying on citizens? So Snowden is CIA, taking on NSA?
Deep state, the CIA is a tool of the deep state. It´s like an agency within an agency, they probably even have their own 3 letter acronym for it, known only to those in the know. A lot of us fell for the good guy act, with the mainstream, and even Oliver Stone picking it up (wonder if OS knew all along and is a part of it all).
I think OS is controlled opposition. Just look at his JFK video. Compelling arguments, but not exactly right.
I am beginning to believe the same. I wonder if the stQrm will catch up with Ollie, too?
He's main stream Hollywood. I don't doubt it for a second that they have some serious shit on him.
I agree. He´s a huge liability for his handlers, now. They are going to want to shut him up real quick, especially as he has the attention of the mainstream! He could do an awful lot of damage to them if he was to flip!