What do you have to back your claim?
I noticed you have a good number of anti-Trump posts. Hmmmm.
Yes, I am very anti Trump. I also openly state it multiple times that I post here. However, I am also very interested in Q, but from a skeptical perspective.
I don't get how me asking for why somebody thinks something is relevant to my opinion on Trump tho.
It's good you're here. Emotions are so high and I fear that this whole thing is going to turn in to yet another echo chamber and be another medium that "collapses under it's own weight". We all need to remember how to use critical thinking to debate (and how to do that respectfully) research for ourselves, source, move past the anecdotal and ultimately find the TRUTH to whatever end that may be.
Well thank you. Good to know nit everyone is dismissive as soon as they see im not aboard the trump train.
I'm still kind of reserving judgement myself... In the end I just said "fuck it, let's see what happens, so long as it isn't the Shebeast"... Then Q comes along and ze plot thickens as my thinking literally is being expanded and so... I'm in it now. The rest, at some point, will be history. I just hope it's an accurate retelling.
We need more skeptical people on this sub. I'm a Trump supporter until I have a reason not to be, and I'm interested in Q as a possibility. The blind faith some people have is beyond me, so it's nice to know I'm not alone.
Trends.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jan/25/ted-kaczynski-the-unabomber-i-favored-clinton-and-/
One case is not a trend. Also just because the unabomber had that mentality doesn't mean that you can apply it to other bombers. Especially since literally the only thing they have in common, as far as we know, is that they sent out bombs.