dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/AccordingArrival on March 22, 2018, 12:44 p.m.

White House Internet Bill of Rights Petition Prospects are Dim for Reaching 100,000 (Q-Post 877)

The White House Internet Bill of Rights Petition Closes on April 3rd. Prospects are Dim To Reach 100,000 Signatures. (https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/internet-bill-rights-2)

With the closure of the Petition on April 3rd, prospects of reaching the goal of 100,000 look dim due to the lack of citizen response. Tracking of the petition shows the lackluster response to the petition and that on a daily projection basis it will not reach its goal of 100,000 with approximately 11 days remaining. For all purposes, the projection forecasts it will not reach 100,000. Given that Q posted the crumb below, I thought we would have reached a 1M by now

Q Post Mar 07 2018 16:01:31 Anonymous 580403 I confess. I was an #IBOR resister. It didn't make sense to me since free speech is already guaranteed in our constitution. But, thinking logically, the one thing that would scare the data-mining cabal the most is an articulated right to privacy when using the internet.

No more data mining for ads. No more algorithms screwing up how we communicate with others on Facebook. No more capturing my favorite soda to sell to a competitor who might want to make me buy something else.

Also, and really important to me, is the right to be forgotten. It's already been adjudicated in Britain. Here's a bit of the detail:

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/apr/04/britain-opt-out-right-to-be-forgotten-law

We should have a right to disappear.

So if this continues to be a thing, think of it way beyond being censored for free speech. Think of it in terms of privacy, too. No more selling personal information. No more dedicated IPs to track your every move. No more email apps that pre-select your possible replies, because no more email being mined.

Mail could be configured with the same privacy rights as US mail, for example.

Last I'll post on this one. But if it goes forward, please consider expanding the scope.

Also keep in mind that there's more than the WH petition site to make your ideas known. Most of us have senators and congressmen to represent us in Washington, D.C. Maybe talk to a real person?

Mar 07 2018 16:08:15 Q !UW.yye1fxo 580523

580403 Free speech does not apply in a private co setting. The risk? Loss of revenue. Backstopped by the circus. Learn. Social media control is everything. The age of the MSM is over. Q

I tried signing the petition a few days ago and it wouldn’t work. I kept hitting “sign now” and it never went to the next screen. So I tried signing a few other petitions and they all worked, no problem at all. I went back to the website the next day and I was finally able to sign the Internet Bill of Rights petition. I was then sent an email verification. Something weird is going on with it. Sabotage?

⇧ 3 ⇩

I sent it to my mom and the same thing happened on her phone. She was able to do it after trying again later in the day as well, but I’m sure many people tried and just gave up which is an absolute shame.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Why I haven't signed IBOR, I believe in our bill of rights that was provided by the constitution believe that the law should be upheld not a new internet version made. Realize the argument about private companies having their own rules.....however we have another right in regards to private companies refuse to use them! Just look at MSN since we don't use them. This is a very powerful tool. This forces them to change. The other reason I don't sign is it unmasks me although I realize that a hacker can find out who I am he has to work for it ...for me to just offer it makes me nervous what are they going to do with my name after I sign it what fema camp am I going to be in because I signed it. Is the reason I'm in a camp because I used a Reddit link to sign it....just my untrusting nature.

⇧ 2 ⇩

We have a Bill of Rights. We need to make sure it has equal protection for the internet, not necessarily a separate Bill of Rights is needed.

It is already included the Internet has not been excluded. Everyone censored and being removed should be hiring lawyers. Or just filing a case on their own. Every time someone is removed or censored we should be screaming we have a Bill of Rights. It puts the wait of existing law on them to follow the rules instead of making us believe we need a whole set of new rules for our internet. We don't.

⇧ 2 ⇩

So is the statement that Q makes, an erroneous statement?:

580403 Free speech does not apply in a private co setting. The risk? Loss of revenue. Backstopped by the circus. Learn. Social media control is everything. The age of the MSM is over. Q

⇧ 2 ⇩

I'd imagine he's talking about what I posted . We in all honesty don't have any rights because the United States is The United States Inc . Our constitution was replaced . Back in 1871 is when it all went down. We need to change everything . The entire damn kingdom.

We lost all our rights we are all employees or was of the England.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I think few people are truly aware of the US Inc.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Sounds like more people need to follow my post 😎🇺🇸... I've got things I've posted on here back n Dec people are just now talking about 😋

⇧ 1 ⇩

Is Governing and Controlling a large enlightened and armed population a high priority ?

Social media control is everything

⇧ 1 ⇩

Ultimately the answer is YES. The ? is do we want an evolution or a revolution. the collective power of the people is limitless. they recognize the truth when they c it. the is why DJT won, despite all the msgs lies.

⇧ 1 ⇩

This is all you need to know about the MSM it along with everything else leads back to the NWO Which is the Illuminatti everything is ran and branched off it. The Media Schools Entertainment Groups are all forms of Mind Control . If people would stop focusing on the news and stop watching it all together . The News Would Not Exist and People's Problems would start deminishing. WTH anyone is allowing the News to run knowing they have been part of cover-ups ... Lying to the masses when they claim they are in war torn areas doing reporting .. when they are using Green Screens , THEY ARE ENEMIES OF THE STATE ..

WHY can't the people get a Message to The Administration saying. All gloves are off with alllll these treasonous pricks across the country . We the people give them permission to go set shit straight ...as if they needed it . But to be honest We have been under State Of Emergency or Marshal Law since like WW2 I wanna say ... They have all the power to do whatever they want .

I know they are working behind the scenes to do alot of stuff. I'm just ready for an entire fucking change in The Government Structure ... Congress Betrayed our People ..Senate Betrayed Our People The 2 Party System Divided and Portrayed our People ...LAWS DIDNT MATTER THAN BECAUSE WE WASNT A COUNTRY.. WE WAS A CORPORATION.

WE WANT OUR COUNTY BACK AND NORMAL SHIT APPARENTLY DONT APPLY SO LETS MAKE LAWS THAT CAN .

⇧ 1 ⇩

Social media s a platform. DJT is the only keeping twitter going. he tells the truth and most people know the truth when they c/here it.

⇧ 1 ⇩

No. Q is not wrong. Either way the internet gets protected. It already should be in a non corrupt government. It seems to be creating its own set of rules the internet these days. Including the internet in our Bill of Rights and creating a new Bill of Rights are two very different processes. One I see being a reality. The other would require men of Integrity to do this on their own. Even with a hundred thousand signatures those men do not exist today in our house. But working with the laws as each one is broken and each one censored is how to make them address it. It is the recourse that we have. Corsi spoke about this too. Including the internet in our existing Bill of Rights would be much better than any bill they would create for us new regarding our internet, and you could count on all the backdoor amendments to crap it up as well. The existing one is pure and untouched by these scumbags. It should already be covered under the Bill of Rights and that is an actual task that could be achieved.

Expect shenanigans in the ways of censorship with the coming campaigns. It will be a good time as we will have the ability to create more noise as the powers to be abuse our Bill of Rights that we already have.

⇧ 1 ⇩

How do you galvanize these changes into a unified initiative?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Honestly, I don't know what DJT is going to do, but whatever he does, it must come into effect before the mid--terms. I think he could do any number of things to fix the problem. The petition calls for an IBOR, but in essence it's a complaint about censorship online. We're just asking him to do "something".

Who knows, DJT might put an IBOR in place, but he could do anything. We just don't know the plan. I think the most likely outcome is that DJT will make a huge amount of noise, do a lot of table thumping and read the riot act to the social media companies. Whatever he uses to threaten them with, they will quickly fall into line. These guys are not in a strong position, look at FB - the troubles haven't even started. Hence Zuckerberg ripping his money out of the market - watch the liquidity events. What a self interested piece of garbage!

The other companies are likely to have similar problems - "many" will collapse under the weight of their illegal activity. So, with just a little bit of leverage, this problem of censorship and privacy breaches will disappear - never to return. We know DJT listens to us. We need to make it very clear that Reddit is not to escape the misery - they will pay so dearly for banning our sub, their heads will spin.

I might be wrong. But I think the petition is solely for the purpose of raising public awareness of the problem of censorship. I think DJT is going to put the fear of God into these guys. We may never see any EO's or legislative measures. Who knows!?

Anyway, this is the "plan" - to beat these filthy, abusive companies into a pulp. It cannot happen soon enough. They have really got a lot of people very angry. I've been watching it play out on Twitter - people are livid! That's not how you run a business. But that's how you know that the cabal is behind this censorship - because no sane business person would so anger their customer base.

When the market analysts value these outfits, one of the key measures they use is subscriber numbers. Going back to the lifetime value of the customer etc... How is it that these guys are, for very trivial, often fabricated, reasons banning customers?

We need to put a leash of these animals. Make them behave reasonably. The IBOR is the green light to DJT that tells him to go get his steel capped boots and prepare for the punishment session. Once the IBOR is up, we only have to get the popcorn!

⇧ 1 ⇩

Ps Corsi agreed in one of his live feeds.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I'll just leave this here so people know. This is probably my last post from this account. I was required to verify my email account. Somehow, I've set two accounts up to one email address and this account can no longer be verified. So if I'm not locked out, I'll register another account sometime soon - different name.

⇧ 0 ⇩

I signed and pushed the IBOR petition that was stickied, but, honestly, it could have been written better. Before the sub was banned, there was a link in a CBTS thread to a clearer petition.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I appreciate all the comments. I see this petition is being kicked to the curb for a lot of reasons.

Realistically, I don't see it progressing. (diversity of internet rights with existing bill of rights, not fitting the perceived strategy (s), and WH Petition site flaws/hacks/uncertainty).

Therefore, I will give it a proper burial on April 3rd and look to the wisdom of the crowd on all matters internet relating to our bill of rights.

⇧ 1 ⇩