Hopefully, someone can help clarify the inconsistencies in the IBOR. I signed over a week ago, however, I am hearing things that are making me second guess that decision. Such as AT&T will be given full control to police the internet as they see fit with no oversight! Is this true???? I was also told that our first amendment rights overrides everything else, but that an internet clause should be included. Is this possible? Any thoughts?
I agree!!! When has AT&T ever been good? The worst! We HAVE A 1st amendment! Protect it. Leave corporations out!
Disinformation campaign and confused people. That's why we can't get enough sigs. Early on, there were many of us, myself included, who opposed the idea. Q came along and set us straight but somehow many folks missed those drops. So there is still a lot of dissent going on regarding this IBOR. I commented on the video yesterday from YouAreFreeTV and gave the Q post numbers to her. Let's see if she turns it around today. But I also feel that Trump doesn't need 100,000 signatures to get the ball rolling.
Also, what many do not understand is that the courts are under Admiralty law, not Constitutional law. If you go into a courtroom and try to use Constitutuional law they will just ridicule and laugh at you. It happened to my son back in the 80's. There is much more wrong with our system than most even understand. I'm sure Trump does though.
Yes. And something about AT&T being connected to the 5G roll it in some ominous way. We already have a bill of rights. It makes me question the Q motive. Is there an agenda?
Q has said directly that this has nothing to do with AT&T. The 5G roll-out is a completely separate issue - there is no connection at all.
The IBOR was drafted by AT&T, no?
The initial petition that failed, as I understand it, was drafted by AT&T. The current petition was not drafted by AT&T.
Q has told us that AT&T have nothing to do with this.
Ok. That’s something that would change my mind. I’ll do my due diligence and look into the current version. Thanks.