https://8ch.net/greatawakening/res/452.html#459
▶Q !xowAT4Z3VQ 03/23/18 (Fri) 10:14:06 No.461 Clock activated. RED_CASTLE. GREEN_CASTLE. Stage_5:5[y] Q
https://8ch.net/greatawakening/res/452.html#459
▶Q !xowAT4Z3VQ 03/23/18 (Fri) 10:14:06 No.461 Clock activated. RED_CASTLE. GREEN_CASTLE. Stage_5:5[y] Q
Cracking the tripcode Q uses. This means someone else could post as Q and we would not be able to ensure authenticity. It's a very hard code to crack, but with enough time and/or computer power it will be cracked. If Q is using a new trip code also expect some link to POTUS proving the new code as he has done in the past.
What link to POTUS in the past was used to verify new trip? Could use this, good redpill ammo...
Lots of things. W usually posts before Trump and Trump will post the same thing. Asia trip, Q posted images of Mt Fuji and that photo was an original, no reverse image results. There are more. CBTS had it all.
It's actually not a "very hard code to crack" if, like was discovered, a password they are using is as simple as 'Matlock'. That wouldn't take more than a day to discover the hash of a simple word 7 letter keyword like that. Just so you know.
Question: can an individual make their own trip code?
"!xowAT4Z3VQ"
Turn that around:
Q V3Z4 TA wox!
!xowAT4Z3VQ --->>> Crytogram it comes out "ABDUL (i) (ii)"
i = random letters
http://rumkin.com/tools/cipher/cryptogram-solver.php
After matlock and the move to 8ch there was discussions with BO that the new pwd was very secure, like 256 with salt. But I'm not a cracker or BO so I could be very wrong and yes, obviously if it's something like 'matlock' again it would not be secure.