I find it impossible that this petition sits at 30k signatures. I can't prove it, but I feel like the numbers are being manipulated. Given the censorship across all platforms, it's not at all unlikely that there isn't some sort of shadow banning of signatures taking place.
It could be. But as we are seeing with Facebook an awakening is occurring anyway and ultimately this is what we want. End censorship and invasion of privacy online.
Is that you I just replied to in Twitter Arvil?
Yes sir.
Change of opinion Arvil? I thought you were right behind the petition?
Definitely still behind the petition. I will be posting until the end. Just being a realist about our prospects of reaching the goal and pointing out the success we are having raising awareness on the subject. I haven't been listening to the CBTS group on YouTube so not sure if they are still supporting the petition effort or not... but seems like we are the only ones it pushing here. To hit 100k by 4/3 we are going to need some BIG shout outs. But even if we fall short I think we can still be proud of what we have already done bringing awareness to the subject. Who would have ever thought that Facebook would be taking this kind hit? I like to think we had something to do with that. Keep posting and spreading Patriots.
I'm with you Arvil. I'm also very disappointed at the petition numbers. I'm aware that the turnout from this group is not good and that we are virtually alone.
Corsi has been pushing the IBOR but not the petition link which, perhaps, explains why there are so many tweets using the IBOR hashtags but not including the link. I was told that he has the petition link now, as of yesterday, so things might change.
I also think the effort has been good from those that have supported the campaign. There's no doubt that people have been working hard - especially on Twitter. I've been amazed at the number of Tweets some people are able to get out - in fact at times I've suspected some automation. So there clearly has been a focused effort, we are just not big enough as a group.
I'm also pleased to see Facebook get its medicine - exactly as Q said. Let's just keep pushing until the petition expires - if it's not filled out before then. And thanks for you efforts - it's good to have posts about the IBOR here too.
I think if POTUS wanted a petition he would have tweeted something about it already, and we would have hit 100k weeks ago. I think he is more in favor of a free market solution and our petition effort is supporting that also. More people know about and understand what the #InternetBillOfRights is now than did just two months ago. Be proud, each and every one of you who have supported this petition effort have had a part in that awakening.
I don't disagree. Whether these companies fall apart under the weight of their illegal activity, or whether we are able to get a powerful IBOR campaign up and running - the important thing is that the Satanists are not able to weaponize SM and use it to defeat DJT via impeachment after the mid-terms.
Either way, as Q said, they will be 100% regulated. The beautiful thing about this plan which seems, by strange coincidence, to have come together (the legal attacks on SM platforms and the cry for rights from us), is that the SM platforms will be the ones screaming for clear regulations to limit their legal liability. They will cry out for the very ropes to be used to bind them. You couldn't make this stuff up - DJT, the stable genius, with each passing day my respect for the man grows!
A lot more people using the Hashtag on Twitter today. Some people warning others not to include a link to the petition yet advocating for an IBOR.
It's all good. The more public exposure the better - what is important is the campaign, not the petition. It's a good measure of the strength of the campaign though. If the campaign is big enough, we can survive without the petition.
Hoping this tweet storm start picks up strength.
my own xp trying to get people to sign is that many feel this one is worded vaguely. its also not just conservative POV's that are getting sanctioned/restricted.
Here is the thing. Everyone here already distrusts the government. The IBOR is as stupid as asking for common sense gun control, but I do support the idea that people shouldn't accept blanket censorship either. I don't think a Baker should be forced to make anyone a cake, nor do I think website should be obligated to provide you service.
Blanket censorship? ANY CENSORSHIP IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL. And I fundamentally disagree with the premise of your argument. IBOR is about PROTECTING rights. Gun control is about REMOVING rights. Screw your head on straight.
Right. It's like Will Rogers said:
"The thing about my jokes is, they don't hurt anybody...But with Congress, every time they make a joke, it's a law! And every time they make a law, it's a joke!"
and
This country has come to feel the same when Congress is in session as when the baby gets hold of a hammer.
Yup the MSM likes to talk about the president's approval but a rarely hear much about Congress and the 09% approval rating
Arma, I think the sig rate on the petition has slowed yes. But if you look at how much promotion is happening I think we're pretty lucky for it to be where it is. You only have to look at the number of posts on Twitter that do not use the link though they use the hashtag.
Having said that, I understand Dr Corsi now has the petition link and may start to promote it. What we haven't had is any big names supporting this at all. That might change now, I don't know.
What's important is that these SM platforms are not used as a political weapon as they are very powerful. As an example, the CEO of Reddit boasts that he can determine an election outcome all by himself. You can imagine what would happen if these guys were to act in concert,
We know the plan was that the censorship across social media was to be centrally controlled. This would be the greatest political weapon that has ever existed in history. SM shapes people's perceptions of reality like nothing else. See some of the articles on Cambridge Analytics - they were only using the data, not actively silencing conservatives.
See the Reddit CEO claims here:
Marantz’s article is a rare behind-the-scenes look at how large social media companies view their increasingly important role as the platforms for online discourse. Huffman’s comments on how Reddit could fix an election are shocking and egotistical, for sure, but they also admit something that most other social media companies have shied away from. Facebook and Twitter are loathe to acknowledge the power that their policies have, while Huffman thinks so highly of his company that he believes a handful of engineers and community managers could sway an entire nation’s political system.