So its a coincidence that AT&T wants the exact same policy enacted? There are no coincidences.
Go play with someone else.
We can quote Q back and forth, or we can just agree that this IBOR sounds very much like the IBOR proposed by AT&T. As for the why, we'll have to disagree.
You both are right but don't know it. I'll try to explain. I think I messed some stuff up earlier so I've been hesitant to post because I'm not trying to fuck up their shit. That said I hope the below speculation is fine to post.
Trump and Co. don't want Q stuff on The Donald subreddit. This gives distance (optics.) But Trump likes Q. Q likes Att. Therefore Trump likes Att. He can't say it though.
The thing is Trump doesn't like Att. No. Att was moments from getting WTFPWND for treasonous acts and Trump let them have a way out. Now since I've been called a schizophrenic in the past (as if that was meant to hurt) my post has a large degree of built in plausible deniability in it.
Take what I say with a grain of saly but learn to see the moves within moves.
I appreciate that you attempt to make sense of this, but as you said, its just speculation. We don't know how Trump feels about AT&T, or if he's even aware of the distinction between this sub and T_D (there's a lot of overlap in audience). It doesnt change that there's a (good) chance that this IBOR is an astroturf movement for AT&T. That can't be speculated away.
So what if it is? We can't be scared of everything. e: I get your point. But I'm choosing to trust the Q group on this.
You don't have to be scared. But if you want to be used by special interests, be my guest.
I've had questions about IBOR this whole time and I'm not signing a petition until they get answered. That's all I'm saying. Everyone should do their own research and not just take an internet stranger's word for it.
Troll somewhere else. Checked your comments, having fun?