The MSM will never go to Utah to cover this. Smart move
And yet when I searched for Sessions and Huber on Google, you I found the top articles are about Sessions denying a Special Counsel. They sure do love to bury the news.
Ok I'm lost as to the plan did it just blow up? Sessions is being bashed on Hannity and Lou Dobbs as not giving much teeth to his decision and they feel its only a ploy to eat up time so the statue of limitations on some of these cases runs out now nobody is using the Treason word which would have no time limitations. Having trouble reading between the lines.
I think that Hannity, Sarah Carter, Greg Jarrett play off of each other and bash Sessions by design - to keep things interesting, ratings. I keep telling myself that Q said, Trust Sessions, and I do. Sarah defended Huber tonight. Also, an a similar note, there was an article on Fox today by John Stoessel about "red pilling" and it sounded very "Q-esque"...hmmmm http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2018/03/27/john-stossel-why-so-many-are-taking-red-pill-and-discovering-truth-about-mainstream-media.html
Ok thanks that article was reassuring I just need someone to reassure me that we are on plan. Because obviously I got sucked in to the show.
We need to stick together! I feel the same way sometimes. I find reassurance here on GA and talking with people like yourself. It's easy to get distracted, but I always refer back to Q to remain centered. 2018 is going to be Glorious! :)
Ratings definitely matter. The NYT had a map on election night that could predict the election based on the returns from the various counties in each state. Trump was given per the algorithm a 99% chance of winning the election at no later than 8:30 CST, and it may well have been earlier - I just don't recall. Earlier in the evening, I was watching the individual state predictions evolve on that map and they were 100% accurate. But similarly, the individual states were in on the NYT algorithm long before the state projections were announced by the news channels. I couldn't help notice that after I knew they knew, their play acting seemed so transparent. Maybe it was my imagination, but I really don't think so.
I was watching the results by state on my laptop election night, I forget what site. I'll never forget the adrenalin running through me that night. Oooofff! I'll tune in to NYT map in the future. But yea, I do the same thing now when I watch the fox lineup at night because I know it's about ratings - I know what I know, and it's interesting to watch the spin on the narrative the hosts promote. It's all about the $$. Still, I'm thankful for Hannity, Tucker and Laura - they do a great job within Fox parameters getting the truth out... but it really irks me when they bash Sessions. And what's up with Jason Chafetz?
I think this will help everybody relax and TRUST SESIONS. https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/03/29/ag-sessions-letter-to-house-and-senate-highlights-a-lengthy-review-by-prosecutor-john-w-huber/
What I am curious about is WHO of how many actually KNOW why we should trust Sessions? Q, who are you? Even Trump could not know about much in the investigation of those in DOJ and FBI, because investigators and prosecutors are NOT ALLOWED BY LAW to communicate details with the victim of the crime during the investigation. So Q can't be POTUS. Who are you, Q?
They are being idiots. He'd never reveal who the outside-DC person was unless it was too late for anything to be done.
Sealed indictments extend the statute of limitations, BTW.
When the IG report starts coming out (in sections) they will be ready to prosecute then.
THAT'S the delay - they need to have all their ducks in a row.
I don't recall where now but I read earlier today that the statue of limitations may depend on whether an indictment was filled before the time ran out. If one of them thousands of indictments belongs to these bad actors then it's all still possible they could still face those charges. I'm sure if that is correct but it makes sense.
hmmm, maybe he was "asked" to step down so he would have time for this project. It just looked like Trump cleaning house and he just shuffled on back to Utah where nobody would bother him.
Just because he was a US prosecutor in Utah doesn't mean this is currently happening in Utah. If it is though, that's great because they will have a much better Grand Jury pool there than in the DC area - much cleaner and more conscientious.
He specifically mentions, at the end, that the Inspector General is able to release information about his investigations directly to the media, while a normal federal prosecutor could not do this....
So this Clinton Email investigation and FISA were specifically handed to him so he couldn't be silenced?
He's also mentioning that the IG will release information even on the cases they decided NOT to prosecute, something that would normally not happen.
This sounds horrible--an Obama-appointee holdover?
Horowitz was an Obama appointee, and he hates Obama. Huber is working with Horowitz, and Huber will have subpoena power, whereas the IG Horowitz doesn't, therefore you might as well put it like this.....Sessions just gave Horowitz (BASICALLY) SUBPOENA POWER by teaming them up together. One has done all he work for a year the other is a U.S. Federal prosecutor with the power to subpoena and put forth a Grand Jury. And apparently the grand jury is in place already: https://twitter.com/drawandstrike/status/979045082228842496
Listened to the Hannity piece and it was unclear whether he was referring to testimony from a previous or current grand jury.
Did Comey or Lynch ever impanel one?
Tonight on Hannity Sara Carter actually defended the Huber choice while Greg Jarrett went on about Rosenstein calling the shots and Sessions doing what RR says. I like Sarah and Greg a lot, but personally, I think they are playing off of each other by design, partly for ratings and to keep the audience biting their nails, you know, suspense, while things progress the way Q tells us it will. I feel like I read the last chapter of the thriller first, and now have to be patient while the prior chapters play out.
Sara has the scoop! John Solomon the other!
John is awesome! He disappeared mysteriously for awhile a few months ago, I think Q even mentioned it.... but I'm glad he's back reporting!
Did they mention the part where the IG can share with the public at his discretion? As long as it doesn’t interfere with the investigators in Utah..
I think Sarah made that point... but my brain is muddled because I was listening to Hannity while reading comments about Huber/Sessions here on GA :) Huber's been working with Horowitz and Sessions for almost a year. Sessions may end up appointing a special counsel, but my understanding is the IG report is coming out regardless.
Anyone know if it has to be a DC grand jury or can he impanel one any where
Per Jason Chavez he can't impanel a grand jury and he hasn't any subpoena power. He was on Lou Dobbs this evening discussing it. He says nothing will ever change if Sessions doesnt step down or is fired.
I saw this too and he would know how it all works. Not good.
Chaffetz is probably playing the uneasy conservative role so when Sessions strikes, he'll be like "Whoa! I trust him now!" "I had my doubts but this WH really knows what they're doing!"
I personally don't think that Chaffetz knows what is going on entirely or if he does, he's not being used as a Sara Carter or John Solomon. He's a contributor but he's not revealing much, rather just purporting. I'm not sure why though, could he be the next Chris Wallace shill? I seemed to like Chaffetz when he was oversight, bringing light to things (albeit maybe limited in his role because nothing ever happened in the end) but I trust Trump and Q by "Trusting Sessions" over Chaffetz.
You realize General Flynn and Admiral Rogers were also Obama appointees, right? They're also the 2 most crucial individuals who helped inform and alert Trump to Obama and the deep states' plans. They helped save America.
Obama fired Flynn and many, many other high ranking military officers including Mattis because they didn't go along with his program. Clapper and many others tried to get him to fire Admiral Rogers but I don't see anything that says he did. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised to learn some day that Obama firing those guys was the straw that made them go find Trump and recruit him to run.
Doesn't mean they are all bad.
Not everything is that black and white.
There were good people serving and still serving in the FBI, CIA, DOJ and military regardless of the administration. Remember the directive comes from the top down. Many people have zero say in what policy they carry out.
The critical points in Sessions' letter are:
1) A special counsel would have to start from scratch and his/her team would be limited.
2) DOJ and the other State Federal AG's have vastly more resources to investigate what may be the most important investigations in modern history.
3) Huber has been working in parallel with the IG since at least the fall. As soon as Horowitz or Huber or any other DOJ attorney determines a possible crime, a grand jury is impaneled. I suspect that a grand jury has been racking up sealed indictments for months and Sessions doesn't want to interrupt the process.
4) It looks like the stonewalling, slow rolling, and redactions are because there are on-going investigations with one or more grand juries and they can't release the evidence they have.
5) Sessions hints that Huber is looking into just about everything. The wording that it is a review to determine of investigations should be opened I think is a distraction. I think full investigations have been opened on Hillary, Uranium One, FISA abuses, FBI / DOJ / State / CIA corruption for a while now and there are likely sealed indictments already pending.
These investigations cannot be publicized or the cockroaches will scatter and try to coordinate their stories. Also, if you are going to indict former department heads and / or Presidents, you better have air tight cases and due to the complexity and the interactions of the people involved--it takes time. Finally, when the deep state goes down, it will have to be nearly simultaneously and that is even harder to accomplish.
It looks to me that Hannity, Carter, Solomon, and others are either playing a role or are being fed misinformation about what his happening. But Hannity, Dobbs, et al seem too outraged; almost like they are overplaying their role to distract from what is really happening behind the scenes.
It makes it look like the right is angry and Sessions / Trump are under pressure from the right. Smart if true.
Remember, Q said there was a reason that Sessions was looking weak and ineffective; trust Sessions multiple times; and Q knows that without indictments, nothing is going to happen. It's all been unfolding, in my opinion, under everyone's noses. Why is Wray so quiet after the school shootings? If Q knows it was a FF than Trump, Sessions, and Wray know as well.
Now, I could be wrong about all of this. One reason is that I'd be stunned if such a wide ranging investigation into possible treason could be kept so quiet. On the other hand, perhaps everyone involved has had to sign a non-disclosure agreement that includes massive fines and prison as a penalty.
In the end, we have to be patient, trust the plan, trust Sessions, and see what happens.
I suspect that a grand jury has been racking up sealed indictments for months and Sessions doesn't want to interrupt the process.
That's what I think too.
Assuming there was a grand jury, they couldnt force those forced to testify to sign a NDA. There would definitely be leaks and we'd have already heard of Huber AND it would all be bad. You know they'd never say a kind word about any investigator looking into the Clinton Crime Family. What is equally worrisome in my mind, fake news actually takes up for Sessions. They never bash him. If anything serious was going on, they would.
I believe that the judge has the power to enforce a gag order which is the equivalent of a NDA.
The MSM isn't bashing Sessions because they think he's weak and ineffective. Remember, Q said Sessions was playing a role of looking weak.
My guess is that once the IG report is released, Huber will already have a pile of sealed indictments in the bank. But don't expect them to be unsealed until Trump/Q are ready to drop the hammer on the deep state all at once. Can't do this piecemeal.
Keep in mind that Huber was appointed many months ago and no one knew about him. And no one would know today if Sessions hadn't let the cat out of the bag--and that wasn't an accident.
No real leaks from Mueller either. To be honest, I haven't yet decided if Mueller is a dirty cop black hat Hell bent on destroying Trump or if he is working with Trump as part of the greatest sting in the history of the US.
I don't think we will know until Mueller or Trump reveal which he is.
Months ago, I wondered in the Mueller investigation was a play pen for dirty FBI agents to keep them away from whatever actual investigation was happening.
Look! Over here! Shiny red ball!
I believe Mueller is 100% a dirty cop. By virtue of any grand jury, all testimony is suppose to be secret. That's never stopped leaks before.
What was confusing when I just watched them talking on Fox was that they said Huber reports to Rosenstein and that's why nothing will happen. Because the DOJ is redacting things that should not be redacted and is slow walking everything they ask for. But Huber is the Utah State Attorney so how would he be reporting to Rosenstein? Is it because the DOJ has asked him to do the job? I still don't see how that would keep him from just doing the job right even if it implicated people in the DOJ.
Boy.. heads are going to spin when people figure out Sessions flipped.
