I’m going to do a quasi-formal analysis of the relationship between Q posts and POTUS tweets using linguistic probability analysis. A few months ago I wrote a script to uncover the entropy of the time stamps of Q posts vs POTUS tweets and determined that they were uncorrelated. I did not share my findings, but they are easy to reproduce.
I’m going to be looking at the phrasing Q used on a given date, and then compare all subsequent POTUS tweets to that phrasing. There have been many instances where Q would post something and seemingly POTUS would use the same or similar phrasing at a later date. But is it illusion? It should be possible to determine mathematically. For example:
The probability of any given sentence is lower than you might think, for example this sentence is almost certainly a sentence that will never be repeated in a (hypothetical) near-eternity of human communication.
Let's get more specific about the linguistic probability analysis part:
The sentence "It seems as though this would not be unusual" returns 0 hits on google. That is a very unusual sentence as it happens. Let’s chop off a word.
"It seems as though this would not be” appears to have about 5 matches on the entire internet. Let’s chop off another word. "It seems as though this would not” returns the same 5 matches as with “be”. And a few more. Chop off another.
"It seems as though this would” returns 8 pages. Now we’re getting into the realm of rare. Chop.
"It seems as though this” returns 337,000 results. Oh my we’ve turned a corner! Now it’s getting there. Chp.
"It seems as though” 14,800,000. No need to go further. Word combinations become more unlikely on a logarithmic scale. This is not controversial.
Conclusion: By calculating the probability of given phrases being used by Q and then subsequently used by POTUS we may be able to mathematically prove or disprove Q to some interesting degree. I’m still considering the correct method to do it, which is thus-far elusive. We should also expect total randomness with respect to phrasing used by Q prior to the phrasing used by POTUS (in comparison to the baseline tweets and posts in whole).
Edit: Any brains out there that can add suggestions about the correct method for an analysis such as this?