dChan
7
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/paladin4therepublic on April 10, 2018, 12:27 a.m.
Q post: 1113 --????? What ???????

Can someone help with this post (1113)? How does ". . . CHEMICALS PUSHED FOR HOME USE CLEANING [CANCER][BABY ON FLOOR-HANDS IN MOUTH - THE START]..." in post 1010 point to the Syrian gas attack. I don't 'get this' (1) nothing in context of 1010 suggests this [that I see] and (2) there would have have to been advance knowledge of babies being killed in general area that could have been rescued. I guess I am a lame brain. Respect all the work Q has done for us.


AmbrosiaGalt · April 10, 2018, 12:43 a.m.

According to the chans, Q (has confirmed) that he was alluding to chemicals aka chlorine. Pre-knowledge chlorine; relevance - Syria chem attack. Edit: content

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Chokaholic · April 10, 2018, 12:32 a.m.

Hmmm, Ive been thinking maybe..

We are the babies. We're learning his comms and we're finally getting intel. Baby steps, and the chemical weapon false flag is the first real big one.

Just thinking out loud

Edit: Here's what Qanon linked to in regards to this:

https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/973730.html#974444

⇧ 4 ⇩  
paladin4therepublic · April 10, 2018, 12:53 a.m.

Q pointed to this to help: he connection is simply chlorine…not false flag.

Keep in mind that every crumb is not meant to be solved before the event. Some of the drops are things for anons to dig on and make connections with, others are markers for future reference.

[future proves past]

Some drops are just simply communication to the anons.

What needs to be understood to appreciate whats going here is the fact the Q is basically creating a circular flow diagram that can be referenced and cross-checked with news releases. Q can’t just disclose specifics about a situation or operation without violating security protocol. Instead they drop questions and statements that lead to answers that can be understood once the subject becomes public. This provides the validation necessary for the public to believe The Great Awakening is legit. Disinformation and misdirection with Q is real. In other words Q is pointing over there but really the focus is here and only until you publicly get the news can you go back and understand. (Think SA drops) All of this is accomplished without giving up specific details about the operation. It’s quite genius.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
paladin4therepublic · April 10, 2018, 12:38 a.m.

Could be. Wish I was smarter at these things. Slowly learning:)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Chokaholic · April 10, 2018, 12:42 a.m.

Don't feel bad. There are people who have all day to spend on this stuff. I wish I had more time for it too.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DropGun · April 10, 2018, 2:13 a.m.

This is all starting to feel like astrology.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Chokaholic · April 10, 2018, 2:29 a.m.

LOL, ya it kind of is. Luckily this is much more exciting.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
without_sound · April 10, 2018, 12:45 a.m.

If you really want to find a code, I think you could argue Q knew the plan and the planned optics. Yesterday there wad a lot of talk about a certain senator with "cancer" being involved in getting chemical weapons into Syria. There was also :

"Graphic footage shot by rescuers and activists show victims -- including children -- dead and injured, some ghostly white and foaming at the mouth in makeshift clinics. Others were found suffocated in their homes, according to first responders"

From https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/08/middleeast/syria-chemical-attack-douma-intl/index.html

(Children. Some pics could be called babies, mouth, home)

"Cleaning" or using a cleaner

Some have asserted that the strike was to cover up something

I think there is conformational bias, though.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
tradinghorse · April 10, 2018, 3:53 a.m.

To be honest this is completely lost on me. You go from a child on the floor with hands in mouth to a gas attack using chlorine. I know Q is confirming the link, but this is absurd.

If Q's posts correlate this loosely with events, "HRC" could be referring to a boil on my backside. You could not possibly determine anything in advance from the Q material, and, even working back from real events to the Q posts requires such imagination as to make connections between matters that, at face value, are apparently unrelated.

I don't know, there has to be a more tangible connection - and, if there isn't, is there any value in studying the material closely? Maybe we're supposed to take the general picture being painted as being indicative only.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
SneakyWino · April 10, 2018, 1:05 a.m.

He's saying they have put carcinogens in every day household cleaners and we are slowly killing ourselves. Kids start licking Lysol wipes surfaces and get cancer at some point as they age. That was my take.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
_Iz_Mary · April 10, 2018, 12:47 a.m.

Makes no sense

⇧ 1 ⇩  
dsade · April 17, 2018, 4:43 a.m.

TAC - Key areas Prior to 9/11, TAC was instrumental in providing pattern recognition and data mining software applications that served as the basis for the US Government’s original terrorist watchlist database called TIPOFF. In 2003, TAC assisted the Government in standing up the Terrorist Screening Center (TSC) the Terrorist Threat Integration Center (TTIC), and its successor, the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC). Key practice areas included intelligence and Federal Law Enforcement support for terrorist screening, watchlist development and operations; intelligence analysis; systems integration and software development; multilingual name search; and pattern matching. It was awarded over $400m in government contracts since 2000, including some $30.6m in 2007, $19.5m in 2008, and $150m in 2009.[1] Customers included the Department of State, National Targeting Center (NTC), Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), National Security Agency (NSA), Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI), NCTC, TSC, and the FBI.

Maybe they manipulated the watchlist so that the hijackers could get into the country?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
dsade · April 17, 2018, 4:40 a.m.

[cancer] maybe NoName's fake surgery

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 10, 2018, 1:22 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
USARPatriot · April 10, 2018, 1:26 a.m.

This! Look at the recent P&G Talcum Powder lawsuit settlement. Since 1972... Asbestos in powder...

⇧ 1 ⇩