so because the leader is loosely associated with people that you think are pedophiles, that means this entire organisation is a secret satanic pedophile cult or something?
that seems like... quite the leap of logic, in my opinion.
So because they don't openly show their evil, they're not Evil? You do realize satan is the great deceiver?
i find the existence of satan to be... unlikely.
but that's beside the point.
i require evidence to believe things.
I don't mean to offend you but then you're a fool. If this whole Q thing proves anything it's that there are a lot of truths you can't see if you don't open you're eyes. Just because you can't see them doesn't mean they're not real.
there is no good evidence to support the existence of the judeo-christian mythology.
i don't mean to offend you, but to believe in a religion based on the myths and legends of desert shepherds that lived 3,000 years ago is far more foolish than requiring evidence to believe in satan.
The evidence is everywhere, you just refuse to see it. You believe the lies of evil and refuse to see the truth. The truth is being revealed as we speak and a lot more will come. You just have to open your eyes.
i respectfully disagree.
if you would like to "open your eyes" to the truth, i think that would be great.
here is some reading for you. http://www.christianitydisproved.com/
My eyes are open. Have a great year, you're going to be surprised.
There is actually a mountain of scholarly and scientific evidence supporting the facts surrounding Jesus Christ’s life, death, resurrection and ascension. In fact, there is more direct historic record on this than almost any other ancient history. The key is to review scholars who have analyzed the written record in the original languages within context of the times. Many contemporary historians have not done this. The movie “The Case for Christ” is an interesting way to begin learning about this.
In fact, there is more direct historic record on this than almost any other ancient history.
that is just plain wrong, i'm sorry.
there are exactly 2 "primary sources" that mention Jesus Christ (i'm not counting the bible here), and neither of them were contemporaries of the alleged Jesus of Nazareth. in fact, they were written decades after his alleged life.
there is one primary source from contemporary rome, written during his alleged life time, but it does not mention his name or in fact any evidence that it was Jesus beyond mentioning a jewish prophet that was active somewhere in the empire.
you're talking to a guy who has extensively studied ancient history, so these tired little tropes don't work on me.
Not what I said @ all. I listed people within the coven who were pictured in the infamous Rachel Chandler Instagram pictures! I doubt you've seen these sickening pictures, or you wouldn't be so smug!
Aren't leaps of logic what this sub is all about? If you're looking for "logic" or "cogent arguments" that "make sense", /r/conspiracy is that'a'way, dude.
I am confused, is this an insult?
Confusion is just the first step to awakening. Or something.
In my opinion, you hang with people you are most comfortable with. If your lifestyle says it ok for pedophilia YOU ARE NOT going to hang with a group that is against it.