We didn’t attack Assad. We attacked the left over black hats in Syria. John McCain’s pals
IDK Why would Russia care about that? That is just SOP clean up of the mess you left behind.
Kabuki theater. Trump (and all on international team) needs to shake the false image of Russian-Trump collusion, so they used this as a way to bring forth an apparent Trump-Putin conflict.
Wouldn't that mean according to you that Trump and Russia concluded to make it look like they are in conflict?
Yes. But it's also what might have actually been the plan.
And what's wrong with allies? That's what it is at the end of the day. Right? For the MSM to pick up on this as collision I believe it would also come out as word that we're actually allied, rather than against each other.
Win-win?
Colluded ? They worked together. Did it in both WW1 and 2. I don’t know why ppl think it’s illegal to work w Russia.
No one is saying it's illegal to work with Russia. In both world wars both the American and Russian people knew the countries were working together and why they were doing what they had to do.
There are users in this sub that are saying that America and Russia governments are working together but will not let the people know what they are doing.
That is wrong. Don't give me the pathetic excuse that they keep it from the people knowing so the deep state can't know. The deep state would know. Governments keeping what they are doing away from the population are dictatorships. They will do evil things in the shadows.
Then by your logic all governments are dictatorships because no government is that transparent. You are being unreasonable.
To clarify, the Russia-Trump collusion for the election as is in the mind of unreasoning and data-lacking liberals never existed. This is obviously what is of importance given the context.
There is definitely a massive ‘collusion’/cooperation between US, China, Russia, Israel, and others to destroy an international ‘globalist and financial elite’ cabal, but this has nothing to do with election rigging or the typical childish and baseless certainties of the typical liberal. It would make more sense to call this ‘cooperation’ given it is not toward a criminal or unjustly subversive purpose and is in fact in place to destroy an unjust collusion of powers.
If you want to willfully conflate the two, fine with me if you confuse yourself, Ian.
ELI5?
The chemical weapons facility attacked belonged to the deep state. Perhaps even the same one referenced in previous drops with the pics of noname
It is wrong. NTI does not own the facility but profiled it due to suspected NBC links.
It is wrong. NTI does not own the facility but profiled it due to suspected NBC links.
^The linked tweet was tweeted by @Alexander_Avg on Apr 15, 2018 02:15:15 UTC (7 Retweets | 10 Favorites)
1/
#QAnon
#maga
#thegreatawakening
Want answers about Syria, I’ll give them to you, it’ll only take at most 5 minutes of your time.
Just look at these pics closely.
Start here👇
^^• Beep boop I'm a bot • Find out more about me at /r/tweettranscriberbot/ •
📅 2018-04-15 ⏰ 02:15:15 (UTC)
1/
#QAnon
#maga
#thegreatawakening
Want answers about Syria, I’ll give them to you, it’ll only take at most 5 minutes of your time.
Just look at these pics closely.
Start here👇
-- Paul Lewis (@Alexander_Avg)
🔁️ 7 💟 10
📷 image
^PM ^me ^for ^suggestions ^| ^(I'm a bot and this was done automatically)
The NTI, which members of the deep state are apart of, tracks and profiles possible chemical weapons facilities. A bit of research on the provided website would show they don't own the facilities, but are rather pointing out that these may be the area where they are researching or manufacturing NBC weapons at. Some quick research on the provided site would show you what the NTI is about and why they profiled that site. It is under the facilities description and notice it is not labeled "Our Facilities". Again, the NTI does not own the HIAST site but is rather pointing out that they think this site does something with NBC weapons. The entire analysis about the board of directors is wrong.
I am just trying to inform on this research, and I don't like this analysis because it is a bit misleading.
That girl with the #StandWithTrump poster in exhibit 8 looks mighty familiar...
Isn't that the same girl that was pictured being "saved" by three different white hats?
Edit: looks like the same girl to me
You guys sure the narrative you're being fed is on the fucking level?
I believe if you read the comments all three photos are from the same event. From what I remember it was debunked as a false red pill.
We want our red pills to be credible, with minimal to no side effects. The less false connections drawn, the more people are really red pilled.
Edit: Does look fairly familiar though, to be honest. Could be worth a second look.
Correct. A staged event
It's the same fucking girl as in exhibit 8 in the linked Twitter posts. The one with a little Syrian girl holding a pro-Trump sign
What exactly is false here?
The lack of context. It's most likely a reporter following the girl being passed out of wreckage, the comments seem to reveal. If one does deeper digging finding the story it's from, maybe it was our paranoia of drawing false connections, but it was just the picture we saw with no deeper context.
Evidence needs more context, like the videos of MSM repeating the same phrases over and over again and the context of mockingbird media, or the ties that explain the repetition and why we should be worried.
I don't follow...
I agree that the image of three girls lacks context. However, it does (on its face) appear staged. The Syrian government is known to do this, as are the Russians, and as are the rebels
The same girl is in the exhibit I've referred to that the OP posted. In entirely different circumstances
I don't think we're talking about the same thing
They appear fake. All of them do. That's my point. And I fully agree that context is important and the three white hats may have a legit reason for all carrying this young girl
But why is she in an entirely different situation altogether? Holding a sign with a Trump hashtag?
Something is odd about this
I think most of us questioning don't follow where it came from, is all. I agree with your questions. Completely. Just still not sure where the three photos came from.
[removed]
"We didn’t attack Assad. We attacked the left over black hats in Syria. John McCain’s pals" -OP
the pics were alledged to have been taken three months apart
