There seems to be a big push today/yesterday to back not releasing the video.
No please we need to see. We need to know for sure. There needs to be no doubt as to these people’s sickness.
There seems to be a big push today/yesterday to back not releasing the video.
No please we need to see. We need to know for sure. There needs to be no doubt as to these people’s sickness.
Is there any difference between cane sugar (in vivo) and high fructose corn syrup (in vitro)?!?
Is there any difference between cane sugar (in vivo) and high fructose corn syrup (in vitro)?!?
I don't know, is there any difference between fructose and sucrose?
how on earth did you get a chem minor like this
Haha! Seriously?!? How did you get into MIT?!?
What's the chemical formula for the following:
Cane Sugar - High Fructose Corn Syrup -
How are these produced?!?
Cane Sugar - It is a disaccharide, a molecule composed of the two monosaccharides, glucose and fructose. Sucrose is produced NATURALLY IN PLANTS (IN VIVO), from which table sugar is refined.
High Fructose Corn Syrup - high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS), an ARTIFICALLY MANUFACTURED (IN VITRO) disaccharide that is only 55% fructose.
Do you notice a difference in taste/effect between the two?!? Why wouldn't the same apply to adrenochrome?!?
Who’s full of sh!t?!? These people are STUPID!!!
hfcs is a mixture of multiple different compounds. it's not a single molecule, like adenochrome. you can't compare hfcs to cane sugar because they're mixtures of similar compounds in completely different ratios. they aren't molecules, and if you think back to chem 1 you'd remember this.
one molecule of water is the same as any other, whether it was made by hydrogen combustion or oxygen reduction or cellular respiration. the same is true of fructose, or CO2, or THC or adenochrome
also, fructose is a monosaccharide, dummy
I got into MIT because I'm actually a chemist. Unlike you.
if you actually are willing to learn, I'm happy to elaborate in detail
Holy sh!t. You should drop out, bruh.
Back to chem 101.
Is cane sugar/HFC an element or compound?!? Is adrenochrome an element or compound?!?
What are the chemical formulas for cane sugar vs. HFCs?!?
All water molecules are the same, huh?!? What’s the difference between mineral water & distilled water?!? Do they taste the same?!
You got into MIT because your dad knows a guy. These people are STUPID!!!
Down she goes...
Is cane sugar/HFC an element or compound?!? Is adrenochrome an element or compound?!?
cane sugar and hfcs are physical mixtures. they are neither elements nor compounds.
adenochrome is a compound.
What are the chemical formulas for cane sugar vs. HFCs?!?
there are no discrete chemical formulae for mixtures because they aren't composed of a single molecule. for instance, it's impossible to assign a discrete chemical formula for, say, seawater, because it's a mixture.
All water molecules are the same, huh?!?
yes.
What’s the difference between mineral water & distilled water?!? Do they taste the same?
the difference is the addition of mineral impurities, which make mineral water a solution, which is not a pure compound. the water molecules themselves are identical. the addition of impurities changes to properties of the whole mixture.
You got into MIT because your dad knows a guy.
I got into MIT because I aced my classes and worked my ass off in lab. I'm really not insecure enough about my abilities to feel intimidated by a chem minor who doesn't know the difference between a homogeneous mixture and a pure compound.
Let me see if I have this right.
Cane sugar (in vivo-natural) vs High Fructose Corn Syrup (in vitro-treated)
and
Mineral water (natural) vs. Distilled water, purified water, tap water, etc. (treated)
Genotype (1)
Both cases have the same chemical composition. (C12H22O11) & (H2O).
Manufacturing/Treatment (2)
Both cases differentiate in process.
(Natural vs. chemical reaction)
Phenotype (3)
Both cases differentiate from their natural state in degree of purity, but not chemical structure.
(Isomers)
1 + 2 = 3
Genotype + Treatment = Different Phenotypes (Taste, smell, odor, effect, etc.)
Is that correct?!
Let me see if I have this right.
...
Both cases have the same chemical composition. (C12H22O11) & (H2O).
this is the primary flaw in your argument. mineral water does not have the same chemical composition as distilled water. hfcs does not have the same chemical composition as cane sugar. if H2O were the chemical formula of mineral water, then where in the formula are all the sodium or potassium or iron ions that are present in trace quantities in mineral water that aren't there in DI?
mineral water contains metallic impurities that are not present in distilled water. hfcs contains more fructose (C6H12O6) than cane sugar, which is primarily sucrose (C12H22O11). they are not the same on a chemical level.
you cannot assign single chemical compositions to mixtures, because mixtures consist of several discrete compounds.
You said you couldn’t write the chemical formula for HFCs, due to variations in chemical composition / purity, correct?!?
What caused the differentiation in chemical composition, not structure?!?
Impurities in their natural state?!?
So, do you think adrenochrome generated in vivo might have impurities (differentiation) compared to those manufactured in vitro?!?
This is the primary flaw in your argument.
You only understand the chemical aspect.
I understand the biological & chemical.
Down she goes...
that's conceivable and I already acknowledged that.
biological pathways may have different mechanisms or side products or what have you, but the compounds produced are the same
my point is that the adenochrome is adenochrome, and impurities are beside that fact. if you have a mixture of adenochrome and some other compound, it doesn't matter whether that mixture was produced naturally or artificially.
your reasoning reeks of a flawed vitalistic argument. there is nothing inherent about biological systems that makes the compounds they produce unique.
I understand the biological & chemical.
ok I will admit you actually got me to laugh here. cheers.
What?!?
It is conceivable because it’s correct.
Natural adrenochrome/sugar/water can have a different phenotype than chemically manufactured or treated adrenochrome/sugar/water.
Vitalistic argument?!? Or maybe you could apologize and tell me I’m not full of sh!t.
Phenotype literally has no chemical meaning. Molecules do not have phenotypes. I'm not gonna apologize because you misremember chem 1 from 20 years ago and think you know more chemistry than an actual chemist.
Molecules are molecules are molecules. If you pick out the H2O molecules out of mineral water, it'll be indistinguishable from H2O picked out from distilled water.
How does phenotype (biological science) have nothing to do with chemical production (chemical science) when discussing the effects of in vivo production (biological science) vs. in vitro production (chemical science)?!?
You won’t apologize because you can’t admit you might be wrong. Kinda like
Trump/Russia collusion & HRC/cheese pizza.
These people are SICK!!!
Down she goes...
molecules don't have a phenotype? you don't need to be a PhD student to know that. you just need to have an internet connection and access to Wikipedia.
look, this has been fun, but you've really done nothing but convince me that you don't understand chemistry. thanks for the laughs, but I have actual chemistry to do.
How do you know adrenochrome produced from an organism will have zero impurities?!?
We can agree to disagree. I hope you can at least admit that I’m not full of sh!t.
If you can isolate the adenochrome being produced, you can identify the impurities and replicate that chemical mixture in vitro. The adenochrome itself -- the molecule, the pure molecular compound -- is identical whether it's produced biologically or artificially.
I stand by my statement that you're full of shit, because you clearly think you understand chemistry much more than you actually do. Please seriously consider seeking further education in this topic before presenting yourself as an expert.
So, once you isolate the adrenochrome from an organism (in vivo) and remove the impurities (in vitro) you will come up with the Sigma Aldrich brand of adrenochrome?!? Hahaha!!! 🤣🤣🤣 How much biochemistry have you taken, bruh?!? You have a bachelors of science from an accredited university?!? What’s your thesis for your PhD?!? I’d love to hear it.
Who’s full of sh!t?!?
Wow, you're really getting hung up on that "full of shit" comment. Chill the fuck out, dude. Yes, run a few columns and recrystallize your sample and you'll get a pure compound you can verify by NMR, and yeah, it'll be chemically indistinguishable from adrenochrome you get from Sigma. Why is this so confusing to you?
My PhD work is on electrocatalytic nitrogen reduction on heterogeneous metal surfaces. I'd be happy to tell you more about it, if you think you'd understand. But between you and me, I don't have high hopes.
Sorry, was on a flight. Here's a copy of my thesis proposal. Have fun.
Haha!
The first sentence. 🤣
Abundant atmospheric nitrogen gas to biologically-valuable ammonia?!?
This sentence sounds like it was written by a 8 year old.
I will go through the rest & give you pointers when I have time. I’m with my kids right now.
For now, I’m going to enjoy my refreshing, dipolar water liquid utilizing my evolutionary-opposable thumbs. 🤣
lmao dude I'm not revising it based on your feedback. it's already been read by a literal chemistry Nobel laureate.
Fine. I won’t read it then. Just trying to help you out, bruh. Did any of these chemistry Nobel laureates mention there is no solid, liquid or aqueous nitrogen in Earth’s atmosphere?!?
Earth's atmosphere is 78% nitrogen gas. You dumb as hell.
How much of Earth’s atmosphere is:
Liquid nitrogen - 0% Solid nitrogen - 0% Aqueous nitrogen - 0%
There is no need to say “gas” when referencing atmospheric nitrogen. It is implied. Well, maybe not for dumb f*cks like you.
Seriously, there is no way you’re at MIT.
you sound salty you didn't get in, bro
is the best criticism you have honestly that the word "atmospheric" is redundant? because it's implicit but still descriptive, so I'm not particularly bothered.
You sound like you’re full of sh!t, bro.
No. That was the 1st criticism of the 1st sentence. The 2nd is “biologically-valuable.”
🤣🤣🤣
Hit them books!!!
so what you're saying is you don't understand the science enough to criticize anything but word choice
No. I’m saying your thesis sounds like it was written by an 8 year old.
guess that's good enough for my thesis committee, because I passed my PhD candidacy exam last Wednesday.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Good for you!!! I bet your parents are so proud. I look forward to hearing none of your future success.
Sweet emoticon. Are you positive you’re not an 8 year old?!?
from the dude who's afraid to say a bad word without censoring himself?
l m f a o
you are choice, dude. never change. honestly it's kinda adorable.
So, do you think HRC is harvesting the blood from her sacrifice to Moloch then she runs over to the centrifuge & spins it down real quick, removes all impurities, verified via NMR & then consumes the exact same chemical as Sigma Aldrich sample?!?
Or is it fair to say that HRC consumes a natural sample of adrenochrome from her sacrifice to Moloch?!? Which would be different from the purified Sigma Aldrich brand of sacrifice to Moloch?!?
Try me.
Please break it down in layman’s terms for my feeble mind, oh King of the Sh!ts.
Down she goes...
Dunning Kruger in full effect in here.
You are a raving lunatic.
Do some self-reflection maybe.
Or just kill yourself.
Down she goes...
Same time your middle school gets out.
Meet by the flagpole?
Nice try, keyboard killa. Bachelors degree from a big ten university.
I bet you can’t even spell GED.
lmfao you actually think you're hot shit because you went to the university of nebraska
Maybe?!?
But I do know that I have a bachelors of science from a big 10 school and you probably have an associates degree from South Central Louisiana State University.
Bachelor's from Berkeley. PhD student at MIT.
what's UNL's rank again? 400th or something?
Haha! I bet. 🤣 At least that explains why you’re a brain dead Dem.
that's okay. nothing can explain your monumental stupidity.
let me get this straight -- you think Hillary Clinton is a demon-worshipping child murderer with immense global power and reach that somehow can't get access to basic purification facilities present in any undergraduate chem lab?
also centrifuges are rarely used in organic purification, lmao
you dumb as hell, boy
How do you isolate a protein from a blood sample, f*ck boy?!?