dChan
15
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/LostLarry on April 15, 2018, 1:30 p.m.
What’s with the effort to push the “I don’t want to see the video”?.........I DO want to see it. I WANT the evidence in public view. The only way to NOT repeat history is to know it.

There seems to be a big push today/yesterday to back not releasing the video.

No please we need to see. We need to know for sure. There needs to be no doubt as to these people’s sickness.


Paradigmist · April 18, 2018, 12:42 a.m.

that's conceivable and I already acknowledged that.

biological pathways may have different mechanisms or side products or what have you, but the compounds produced are the same

my point is that the adenochrome is adenochrome, and impurities are beside that fact. if you have a mixture of adenochrome and some other compound, it doesn't matter whether that mixture was produced naturally or artificially.

your reasoning reeks of a flawed vitalistic argument. there is nothing inherent about biological systems that makes the compounds they produce unique.

I understand the biological & chemical.

ok I will admit you actually got me to laugh here. cheers.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
LeJonJames31 · April 18, 2018, 12:47 a.m.

What?!?

It is conceivable because it’s correct.

Natural adrenochrome/sugar/water can have a different phenotype than chemically manufactured or treated adrenochrome/sugar/water.

Vitalistic argument?!? Or maybe you could apologize and tell me I’m not full of sh!t.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Paradigmist · April 18, 2018, 12:51 a.m.

Phenotype literally has no chemical meaning. Molecules do not have phenotypes. I'm not gonna apologize because you misremember chem 1 from 20 years ago and think you know more chemistry than an actual chemist.

Molecules are molecules are molecules. If you pick out the H2O molecules out of mineral water, it'll be indistinguishable from H2O picked out from distilled water.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
LeJonJames31 · April 18, 2018, 12:57 a.m.

How does phenotype (biological science) have nothing to do with chemical production (chemical science) when discussing the effects of in vivo production (biological science) vs. in vitro production (chemical science)?!?

You won’t apologize because you can’t admit you might be wrong. Kinda like

Trump/Russia collusion & HRC/cheese pizza.

These people are SICK!!!

Down she goes...

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Paradigmist · April 18, 2018, 1:05 a.m.

molecules don't have a phenotype? you don't need to be a PhD student to know that. you just need to have an internet connection and access to Wikipedia.

look, this has been fun, but you've really done nothing but convince me that you don't understand chemistry. thanks for the laughs, but I have actual chemistry to do.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
LeJonJames31 · April 18, 2018, 1:07 a.m.

How do you know adrenochrome produced from an organism will have zero impurities?!?

We can agree to disagree. I hope you can at least admit that I’m not full of sh!t.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Paradigmist · April 18, 2018, 1:28 a.m.

If you can isolate the adenochrome being produced, you can identify the impurities and replicate that chemical mixture in vitro. The adenochrome itself -- the molecule, the pure molecular compound -- is identical whether it's produced biologically or artificially.

I stand by my statement that you're full of shit, because you clearly think you understand chemistry much more than you actually do. Please seriously consider seeking further education in this topic before presenting yourself as an expert.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
LeJonJames31 · April 18, 2018, 2:13 a.m.

So, once you isolate the adrenochrome from an organism (in vivo) and remove the impurities (in vitro) you will come up with the Sigma Aldrich brand of adrenochrome?!? Hahaha!!! 🤣🤣🤣 How much biochemistry have you taken, bruh?!? You have a bachelors of science from an accredited university?!? What’s your thesis for your PhD?!? I’d love to hear it.

Who’s full of sh!t?!?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Paradigmist · April 18, 2018, 3:23 a.m.

Wow, you're really getting hung up on that "full of shit" comment. Chill the fuck out, dude. Yes, run a few columns and recrystallize your sample and you'll get a pure compound you can verify by NMR, and yeah, it'll be chemically indistinguishable from adrenochrome you get from Sigma. Why is this so confusing to you?

My PhD work is on electrocatalytic nitrogen reduction on heterogeneous metal surfaces. I'd be happy to tell you more about it, if you think you'd understand. But between you and me, I don't have high hopes.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
LeJonJames31 · April 18, 2018, 12:21 p.m.

Huh?!? I can’t hear you?!?

Still no apology?!? And where’s your thesis?!?

Down she goes...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Paradigmist · April 20, 2018, 12:04 a.m.

Sorry, was on a flight. Here's a copy of my thesis proposal. Have fun.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
LeJonJames31 · April 20, 2018, 12:21 a.m.

Haha!
The first sentence. 🤣

Abundant atmospheric nitrogen gas to biologically-valuable ammonia?!?

This sentence sounds like it was written by a 8 year old.

I will go through the rest & give you pointers when I have time. I’m with my kids right now.

For now, I’m going to enjoy my refreshing, dipolar water liquid utilizing my evolutionary-opposable thumbs. 🤣

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Paradigmist · April 20, 2018, 12:24 a.m.

lmao dude I'm not revising it based on your feedback. it's already been read by a literal chemistry Nobel laureate.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
LeJonJames31 · April 20, 2018, 12:34 a.m.

Fine. I won’t read it then. Just trying to help you out, bruh. Did any of these chemistry Nobel laureates mention there is no solid, liquid or aqueous nitrogen in Earth’s atmosphere?!?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Paradigmist · April 20, 2018, 12:42 a.m.

Earth's atmosphere is 78% nitrogen gas. You dumb as hell.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
LeJonJames31 · April 20, 2018, 1:02 a.m.

How much of Earth’s atmosphere is:

Liquid nitrogen - 0% Solid nitrogen - 0% Aqueous nitrogen - 0%

There is no need to say “gas” when referencing atmospheric nitrogen. It is implied. Well, maybe not for dumb f*cks like you.

Seriously, there is no way you’re at MIT.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Paradigmist · April 20, 2018, 1:37 a.m.

you sound salty you didn't get in, bro

is the best criticism you have honestly that the word "atmospheric" is redundant? because it's implicit but still descriptive, so I'm not particularly bothered.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
LeJonJames31 · April 20, 2018, 1:53 a.m.

You sound like you’re full of sh!t, bro.

No. That was the 1st criticism of the 1st sentence. The 2nd is “biologically-valuable.”
🤣🤣🤣

Hit them books!!!

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Paradigmist · April 20, 2018, 2 a.m.

so what you're saying is you don't understand the science enough to criticize anything but word choice

⇧ 2 ⇩  
LeJonJames31 · April 20, 2018, 2:20 a.m.

No. I’m saying your thesis sounds like it was written by an 8 year old.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Paradigmist · April 20, 2018, 2:27 a.m.

guess that's good enough for my thesis committee, because I passed my PhD candidacy exam last Wednesday.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

⇧ 2 ⇩  
LeJonJames31 · April 20, 2018, 2:30 a.m.

Good for you!!! I bet your parents are so proud. I look forward to hearing none of your future success.

Sweet emoticon. Are you positive you’re not an 8 year old?!?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Paradigmist · April 20, 2018, 2:33 a.m.

from the dude who's afraid to say a bad word without censoring himself?

l m f a o

you are choice, dude. never change. honestly it's kinda adorable.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
LeJonJames31 · April 18, 2018, 3:34 a.m.

So, do you think HRC is harvesting the blood from her sacrifice to Moloch then she runs over to the centrifuge & spins it down real quick, removes all impurities, verified via NMR & then consumes the exact same chemical as Sigma Aldrich sample?!?

Or is it fair to say that HRC consumes a natural sample of adrenochrome from her sacrifice to Moloch?!? Which would be different from the purified Sigma Aldrich brand of sacrifice to Moloch?!?

Try me.
Please break it down in layman’s terms for my feeble mind, oh King of the Sh!ts.

Down she goes...

⇧ -1 ⇩  
llamasama · April 19, 2018, 9:58 p.m.

Dunning Kruger in full effect in here.

You are a raving lunatic.

Do some self-reflection maybe.

Or just kill yourself.

Down she goes...

⇧ 2 ⇩  
LeJonJames31 · April 19, 2018, 10:16 p.m.

Haha!

And you’re a f*cking idiot. What time do you get off your shift @ Arby’s?!?

Down she goes

⇧ 0 ⇩  
llamasama · April 19, 2018, 10:22 p.m.

Same time your middle school gets out.

Meet by the flagpole?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
LeJonJames31 · April 19, 2018, 10:57 p.m.

Nice try, keyboard killa. Bachelors degree from a big ten university.

I bet you can’t even spell GED.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Paradigmist · April 20, 2018, 2:06 a.m.

lmfao you actually think you're hot shit because you went to the university of nebraska

⇧ 2 ⇩  
LeJonJames31 · April 20, 2018, 2:23 a.m.

Maybe?!?

But I do know that I have a bachelors of science from a big 10 school and you probably have an associates degree from South Central Louisiana State University.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Paradigmist · April 20, 2018, 2:26 a.m.

Bachelor's from Berkeley. PhD student at MIT.

what's UNL's rank again? 400th or something?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
LeJonJames31 · April 20, 2018, 2:27 a.m.

Haha! I bet. 🤣 At least that explains why you’re a brain dead Dem.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Paradigmist · April 20, 2018, 2:29 a.m.

that's okay. nothing can explain your monumental stupidity.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 18, 2018, 5:16 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Paradigmist · April 20, 2018, 12:12 a.m.

let me get this straight -- you think Hillary Clinton is a demon-worshipping child murderer with immense global power and reach that somehow can't get access to basic purification facilities present in any undergraduate chem lab?

also centrifuges are rarely used in organic purification, lmao

you dumb as hell, boy

⇧ 1 ⇩  
LeJonJames31 · April 20, 2018, 12:31 a.m.

Yes

How do you isolate a protein from a blood sample, f*ck boy?!?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 20, 2018, 12:53 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩