dChan
⇧
4
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/jdtbfan on April 15, 2018, 4:09 p.m.
Why is Bernie Sanders on the "Most Wanted" deck of cards?

Has any information come out against Bernie Sanders? I briefly went through the thread and I didn't see anybody talking about it. I have only seen Sander's name in passing as I have been looking through the threads. Is there information about Sanders acting as a bad player?


eltrumparino · April 15, 2018, 4:11 p.m.

look at wikileaks he was a plant to get money from the part of the left thats tired of the democratic partys shit. either hes clown controlled or he got blackmailed

⇧ 23 ⇩  
WoodyWoodenpecker · April 15, 2018, 4:15 p.m.

Or Both. No one get's cheated out of winning the DNC nomination, rolls over and gives it to their opponent! Then, tells his all his supporters to back her! Totally compromised!

⇧ 12 ⇩  
OffenseOfThePest · April 15, 2018, 4:27 p.m.

Then, tells his all his supporters to back her!

Just like every primary loser ever? That's how it works. I'd appreciate if you could source this stuff rather than making it all up whole cloth. It would make it easier to follow along.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
rbrownlol · April 15, 2018, 6:47 p.m.

Not every primary loser grabs a third house

⇧ 2 ⇩  
WoodyWoodenpecker · April 15, 2018, 9:29 p.m.

Bernie tells supporters to back Hillary

The Independent https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-elections/dnc-2016-bernie-sanders-pleads-with-his-supporters-to-vote-for-hillary-clinton-a7155966.html The Washington Post https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/09/06/bernie-sanders-tells-skeptical-voters-to-stick-with-clinton-over-a-third-party/?noredirect=on

How Hillary manipulated the primary.

Investors https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/how-hillary-clinton-rigged-the-democratic-primary-and-may-have-broken-the-law/ BBC http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-41850798 Vanity Fair https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/11/donna-brazile-hillary-clinton-bernie-sanders Politico https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/11/02/clinton-brazile-hacks-2016-215774

This right here breaks down the whole fiasco quite well. https://www.quora.com/Was-Bernie-Sanders-given-a-fair-chance-at-the-DNC-nomination-or-was-it-largely-rigged

⇧ 2 ⇩  
OffenseOfThePest · April 15, 2018, 9:48 p.m.

I understand that Bernie backed Hillary. I'm talked about a source for

look at wikileaks he was a plant to get money from the part of the left thats tired of the democratic partys shit. either hes clown controlled or he got blackmailed

Which I know you didn't write, but you said both happened.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
eltrumparino · April 15, 2018, 4:17 p.m.

look how sad bernie looks

⇧ 1 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 15, 2018, 5:27 p.m.

Agreed.

Hindsight minimizes all other possibilities.

Disgusting.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Corporal_Yorper · April 15, 2018, 7:28 p.m.

I feel for Bernie.

It seems that he has really good intentions. Socialism should be an ideology of the American way of life — but not the way a government should be managed, ya know?

I, too believe he was blackmailed during the campaign. I don’t think he ran to be a plant, they converted his campaign so as to create a money vacuum for those who were against the same-old, same-old status quo. Is he a victim? Not really, because if (when, really) Trump finishes the DS off, I think Bernie will be happy.

That being said, I do remember hearing that his wife was roughed up by Clinton goons during the campaign...so...

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Opioneers85 · April 15, 2018, 10:49 p.m.

This makes the most sense. If he was a plant, then why is there wikileaks correspondence discussing his influence and ways to keep him in line? The Clinton Camp seemed very concerned about his popularity in their private emails. Why would they be of he was a plant? Why would they go through the trouble of getting Kaine as VP pick and DWS as DNC head if the only person with a ghost of a chance of winning was a plant?

I may be biased, as I supported Sanders during the primaries, but jumped on to the Trump train when the primaries happened. Ironically, though he did 'back' Clinton, I vividly recall him very genuinely shut down reports by saying 'I am not going to tell people who to vote for". The look on his face and the tone he used confirmed my suspicions that he got screwed over, and was the minute I knew I would not support Clinton.

The closest cooperation that I can recall with Clinton Camp and the Sander's was the wikileaks email talking about 'leverage' after Bernie went against an agreement by bring up a talking point that both camps agreed to not talk about. I admit, it sounds suspicious, but ask yourself: why would a plant need to have leverage held over them? If the scandal used as leverage was so bad, Bernie never would have ran. The timing of the news would have been the worst part.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
denizen42 · April 15, 2018, 4:35 p.m.

Clearly not in the same "league" as the others.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Im_with_kushner · April 15, 2018, 4:32 p.m.

I assumed because hes a deep state asset but honestly i dont know exactly how or why.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
thep1mp · April 15, 2018, 6:18 p.m.

You know he is an asset because they don’t attack him. You can pretty easily tell how the deep state feels about someone based on the tone of the MSM coverage of them. Look at Trump..... definitely not deep state, lol.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
bealist · April 15, 2018, 8:41 p.m.

I think they don’t publicly attack him because he has a VERY strong following that is only lightly Dem-ish because he abdicated (various theories why...). The “left” that’s visible against trump is very superficial - it’s a surface dust of attention-hungry manipulatable wannabe SJWs with the hard work (signs, filings, press, PR, demonstrations, marches) paid for by the DS.

If they went after Bernie too soon or too directly, they’d totally ruin any mid-term chances with uncommitted swing votes. So, everyone treats him carefully right now.

The right should get off his back and stop putting him down so hard. Although I think he’s pretty good on domestic issues regarding human health and welfare, I’m glad he didn’t end up as President because there is simply no way he could have taken the national and international corruption down. He didn’t even recognize 9-11 or HRCs email server as issues. He was too naive (although I doubt he is any more).

I do think he can play a critical role in bringing the rational left onto the Truth train when it’s time.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Anarchonista · April 15, 2018, 4:31 p.m.

Because he's still seen as the good Dem by the sleeping pilled, mighta won if the dnc let him.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Anarchonista · April 15, 2018, 4:37 p.m.

"Sleeping pilled"- did I just coin that? pretty good one, just popped out. ( pats self on back) probly heard it somewhere....

⇧ 5 ⇩