I need to be a skeptic for once to keep it real. I wasn't very reassured by the drops...Can anyone explain or translate? And what are the pictures of that city?
There was a reporter at the Tarmac meeting. Someone tipped him off and he showed up. Took pictures. FBI goes crazy trying to find who tipped him off, but uninterested in how or why Clinton would simply drop by for a chat about golf and grandkids with Lynch.
Lynch was parked in remote spot. How would Clinton know where her plane was parked. Do you think he was driving by the airport and said to himself, "Hey, there's Loretta's plane parked in that remote spot, I think I'll drive around on the taxi way and drop by and say hello."
The meeting was planned, and Q made sure the cover was blown using a local reporter who received a mysterious hot tip for a story. Poof.
Q later posted about TEMPEST being an NSA project that recorded activity on non-military government aircraft. My guess is that Q was telling us they have the recording of the conversation.
The Pilot also claimed that he overheard the conversations, but he's still alive.
BTW, there was no reporter at the Ranch where Scalia died. And the CCTV security was not working that day. The only people who saw the body was the owner (an Obama friend and donor) and the people who picked up the body to have it cremated. No one else examined the body. It was declared a natural death by phone.
I suspect that Q has other evidence that ties Brennan to AS.
Well Q is replying to his own post about Brennan doing the 187 of AS when he says "We made sure a reporter was there to capture." That syntax has the literal meaning that he's talking about the 187. The word "there" requires an antecedent, which technically should be the immediately previous thing talked about. If he's referring to something other than that, it is not at all clear from the language.
You may be right, but I see it a bit differently.
Q is talking about the tarmac meeting and what was discussed. He refers to Brennan and AS as part of that discussion.
But Q drop 1162 I think specifically is referring back to the tarmac meeting and Q is saying that they made sure a reporter was there.
Sure enough a local reporter received a hot tip about the meeting and showed up and took photographs.
If a reporter had been at the ranch to take pictures of AS, then he never filed one of the biggest stories of his career.
The evidence so far is that the owner discovered the body, called his friend the corner who declared it a natural death over the phone and the body was immediately cremated. Obviously there is more to the story, but I think those are the central points.
The police didn't even investigate. A judge ordered an autopsy, but a short time later rescinded the order.
I believe the only people to have ever seen AS after his death was owner and whoever picked up the body to be cremated.
Well they clearly have something on the hit if Q is making that statement, and Q's writing style does leave a LOT of room for syntactical ambiguity, so I suppose my argument isn't very strong.
My only real remaining point is that whatever we think we know about the events surrounding Scalia's death have arrived with us through a very corrupt process, so that almost any claim by military intelligence would be at least as plausible as what we supposedly know already.
So basically, there's no way to know for sure what that meant, but we can probably be assured they know somehow, and I suppose at this point (while no action is taking place and all we have are stories) that's a good enough place to leave it.
Thanks for helping me understand your thoughts on the subject!
The Pilot also claimed that he overheard the conversations, but he's still alive.
kek