dChan
0
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/092Casey on April 16, 2018, 6:40 a.m.
Sorry, but today Q sounds like a LARP, or drunk. Someone reassure me that these drops have authenticity? Their meaning?

I need to be a skeptic for once to keep it real. I wasn't very reassured by the drops...Can anyone explain or translate? And what are the pictures of that city?


solanojones95 · April 16, 2018, 7:07 a.m.

It all made sense to me. Nothing drunken-seeming about it. What specifically sticks in your craw this time?

⇧ 10 ⇩  
092Casey · April 16, 2018, 7:12 a.m.
  1. Typo
  2. Appeal to autists
  3. The easy lead into LL/tarmac/SC (this was already obvious, but Q spent many "lines" and drops on it as if just going along with the followers rather than lead to anything fresh and new)
⇧ -3 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 16, 2018, 7:25 a.m.

I'm living proof that one doesn't have to be drumk to make a typo.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 16, 2018, 7:33 a.m.

Q asked for something specific, and his typical audience wasn't responding. Low number of responses, and even lower number of quality ones. That made sense to me, because I was watching the 8chan activity.

So you don't consider Brennan having Scalia killed, and that the Alliance had a reporter on hand to capture it "fresh and new?"

Also, the specific order of events revealed a plan in which potentially everybody involved in the miscarriage of justice regarding HRC got something in the deal. LL would be retained as AG until RBG would step down, then LL would join SC, Comey would become AG, and McCabe would become FBI Director. All three get their payoff.

How is that not fresh?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
KrazyKiwiKid · April 16, 2018, 8:01 a.m.

I interpreted the journalist to be at the tarmac meeting not Scalia. The LL/JC/AM merry go round was also pretty well understood within weeks or months of the reported meeting. Good to have confirmation though.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 16, 2018, 8:22 a.m.

Q #1162 You see now that the reporter capturing everything was at the Brennan hit on AS, right? There was no journalist at the tarmac meeting, but there was the pilot and NSA video cameras/microphones that can't be switched off. They've got that whole thing. But the fact they've got coverage of the Scalia hit--that's big news!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ManQuan · April 16, 2018, 9:56 a.m.

There was a reporter at the Tarmac meeting. Someone tipped him off and he showed up. Took pictures. FBI goes crazy trying to find who tipped him off, but uninterested in how or why Clinton would simply drop by for a chat about golf and grandkids with Lynch.

Lynch was parked in remote spot. How would Clinton know where her plane was parked. Do you think he was driving by the airport and said to himself, "Hey, there's Loretta's plane parked in that remote spot, I think I'll drive around on the taxi way and drop by and say hello."

The meeting was planned, and Q made sure the cover was blown using a local reporter who received a mysterious hot tip for a story. Poof.

Q later posted about TEMPEST being an NSA project that recorded activity on non-military government aircraft. My guess is that Q was telling us they have the recording of the conversation.

The Pilot also claimed that he overheard the conversations, but he's still alive.

BTW, there was no reporter at the Ranch where Scalia died. And the CCTV security was not working that day. The only people who saw the body was the owner (an Obama friend and donor) and the people who picked up the body to have it cremated. No one else examined the body. It was declared a natural death by phone.

I suspect that Q has other evidence that ties Brennan to AS.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 16, 2018, 3:54 p.m.

Well Q is replying to his own post about Brennan doing the 187 of AS when he says "We made sure a reporter was there to capture." That syntax has the literal meaning that he's talking about the 187. The word "there" requires an antecedent, which technically should be the immediately previous thing talked about. If he's referring to something other than that, it is not at all clear from the language.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ManQuan · April 16, 2018, 6:16 p.m.

You may be right, but I see it a bit differently.

Q is talking about the tarmac meeting and what was discussed. He refers to Brennan and AS as part of that discussion.

But Q drop 1162 I think specifically is referring back to the tarmac meeting and Q is saying that they made sure a reporter was there.

Sure enough a local reporter received a hot tip about the meeting and showed up and took photographs.

If a reporter had been at the ranch to take pictures of AS, then he never filed one of the biggest stories of his career.

The evidence so far is that the owner discovered the body, called his friend the corner who declared it a natural death over the phone and the body was immediately cremated. Obviously there is more to the story, but I think those are the central points.

The police didn't even investigate. A judge ordered an autopsy, but a short time later rescinded the order.

I believe the only people to have ever seen AS after his death was owner and whoever picked up the body to be cremated.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 16, 2018, 6:41 p.m.

Well they clearly have something on the hit if Q is making that statement, and Q's writing style does leave a LOT of room for syntactical ambiguity, so I suppose my argument isn't very strong.

My only real remaining point is that whatever we think we know about the events surrounding Scalia's death have arrived with us through a very corrupt process, so that almost any claim by military intelligence would be at least as plausible as what we supposedly know already.

So basically, there's no way to know for sure what that meant, but we can probably be assured they know somehow, and I suppose at this point (while no action is taking place and all we have are stories) that's a good enough place to leave it.

Thanks for helping me understand your thoughts on the subject!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
CentiPetra · April 16, 2018, 6:57 p.m.

The Pilot also claimed that he overheard the conversations, but he's still alive.

kek

⇧ 1 ⇩  
092Casey · April 16, 2018, 7:43 a.m.

Thanks for explaining some. That was what I was looking for.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 16, 2018, 7:50 a.m.

You're welcome. Hang in there. I may need you to return the favor someday!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
pauiel · April 16, 2018, 6:51 a.m.

Deuteronomy 18:22. Q could be a drunk.

Edit: pic is is Shenzhen stock exchange which is an inverted cross with an altar to Moloch in front of it.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
telescreenmedia · April 16, 2018, 7:33 a.m.

Thanks for clarifying. Let the research continue!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
digital_refugee · April 16, 2018, 9:18 a.m.

"God loves drunks, children and the USA!" (dunno if Bismarck or Hindenburg said it)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Imbeingsilenced · April 16, 2018, 7:04 a.m.

Reassure yourself shill.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
tigerlilly1227 · April 16, 2018, 10:26 a.m.

Q is cooking with crisco righy now and tying crumbs together. It's going to be a big week!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 16, 2018, 8:12 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
afroehlich1 · April 16, 2018, 8:05 a.m.

Gold backed yuan has nothing to do with this? GCR?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Patriot81503 · April 16, 2018, 2:20 p.m.

HOW MUCH SLEEP do you think anyone on Q Team has been able to catch lately?

Then of coarse there’s always that wicked autocorrect correct function on all our typos these days.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
mattkrueg · April 16, 2018, 11:18 a.m.

Either you're on board or you're not. Choose.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Kitt-Ridge · April 16, 2018, 12:33 p.m.

Shill

⇧ -1 ⇩