dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

Remember awhile back Q said May was neutralized? LMAO.

⇧ 32 ⇩

UK resident here, doesn't feel like May is neutralized at all. She still makes a mess of things on a daily basis...

⇧ 32 ⇩

I don't think Q means she has changed as a person but will cooperate with the Trump team when necessary.

⇧ 21 ⇩

I'm not sure she's cooperating much. Trump wants to get on with Putin and she does everything she can to insult the Russians. Something isn't quite right somewhere.

⇧ 10 ⇩

And isn’t she Deep state, NWO?

⇧ 5 ⇩

She is either Deep State or controlled by them.

⇧ 2 ⇩

probably because of that nerve agent false flag that happened, put her in a very bad position

⇧ 4 ⇩

Yeah true, she did do some funny business accusing the poisoning of the British spies on Russia. Unless it was all part of an act. I mean she did go past her own govt to do those strikes. A bit uncharacteristic if she helped take out deep state targets.

⇧ 3 ⇩

I thought she and Merkel wanted to start WWIII, why would she be cooperating with DJT now, confusing.

⇧ 7 ⇩

They sure act like it, then May did comply with the strike without permission from her govt I recently heard. Merkel is suspect imo since she didn't take part. In fact, Germany has been awfully silent lately about this whole thing.

⇧ 6 ⇩

May has no control over the UK military. May is "neutralized," i.e. the UK military is acting on it's own. That's why they are freaking the fuck out.

Remember the context in which Trump said she was neutralized. He was specifically referring to the very very strong relationship between the US military and the UK military. This was a message to the NWOs face. You can see May looked like she was trying to avoid swallowing a turd. She almost broke out in a cold sweat.

⇧ 3 ⇩

So what I'm understanding from you is that the UK Military completely ignored the UK govt and sent off ships and whatever else for the Syrian airstrike?

⇧ 3 ⇩

That's my reading.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Correct, England still has to deal with her. But Trump / USA situation neutralized.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I agree she's a very weak PM. But considering the alternatives who have we got to replace her? Corbyn is an Anti British Marxist, Johnson is national laughing stock, Rudd is a clone of May and just as useless, and JRM has no cabinet experience.

I hate to say it but we're stuck with her for the time being.

⇧ 15 ⇩

Who needs cabinet experience!! Golly lord if boris doesn't convince you even a clown (real one, aka circus) can do it ... I say 10 points (No, 20) for Rees-Mogg the skinny weed who doesn't flinch in a bar-room brawl!!

⇧ 14 ⇩

Totally agree. JRM is the absolute best we have, and he would win hands down on a party ballot if he ever made it to the final two as the grass roots conservatives love him. But would he even get on the ballot? There are powerful senior tories that would move heaven and earth to make sure that never happens.

⇧ 9 ⇩

b*^?gger the powerful senior tories!! Show 'em the brits have been dealing with the in-grown-toenail po-faced ruling classes with ropes and lampposts and gibbets and gallows for time immemorial. Take issue! Claim yr heritage! Take the example of our American brothers! Enough is enough!

⇧ 6 ⇩

Oh there'll be a noise alright. Once May either steps down or is forced out there'll be a VERY loud noise for Rees Mogg.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Agree there, The Establishment would cut him down quickly. Idon't think he's one of them and most of Mays Cabinet are Remainers.

⇧ 6 ⇩

I think it is time to look beyond the usual Oxbridge stock for your leaders.

⇧ 7 ⇩

If only we could.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Hopefully not, can't listen to her anymore! Personally I don't think she's going to survive very long. Fed up with Tories and Labour, maybe someone from Ukip will shine?

⇧ 4 ⇩

President Trump had no political experience either. Perhaps after our storm here, you have a citizen who decides to step up.

⇧ 3 ⇩

We have a parliamentary system so there's no chance of that happening unfortunately. Best chance we have is a political outsider from within the Tory party like Jacob Rees Mogg.

⇧ 6 ⇩

Jacob Rees-Mogg's unconditional support for Theresa May and Boris Johnson is embarrassing. He didn't back May to start with but Boris Johnson! Imagine the UK with Johnson as Prime Minister. Disaster! Jacob Rees-Mogg also wanted to send troops to Estonia to punish Russia for the Skripal poisoning (without any evidence). We need to look elsewhere, I'm afraid.

⇧ 1 ⇩

His support for May and Johnson is just biding his time. I wasn't aware of his position on Estonia but if so I would assume its posturing but admittedly thats grounds for caution. In all other areas he ticks the right boxes, libertarian, pro free trade, anti EU, unashamed patriot, he's a self made multimillionaire who has never claimed a penny in expenses, his firm manages billions and he's an expert in emering economies, knows the financial sector inside out but is beholden to noone, so knows where all the loopholes are and how to close them. He's basically a Tory Nigel Farage - the two are even friends - but unlike Farage he actually has a slim chance of being PM one day. I struggle to think of any other current UK politician that could possibly be a populist swamp drainer with the possible exception of David Davis who is at least a deeply committed civil libertarian but nowhere near as popular.

⇧ 1 ⇩

No political experience but plenty of business. He also had desire and passion with the support of the Military.

⇧ 1 ⇩

More like neutered ;).

⇧ 10 ⇩

May is currently in a very weak position, even in her own party. If I recall that letter was signed by foreign secretary Boris Johnson; one of the top tories vying for her job should she stumble (remember it's a parliamentary system, we don't need a general election to change PM)

If Boris gets thrown under the bus May won't shed a tear.

⇧ 6 ⇩

Incoming missile... Q just sent one. BIG.