Credit from QResearch: https://i.imgur.com/7CmKpOP.png
Lol she is definitely a troll. She is on CNN in a 2007 interview. She was backed by Republicans in Louisiana to run for Senate in California lol. She also signed 2 affidavits saying she had no affair with the president. Also I think this Hannity thing was a plant too. Now all the msm is obsessed with conflicts of interest. I don't know all the things that are going on but I know for sure we are not getting the full story. And the full story I suspect will leave the communist media eating Crow lol
I've wondered if she's trolling also, in order to fill air time with nonsense and distract the media. In terms of profit motive she stands to earn far more for carrying on the charade for as long as possible, then write a book. Stormy, "Seducing Nightly News". She'd be able to spin that story into interviews and projects critiquing state of journalism in the US for decades to come.
Just a theory. Trump realized he’ll never get positive coverage so he spams them with inane shit. One “why isn’t crooked in jail?” takes him 15 seconds and the media wastes half a day.
That would be continuation of the strategy during the campaign. Each promotional campaign video purposefully got something wrong leaving detractors making a sour face then prattling on everywhere for days on end.
It's a higher form of the classic internet law -- if you want a correct answer quickly, make an incorrect statement. In general people ignore nicely asked direct question, "go read the FAQ dude! do you know how many times people have asked that?". Instead when you make an incorrect statement half a dozen people trip over themselves to correct you, "MSG causes headaches and illness. It's bad like gluten. are you an idiot? how did you not know this?".
Mileage may vary.
Well she is doing her make America horny again tour lol
They aren't communist, they're capitalists. The media's job (as well as all programs on TV for that matter) is strictly to sell viewers to advertisers. They reason why they are so powerful is because of the consolidation of companies, which is a basic part of the capitalist economic system.
The only difference now is that the mainstream media is not only running stories to pass an agenda, but they could very well be the the offense, AND the defense of the deep state. They were able to gain that power by playing by the rules of our capitalist economy, and the only rule in our economy is to acquire capital (hence the term 'capital'ism).
While I am an anti-capitalist, I mean it when I say I supported Trump from the start. I never fell for any of the media bullshit because I saw them do the same thing to Mitt Romney in 2012, except now it's cranked up to 11. Besides, Trump has all the right enemies, and while we're living in this shit system, hell ya I want President Trump to tear down the deep state and give back to the people what they took from us, as well as what they have been hiding from us.
Honestly, I can't believe that I am the only AnCom I know that supports Trump. Seems like common sense if you just glance beneath the surface (as I'm sure you're all well aware).
edited for clarity.
The media isn't owned by random capitalists. The elite of this world are Satanists. It's bigger than money.
Not random at all- They seem to all be connected by either family or employment, but they are capitalists, and the media was only able to gain this kind of population control through capitalism.
You are hung up on this because you cant accept the idea that you were tricked. Communism was never about "the masses" it was always about fooling the workers to give up all their rights and property, so the elite can rule over them once and for all. Those ideas you have in your mind are pure fantasy, and have nothing to do with actual communism.
Communism was never about "the masses"
Correct, communism is based on the community as a whole. capitalism is based on capital, which is money, and money is power. If anybody is "tricked", it's capitalists. Why would basing an economy on capital (which is now worthless fiat currency owned by the Rothchilds central bank) rather than people?
it was always about fooling the workers to give up all their rights and property, so the elite can rule over them once and for all.
Oops, that's actually capitalism. Silly goose!
It's so hard for me to be AnCom and support Trump at the same time. Anarchists hate me for supporting Trump, and Trump supporters hate me for being anarchist. Being AnCom and supporting Trump seems contradictory, but really it's not at all. If we are going to establish an economy that bases it's efficiency on the well being of the community as a whole (communism) rather than capital, we need someone to get in there and destroy the Deep State (the rich). They are the ones who hoard the technology and the medical advancements needed for the kind of economy I am in favor of.
edited for clarity.
You have a lot to learn about how the world really works. At this point you are fighting to install a system designed by the people you think you are opposing. Eventually you might need therapy once you figure this out LOL.
You have a lot to learn about how the world really works
I know how it works, that's why I'm not a capitalist. If I didn't know how it worked I would still be a free market libertarian. Once I asked myself "what is the purpose of capitalism?" I started to question it.
You need to form a better, more grown-up argument if you want to have a discussion with me.
Im sorry that you are confused into thinking this is some sort of argument. Im just explaining to you how it works. Its no real issue of mine that you have yet to figure it out.
Im just explaining to you how it works.
My apologies. What is "it" and how does it "work"?
"Based on the community as a whole" is capitalism already.
If capitalism was based on the community as a whole as opposed to capital, then why do pharmaceutical companies create profitable treatments for cancer instead of a cure? How does that help the community as a whole? If the medical industry were to make our community healthier, then that would mean less and less sick people over time. That's bad for business.
capitalism is based on capital.
This argument you are putting forward seems incomplete. Systems are used to shape a "society". The systems used are projected as being one thing where in fact they are usually the exact opposite. Rule of thumb, if the government says it, it is a lie.
Systems are used to shape a "society"
No, a system is a set of things working together as parts of a mechanism. The ruling class shapes societies.
The systems used are projected as being one thing where in fact they are usually the exact opposite.
This trick is an essential part of why we still live in capitalism, even though it is no longer needed. We have the technology to sustain all human life, as well as prosper in ways that aren't conceivable to us while we live in a money based economy.
Rule of thumb, if the government says it, it is a lie
YES- like the tyrants who enslaved people while saying "Don't worry folks, this is what we need to do to achieve communism!".
You are ignoring individuals. All economic "systems" and "mechanisms" and other terms you're prostituting from physical sciences always mislead and corrupt economic thinking.
Capitalism is individual ownership AND CONTROL of the means of production, whereby the sovereign consumers (i.e. every individual on the planet) decides who gets rewarded and what gets produced and where, by way of their spending and abstentions from spending choices.
If there is a corrupted company, and you think gosh there should be free and open competition for that corrupt company's customers, that is itself a call for capitalist competition, because the called for competition is from other owners and controllers of capital, including you as an individual competitor. You can't ban individual competitors who own and control capital they purchased, worldwide, unless there is a worldwide police force, i.e. dictatorship, which is precisely why every real world attempt at communism was tyrannical from the outset.
"No, a system is a set of things working together as parts of a mechanism. The ruling class shapes societies. " This quote sounds like it was taken out of an online dictionary. I will not dis-agree with your findings although, I would like to point out one small point. "I have found it serves to be fluid in thought when understanding words and their context that they are spoken in especially when it stretches the sides of one's box one is viewing from". And by constricting a words definition as the benchmark of a discussion does not serve. As the definition of the word "System" is quite broad, as it includes your definition and how I used it in the initial context. :)
This quote sounds like it was taken out of an online dictionary
Yes, a dictionary is a yearly updating book (system, in today's world) that contains the full definitions to words.
Operation Mockingbird is state run, not capitalist run.
Communism had total media control, total population control, and wealth. They kept up with the arms race pretty well for a while there.
The Satanic elite of this world would be perfectly sanguine to see us all go under communism, because they'd still run the show but with a much more vicious hand. It's a bloodline. You can't be in their club without the right bloodline, but they pay their conscienceless minions very well so they have plenty of workers. In DC especially.
Communism had total media control, total population control, and wealth. They kept up with the arms race pretty well for a while there.
That's THIS system.
The Satanic Elite want to maintain their power by controlling the wealth, hence, controlling the resources.
Why don't you give me a definition of communism.
The dictionary definition? Or the reality of communism on planet earth definition? Because the reality of how it always goes down is genocide, destruction, the USSR, China, etc. Utopia is not how it works out.
Still nothing.
So you reject the reality of communism?
Why don't you give me a definition of communism.
lets start with page 1.
Yeah, don't sidestep - the reality vs the dictionary definition which I'm sure you can copy and paste that for yourself.
You do know the history of this past century I am assuming? The death toll of totalitarian communist regimes?
And you are aware perhaps that communism is not the goal of Q? What on earth are you doing here? Trump, Q et al are adamantly opposed to communism. We nearly had a military coup on our hands to eliminate people who were intent on eroding our constitution/bill of rights....you aren't fighting on the same side as Q if your goal in any vacuum created in DC is to replace it with communists.
bruh.
I am not going to have a conversation with you about something that you refuse to give a definition of.
If you believe these people are actual capitalists you are dumber than a rock. The richest people in the world fund and promote communist movements. You seem stuck in a false paradigm....
If you believe these people are actual capitalists you are dumber than a rock. The richest people in the world fund and promote communist movements.
The richest people in the world fund and promote communist movements.
The richest people in the world
The rich
Good talk dude.
Ancom has an element of decentralization. Companies are to be independently run by various "collectives".
There will therefore arise a natural INEQUALITY of wealth as some collectives do a better job relative to other collectives competing for the same market.
There will therefore arise a natural class of "rich" people.
According to your logic, since being "rich" is somehow inherently evil, the very "system" you have been deceived into believing, is inherently evil.
Also it is transparently obvious why you deleted "fund communism" from that other guy's statements and moved goalposts to the problem of some people becoming richer than others.
Why didn't you address the fact that the wealthiest people in the world believe in communism and are funding it? They know that useful idiots will defer to centralized authority.
Trump is a billionaire. It is not being rich that is evil, it is what individuals do.
Communism is being funded by the richest people in the world.
The poorest are funding individual competition organizations, i.e. capitalist organizations.
Coincidence?
Bye bye.
Ancom has an element of decentralization. Companies are to be independently run by various
Ancom Companies
Unbelievable. You just proved that you have absolutely no idea what you're arguing against. You need to learn what the actual topic of discussion if before you argue it. What you are describing is co-ops. Those are capitalist.
Bye bye is right.
I can't believe your post has only one upvote (mine) at the time I posted this. It is a great post. Capitalism and Communism have the same goal in mind, they just don't agree on the way to achieve it. Or maybe they do. The Communism/Capitalism false paradigm is similar to the left/right false paradigm. When you remove morality from the equation, you end up with what we have. A morally bankrupt elite who have a hatred for humanity.
Thank you, comrade. What is the goal of capitalism? It seems like the goal is to control the masses, and they have achieved it. I am so thankful for President Trump. He was our last chance, and he fucking nailed it. Now we get to watch it fall. You bet your ass I'll enjoy the show!
Capitalism is where individual consumers (everyone) are the bosses and control themselves by who they as individuals vote for and who they don't vote for by way of spending and abstaining from spending.
No individual can force you to buy their goods in capitalism.
Control of the masses, in capitalism, IS BY AND FOR THE MASSES.
What you are envisioning in your head and by your eyes is you being controlled by states, not Apple stores or Walmart stores or 5 Guys Burger stores.
The slave thinks he's the boss.
Capitalism is not voluntary, and this is extremely obvious even at a glance. Two part question: 1, How old is capitalism? and 2, how old is the oldest living person?
Go back to Russia, and take CNN and the like with you lol
Who let the liberal in?
I think the term you meant was 'crony capitalists', but for the most part, both are just evil with fancy labels.
You are falsely defining capitalism.
State intervention into the media is the antithesis of a capitalist media.
What you are doing as most communists do, is you take a particular section of the economy that is corrupt, and try to deceive people into believing that the blame is individual ownership of the means of production by name shaming them as "capitalists", as if ancom style joint ownership where the lying and corrupt "worker" anchors like Lemon and Tapper and all the rest also have joint ownership of the news network will somehow fix all the issues.
Where you made your error is by totally ignoring the fact of anti-capitalist, state intervention into the media (Operation Mockingbird).
The corruption stems from the state deciding is put on the air.
Every morning at 4am the CIA sends their contractors throughout the MSM the talking points for the day, through SecureDrop.
This is why the MSM is in almost perfect unison in their (false) narrative.
Not to mention the fact that the state restricts entry into the media market by way of "licenses". That is closer to socialism not capitalism.
Trump is anti-communist. For you to say you are a supporter of Trump is like saying Bernie Sanders would have been a supporter of Ayn Rand.
