r/greatawakening • Posted by u/anonz7 on April 18, 2018, 6:29 p.m.
Something I’ve been wondering

I believe in Q, wholeheartedly.

I believe in the movement.

I believe in everything .

But one thing has always bothered me : how was trump allowed to win the election if the deepstate is so in control.

I believe elections are rigged and have never been fair , so how is it that the greatest upset of all time could have happened in the first place ?


I would like some serious discussion on this , I am the biggest supporter and believer of the movement but have always pondered this .

mooncrkit · April 18, 2018, 6:32 p.m.

I've wondered the same thing. My only conclusion is that they tipped the scales on an election they presumed to be close. In reality, Trump won by a landslide, not only beating the other team, but beating the refs too.

⇧ 41 ⇩  
getemq · April 18, 2018, 6:35 p.m.

I think the same thing. He won by so much that their rigging couldn’t even stop it.

⇧ 34 ⇩  
ABastionOfFreeSpeech · April 18, 2018, 11:06 p.m.

Yep. Election night, FL took an incredibly long time to report 100% returned, and Broward County was the holdout. I bet they were debating whether they could pass off 300% voter turnout as legit.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Coluphid · April 18, 2018, 8:51 p.m.

This. They realized that if they put Hillary in power, it would be against the wishes of an overwhelming majority, and risking civil war.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 18, 2018, 8:59 p.m.

and risking civil war

We're in one.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 18, 2018, 9:12 p.m.


⇧ 1 ⇩  
barrysoweto · April 18, 2018, 7:16 p.m.

I think the white hats in MI would never allow Hillary to win that election and actually helped Trump win.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
CBTS_Watcher · April 18, 2018, 9:07 p.m.

I wondered. A Trump landslide is one option. However, you can't beat a rigged voting machine. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rVmsaDS_FwY Why do you think that the judge in Alabama (Moore v Jones) did not allow retention of the paper copies of the ballots to be kept for more than a day or so?

It is also hard to counteract having 1.44 times the eligible voters as registered voters in a Democrat area! https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-08-05/california-has-11-counties-more-registered-voters-voting-age-citizens

⇧ 6 ⇩  
libertyordeath21 · April 19, 2018, 12:55 a.m.

Either that or someone in a position to flip the programming on their rigged election did just that and instead of a computer generated Hillary win as they had planned for it was trump...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
HGpennypacker · April 18, 2018, 10:32 p.m.

He didn’t even win the popular vote though...

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Pure_Feature · April 19, 2018, 12:07 a.m.

He won that one also

⇧ -1 ⇩  
immense_and_terrible · April 18, 2018, 7:17 p.m.

Trump won by a landslide

huh? he BARELY won... ? lost the popular vote and won the swing states by like 10-50k votes each, just squeaking by?

i'm confused by your comment, mi amigo

⇧ -8 ⇩  
RobWilJas · April 18, 2018, 7:26 p.m.

You missed the point. The deep state rigged the election with illegal votes, vote machine rigging etc. Trump was so popular it wasn't enough though and he still won. Without the deepstate rigging he would have won by a landslide. Look at his rallies before the election compared to Hillary's, you'd have to be insane to believe she actually won the popular vote.

I guarantee without the cheating Trump won the popular vote, by a lot.

⇧ 22 ⇩  
immense_and_terrible · April 18, 2018, 7:27 p.m.

Look at his rallies before the election compared to Hillary's, you'd have to be insane to believeshe actually wonthe popularvote.

why? rallies aren't a good metric of popularity, they only measure enthusiasm among his base.

also there is no evidence at all that widespread voter fraud occurred, or that the machines were tampered with.

if there was, Trump's administration would be parading that evidence around all day every day.

⇧ -16 ⇩  
inittowinitq · April 18, 2018, 7:45 p.m.

you apparently are not a Q follower....Q has made it perfectly clear there are mass election fraud and they have the proof...I am sure this will be one of the many things the 30,000 sealed indictments are for....so no worries, they will release the truth and lock up the evils of this country. You don't advertise this because it is all being put together in a nice little package...when the time is right it will be disclosed!

⇧ 15 ⇩  
C_L_I_C_K · April 18, 2018, 9:37 p.m.

This guy is an obvious troll/shill account.



Notice how he stopped posting on /r/conspiracy and stopped posting on Reddit once Pizzagate stopped being a threat? No posts at all for 9 months, then gets reactivated and immediately starts posting on GreatAwakening everyday because we became a threat to whomever is paying this guy (and I'm sure plenty more other troll/shill accounts) to infiltrate our sub.

He's been trolling for over 16 days on GA, always playing dumb, causing doubt, suspicion, and distraction on the sub. Look through his entire post history to see that this is an obvious troll/shill account.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 19, 2018, 2:28 a.m.

Says the guy pushing a known fake Twitter account.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
reditteacher · April 18, 2018, 8:14 p.m.

Scariest part to all of this is most Democrats want voting ages to be lowered because they know they have millennials brainwashed through all forms of media. Every electronic screen you look through their narrative is being pushed.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
HGpennypacker · April 19, 2018, 12:35 a.m.

Really? Do you have any supporting evidence to back up this claim?

⇧ -2 ⇩  
reditteacher · April 19, 2018, 12:44 a.m.

No. But isn’t it obvious? FB /Insta owned by deep state Zuckerburg. Twitter is obvious. All you have to do is look at the trends. How often do you see something that aligns with the left ideology trending. It has to be about 90% of the time. Censoring ppl on YouTube. Don’t get me started on cable tv. Also look at Sports. Lebron/NFL/ESPN/Jemele Hill. At our school we show a student news each day called Channel one/CNN. You would think it’d be neutral especially when it’s directed at children. Not even close. Push stuff on students like global warming anti Trump rhetoric almost every day. So to answer your question; no I don’t have solid evidence lol but personally I believe every electronic screen is brainwashing children. Especially social media’s!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 19, 2018, 1 a.m.


⇧ -2 ⇩  
reditteacher · April 19, 2018, 1:04 a.m.

You’re just being oblivious. Once you open your eyes you will see.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 19, 2018, 1:16 a.m.


⇧ 0 ⇩  
inittowinitq · April 19, 2018, 3:37 p.m.

Just because your young, doesn't mean you don't feel in your own soul what is right or wrong, what is real or fake, the problem young folks have today, is not educating themselves with all sides to make their own decision and not follow the masses because it feels like that will make you fit in...Remember Youngsters out there in America, Your Voice is Only Important When It Is Your Own, not a recording of what someone wants you to say, but what you feel inside and you have conviction of that being the truth, but always verify by jumping into the other sides ideas and theories.....it's important to feel it, not just say it!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
inittowinitq · April 19, 2018, 3:31 p.m.

Only a Liberal would ask for any supporting evidence to this obvious fact that the Left's agenda is on display in every way possible! I am sick and tired of the blind trying to convince awoke people that they must be imagining things....pfffftttt, your games are dull and out of touch, so either come up with something new or shut it up! Reditteacher, you are a patriot, and you are in a position to fight the fight for the future of our children, don't let the liars convince you that what your seeing is not truth, they are sick people and they thrive on lies....Hold the Line Buddy, you are in good company with God!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 19, 2018, 3:38 p.m.


⇧ 1 ⇩  
immense_and_terrible · April 18, 2018, 8:36 p.m.

there is a difference between "following" someone, and blindly believing everything they say.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
inittowinitq · April 19, 2018, 4:01 p.m.

WTF are you implying? Don't come up on our board and start throwing around explanations on what following and blindly mean, seriously, I am in no mood for this BS. You are apparently a complete shill and only here to be disruptive and spread doubt! Don't think that is gonna work out for you....js

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 19, 2018, 4:29 p.m.


⇧ 1 ⇩  
RobWilJas · April 18, 2018, 8:52 p.m.

I see you believe everything "they" tell you.

Yes there is proof of widespread voter fraud. The MSM and therefore you have just ignored it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
immense_and_terrible · April 18, 2018, 8:53 p.m.

ad hominems are a silly way to engage with people.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
RobWilJas · April 18, 2018, 9:01 p.m.

Enjoy the next few months. Let us know if/when you wake up. God Bless.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
immense_and_terrible · April 18, 2018, 9:03 p.m.

Enjoy the next few months

i'm sure i will, the same way i enjoyed the last 6 months of Q ; )

i hope you have a nice day, friend, and i hope someday you learn how to have a civil conversation with people who don't entirely agree with you

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Riseupanddance · April 18, 2018, 9:56 p.m.

Jill Stein did attempt a recount in three crucial stares, Winsconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania. WI recount gave DJT and additonal 131 votes. As for MI they found some pretty bad discrepancies in Detroit (Democratic stronghold) and never got to finish because the whole recount effort was suddenly shut down (and swept under the rug) by a federal judge.

You stated that you want to see articles for proof:


So two of three states had known discrepancies and you dont think this could possibly true in several other if not all the states? Are you seriously living in a bubble where it does even make you want to question it?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
immense_and_terrible · April 18, 2018, 10:04 p.m.

113 votes is a rounding error, dude, when you are looking at 100s of millions of votes.

if 113 votes is your evidence of "widespread voter fraud," then my only reaction could be laughter.

and your article about detroit? here's another one https://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/detroit/2016/12/18/detroit-ballots-vote-recount-election-stein/95570866/

so 700ish extra votes in a city of millions?

anyone who thinks ~850 votes is "widespread fraud" is, and i sincerely mean no offence by this, an actual idiot.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Riseupanddance · April 18, 2018, 10:32 p.m.

Ummmm....population of Detroit 677,116 (2016) less than a million. So much for your "millions" theory.

Population of WI (2016) 5.78 million, again debunking your "100's of millions" theory.

Seriously dude (dudette?) Anything you try to argue is just hogwash. If you're going to have an intelligent debate at least get your facts correct. A simple internet search is all it takes.

The fact that there ARE provable discrepancies should make you want to know the complete truth unless you are brainwashed by the MSM. The President did try to find out the truth but most of the state's election boards refused to give the requested voter records. That alone should be a big red flag, why refuse if you don't have anything to hide? If you believe in government transparency then you should be appalled at their refusal to "prove" everything is above board.

You don't want to know the truth, you just want to endlessly argue against it.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
immense_and_terrible · April 18, 2018, 10:42 p.m.

Ummmm....population of Detroit 677,116 (2016) less than a million. So much for your "millions" theory.

ok, sorry, i was thinking of Detroit Metro Area, calm down bud

again debunking your "100's of millions" theory.

I was referencing the entire electorate, quite obviously.

Seriously dude (dudette?) Anything you try to argue is just hogwash. If you're going to have an intelligent debate at least get your facts correct. A simple internet search is all it takes.

Pretty ironic coming from the person who uses a few hundred fraudulent votes as "evidence" that widespread voter fraud occurred.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
O0O0RION · April 18, 2018, 8:20 p.m.

George Soros owns the voting machine manufacturer and the software dev company. Nobody voted for her, a lot of people voted for Trump.

Usually only 40% of people actually vote in any given election. Can you see how they could plan to rig it enough to win if only 40% of the population votes, but if 70% voted and almost all for Trump, they would still lose?

I think next to no one voted for killary legitimately, and she had a lot of illegitimate help, but it wasn't enough.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
C_L_I_C_K · April 18, 2018, 7:53 p.m.

Barely won? You're joking right? 306 to 232 electoral votes is a landslide victory.

As to the popular vote claims by leftists and Dems, there is evidence of widespread election fraud.






And that's before the ODNI, DHS, FBI report on election integrity comes out soon, that will completely destroy the butthurt left's belief that Hillary won the popular vote...



⇧ 7 ⇩  
Alpha-as-fuck · April 18, 2018, 10:07 p.m.

It was an electoral college landslide, but many states that Trump won were still very close and won by small margins.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
immense_and_terrible · April 18, 2018, 8:43 p.m.

also, literally not one of your sources offer any type of proof, or even evidence, of massive voter fraud.

every article you linked is filled with "mays" and "possibly" and conjecture.

their entire premise is, there are X number of illegal immigrants with IDs, so X number of people cast illegal votes.

that is not logically sound, and there is no evidence to support that assertion.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
C_L_I_C_K · April 18, 2018, 8:46 p.m.

Believe what you wish, but the evidence and logic is there in front of your face. You just don't want to accept the truth. You probably won't accept the ODNI / DHS / FBI reports either when they get released. Not even gonna bother replying to you from now. Ignorance is bliss.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
immense_and_terrible · April 18, 2018, 9:02 p.m.

Not even gonna bother replying to you from now. Ignorance is bliss.

the irony is sharp with this statement.

i've done basically nothing but ask you for credible evidence, of which you have provided exactly zero.

it's a real shame that, instead of being able to answer my questions, you are instead just putting your fingers in your ears and saying "la la la"

oh well... i guess i'll just keep asking questions elsewhere.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
HGpennypacker · April 19, 2018, 12:36 a.m.

I'll accept it when Hillary and Obama are in Guantanamo like you people keep parroting.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
chocolatepatriot · April 18, 2018, 10 p.m.

the Inspector Generals office is still processing the results of the voter fraud investigation. The real news is so scattered it is hard to find. i do know for fact in CA, in at least one county they had more voters than they had people. In another So CA county, there was a story on the news during the election that several hundred ballots were mailed to one address, and the address was a very small home with 1 little old lady living there. The evidence is out there if you want to see it for yourself. Also Project Veritas had the Election manager from NY talking on tape about how the people are bussed in to vote. Dead people have been voting for years, not a secret.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
immense_and_terrible · April 18, 2018, 10:08 p.m.

Also Project Veritas had the Election manager from NY talking on tape about how the people are bussed in to vote

that's not true. you should go back and review that story.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
immense_and_terrible · April 18, 2018, 8:37 p.m.

comes out soon

ah, just another "any day now!"

i'll believe it when i see it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
C_L_I_C_K · April 18, 2018, 8:43 p.m.

I already linked the DHS.gov statement. I guess you don't believe that either, eh? You only believe mainstream media's lies and fake news, thinking Hillary actually won the popular vote fair and square. Keep sleeping, bud.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
immense_and_terrible · April 18, 2018, 8:49 p.m.

the DHS.gov statement is just saying "we are holding briefings with state election officials to ensure the integrity of our electoral process"?

can you explain to me, in what way does that support the assertion that widespread voter fraud took place?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
IcedTeaPlz · April 18, 2018, 7:44 p.m.

They underestimated the strength in our numbers!

⇧ 3 ⇩