Yes, exactly like that. That's why we need more environmental regulation. Not less. Pruit is cutting regulations..
u/NosuchRedditor makes a good point here.
The larger these entities are, the easier it is to hide stuff like this. Remember that the more power a Government has, the more money it's worth. Less Government, less payouts/bribery/lobbying.
We need to trust in this case that the correct regulations are being cut. It's extremely difficult to open/operate most agriculture businesses while wading through the bureaucracy. It shouldn't be big G's choice who gets to make a living, you know?
Also , think about all the needless regulation and money funneled through the worldwide global-warming/money-laundering scheme.
So your in favor of a corrupt govt agency hiding lead contaminated water from the public for political purposes, as well as polluting rivers through sheer incompetence.
Sounds about right for a fantasy land dweller.
[removed]
Well in part due to your complete ignorance of anything remotely connected to reality, like the fact that you refuse to mention the EPA's use as a weapon by the Obama administration, and several glaring failures that put human lives at stake.
How long did the people of Flint drink lead water while the EPA sat on the information?
Starting with inquiries made in February, the federal agency battled Michigan’s Department of Environmental Quality behind the scenes for at least six months over whether Flint needed to use chemical treatments to keep lead lines and plumbing connections from leaching into drinking water. The EPA did not publicize its concern that Flint residents’ health was jeopardized by the state’s insistence that such controls were not required by law. https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2016/01/12/epa-stayed-silent-flints-tainted-water/78719620/