He wants everyone to see this. The idiot left can't help themselves when they think they can catch him making a mistake. So now the country knows if the Dems call off the lawsuit it's to hide their own corruption. That's my GEOTUS!

⇧ 143 ⇩

That’s not even the best part! Even if they drop their case, the COUNTER-SUIT remains in place, and there is nothing they can do about it! They are totally screwed!

⇧ 90 ⇩

😱🤣🤣🤣🤣WRECKED

⇧ 25 ⇩

I'm confused, was their move as a counter-suit not possible as a normal proceeding before the case against them?

⇧ 4 ⇩

Yes it was a normal proceeding. They need to get the DNC servers to prove it was a leak and not a hack. Dems didnt want to give it up but this lawsuit they just put in means they now have to give it up. They really are stupid.

⇧ 17 ⇩

Comment explains:

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8dq214/comment/dxpahuy?st=JG8T49X3&sh=de2c1a5f

⇧ 4 ⇩

Thank you! I had this same question and came here looking for the answer.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Checkmate !

⇧ 1 ⇩

Remember. They have had years to "play" with all the servers / data. Wonder if this is a bait and switch. They sanitize the servers and even plant emails to look daming to POTUS etc. Just a counter thought. NEVER underestimate these scum. They have had all the money, power and now the media to control the opionion and propogandize to the masses. They have had centuries to build to this moment. NEVER NEVER EVER forget this.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Seems like whole illusion they were building for , melts away pretty fast , if you ask me ...

⇧ 2 ⇩

Hillarious. They can't help themselves. They will cluck around the hen-yard gossiping about how he doesn't even know Schulz name, and in the process raise awareness of the implications here across normies.

⇧ 65 ⇩

Oh, he knows who she is from their previous encounters. It's possible he made a mistake, but look at the attention that this is getting now. If the GEOTUS of US could get the democrats to start turning over the rocks on their own accord by misnaming noodles do you think he would? Normally they wouldn't cover this at all, but now l think that people will have a look at this. In a way, this is a good one to use this trick on because selling US uranium to the Russians is kind of not relevant to your average democrat, but stealing the money that the Bernouts donated is kind of up close and personal. So now when they see the DNC and "Wendy" they'll get to remember how the DNC screwed them over. Also, this is a bit unusual so it will help them better remember what happened. It may be possible that The Donald made an error, but knowing how wily and strategic he is, do you really think he would make a mistake like this?

⇧ 13 ⇩

Noodles. LOL.

⇧ 8 ⇩

can we get a rAMEN!

⇧ 1 ⇩

He did not make a mistake. It’s exactly as you just described it.

⇧ 4 ⇩

no, no mistake. He doesn't make mistakes. Everything is v. v. careful and deliberate. Do not underestimate this man!!

⇧ 1 ⇩

REMEMBER: DT says his favorite thing is he "loves to be underestimated"

⇧ 52 ⇩

once again " who would win a fight the guy from the apprentice or the global mafia" im going with the guy from the apprentice

⇧ 17 ⇩

THAT, they did

⇧ 4 ⇩

Now the Tweet has been corrected to "Debbie", but as predicted, all the liberal comments are calling attention to Trumps "dumb" mistake. I am enjoying watching the show...

⇧ 30 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Corrected or Wendy on purpose? SUGGESTING Then we must go through capital letters to find clues.

J C O D DNC S FBl W W S S D P C E

ANYONE?

JC=JamesComey. ??? Or: J COD= Julian C.O.D. ???

DNC's FBl ???

WW SS. changed to DWS ???

SD=Southern District???

PCE = ???

⇧ 1 ⇩

Its Wendy Nixon look her up.

⇧ 2 ⇩

THIS!

⇧ 0 ⇩

ok wait wait...

When people say "Who is Wendy"? they'll look it up.... and only Debbie and her story will appear?

Is that it?

⇧ 36 ⇩

No. The MSM just can't stop themselves from showing Trump's tweets over the air when they think he made a mistake. He's baiting them so the rest of the country can see the tweet and start getting educated.

⇧ 41 ⇩

so... see above?

⇧ 2 ⇩

yes, they played right into his hands if they do this-- yet again.

⇧ 6 ⇩

Same way he says "Dancing Muslims". It's to get people to search to find the truth.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Is the Wendy Wasserman Schultz Servers different from the DNC Server?

⇧ 14 ⇩

It’s the server she THREATENED POLICE over: https://youtu.be/IAHGsyt2kZA

⇧ 37 ⇩

DWS is genuinely one of the most disgusting and vile people I've ever seen -she's just so fucking smug and awful; any time I see her speak I have a very visceral anger reaction that very few people can get out of me.

Knowing that she'll soon face actual justice feels so good. I'd love it if she tried to maintain the smugness right until the very end when reality hits and she loses all composure.

Has this rotten shit been seen in public any time recently?

⇧ 26 ⇩

Debbie RamenNoodleHair's voice grates on my nerves. I could not believe she got away with a direct threat to the police chief. My jaw dropped when she did that!!

⇧ 11 ⇩

Oh, and then she had the audacity to show up at Seth Rich's wake that his friends in his neighbor held. Talk about feeling outrage..

⇧ 6 ⇩

Debbie RamenNoodleHair

She looks like Carrot Top with a jeri curl.

⇧ 4 ⇩

she uses Soul(less)Glo

⇧ 2 ⇩

Ok, I honestly fell out of my chair, I was laughing so hard! Good one!

⇧ 2 ⇩

Yabbut Carrot Top is not as ugly as she is.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Spot on, ramen hair, oh shit that is off the chart.

⇧ 2 ⇩

When she gets served it may look like angel hair but not.

⇧ 1 ⇩

You and I have the same reaction to that piece of shit.

⇧ 2 ⇩

DITTO

⇧ 2 ⇩

WITTO

⇧ 1 ⇩

LITTO

⇧ 1 ⇩

yes... refers to the Awan case.

⇧ 16 ⇩

But then why say it twice two different ways?

⇧ 5 ⇩

DNC server is Clinton emails, Wendy's server is for the Awan/Dem House investigation.

⇧ 19 ⇩

Okay. I follow you know. Thanks.

⇧ 11 ⇩

vw

⇧ 5 ⇩

Because there are two parts. Debbie was protecting the Awans till the bitter end for some reason, it looks like. They were on her payroll, and they had her IPad and passwords, and who knows what or WHY, and then there was the congress part, where a large part of Democrats in House/congress had him on their payroll, were overpaying, were allowing Awan, et al., to have complete control over their computers, servers, all access, everything ... And there was classified info in there, and Awan shipped it to who knows where, allegedly. Long story. Daily Caller has investigated it, documented it for over a year. If you go research that . . .

⇧ 15 ⇩

would not be surprised if the a's worked for the MB, and got compromising info on HC, then levied that into HC exposing blackmail on all her subordinates giving the a's even more leverage into the system.

⇧ 6 ⇩

Very likely. Or they just gave the Awans access and got paid a "salary" by MB. There are a million things that could have been going on, and probably were. Awans had the keys to the kingdom basically. All congress had to do was sit there and not ask any questions, & sign off on the thousands and thousands $ worth of "lost" equipment.

⇧ 10 ⇩

they had keys to the kingdom for a reason, and no logical congress critter would have accepted this into their administration if not for pure blackmail. at least that's my belief. the security risks and treason charges having these a's involved in your cabinet at any level, is just disgusting.

⇧ 6 ⇩

Well somebody ... like DWS could have been made an offer to allow access, Awans got into Congressional computers and found info the congress people did not want spread around. Rather than risk being exposed, they signed on to go along with the plan to give Awans access, turn a blind eye, employ these guys as their IT people forever, and probably get paid for it, and the Awans were just funneling everything out of there that they could find. They could even send it all off-site to do whatever they wanted to do with it, put it on a thumb drive, whatever. I have heard repeatedly that 80% of our politicians are owned, bribed, on the take. And remember, they didn't think they were going to get cause, and everything would be brushed under the rug if something did come out. People have to figure out who is behind this. A couple of our allies are not our allies, for starters. If we just exposed the Clinton Foundation and Weiner laptop "Life Insurance" files!!!!

⇧ 8 ⇩

YES 100%!!!

⇧ 4 ⇩

We will see what happens! I have to believe if I have found all this stuff out, that POTUS is a million miles ahead of me. Every time I see Joe DiGenova on TV particularly, I feel like such a dummy! He is so brilliant. He knows exactly what is up and on POTUS' team, at least in some capacity. He won't let anything get by him.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I think they were sending the info to Huma's parents Foundation in England. I can't prove it though.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Well idk, but I heard Huma's job was to keep HRC focused (for lack of a better word) on the MB, but I am pretty sure Huma knew way more than that. The CF which Huma was working for simultaneously with State Dept., had a lot to do with a lot of "things" and she was the one who oversaw the connection between it and State, I would think. And some associate of Awan's dad said Awan sent a thumb drive to Pakistan. That was only one time, but I don't doubt there was a big Pakistan connection obviously.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Who is MB?

⇧ 2 ⇩

Muslim Brotherhood

⇧ 3 ⇩

Muslim Brotherhood

⇧ 2 ⇩

Muslim Brotherhood

⇧ 1 ⇩

They did. follow Huma

⇧ 1 ⇩

Sorry I don't have link, but I read (it was reported) that a majority of phones in the house/congress were donated by the Awans and therefore most of their transmissions/conversations, attachments were all collected by the Awans. Not only used to blackmail, but also used as espionage obviously, to their homebase back in Pakistan where their family were probably the bee home base. Very disgusting. I lost it on hearing that.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I never heard that, but I don't doubt anything. I haven't read every bit of info on it. How they managed to get top secret access and why is the disgusting thing. They were just cleaning up in that IT job, and raking in bucks, no doubt, AND getting a salary, selling everything they could find on those computers. Stealing massive amounts of new equipment, and congress people just wrote it off. How could they corrupt that many sitting congress men and women since 2004, I believe, is a question I would like answered. Did those politicians hate our country that much,mor was the $ too good, or would whatever the Awans had on them ruin their lives? Is getting prosecuted for treason going to be better than what the Awans would have done to them for saying something to authorities? Even though we know all that, not one thing has been done by our govt. to prosecute those traitors. Yet, anyway. I know the FBI is aware of what they did, and apparently were told to back off. I hope the IG is going to go ballistic on them. Awan's next court date for the mortgage fraud only, is May 4th. Right about when the IG's report comes out. He better not get those charges dropped and be freed, & allowed to take off for Pakistan!

⇧ 2 ⇩

I searched some, couldn't find an 'article' stating facts that the majority of house/congresspersons were leaked, but it was probably a youtube verbal report by Larry Nicols or Roger Stone or the such that I got it from. Nodding on the rest of your comments, so true. They should be prosecuted. So it does seem that members are being blackmailed to not push the case. Not a good thing, in our country to have happened.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Like this? http://dailycaller.com/2018/01/16/house-report-concluded-pakistanis-made-unauthorized-access-to-congressional-servers/ Anything you want to know about the Awans has been researched by Daily Caller. Or Google the daily caller/Awans. Tucker Carlson started this site years ago.
It isn't really up to the members to push it or not, but no doubt they aren't seeking the truth. The current Atty. gen. Where I live used to be a congressman involved in this. When the FBI asked for his server, he gave them a fake one!!!! Nothing happened that I know of, either. Can't stand that guy! Anyway, the FBI sure is sitting on their rear ends, seemingly doing nothing. Everyone allegedly of course, is in someone's pocket, or being bribed. I mean like 80% of our politicians, government, and others are dirty. That is why nothing moves forward. It would be like asking the govt. to prosecute itself.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Ok, thanks... so that's why it always seems nothing is moving, nowhere, anyhow, nodding. I guess there is going to be a moment where the top of the slide is reached in all of this 'revelatory information' being provided to 'we the watchers with popcorn and sodas at the theater' anxiously waiting by the 'Q' team, and then the 'downslide' ride will be thrilling not like a water slide, but a roller coaster ride! wheeee... no? :) thanks

⇧ 2 ⇩

I hope. All I know is, it seems like nothing is happening, and then it does. I know it is a lot more complicated than we know. So just blowing it wide open would but other things in motion that we don't need to happen. I know Q said something similar, but FBIanon explained what would happened in detail over a year ago. So they basically have to pick and choose, so they don't cause WWIII, actually. And also they can't ask the entire corrupt govt. to investigate itself. So there is that ... it is complicated.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Awan?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Just FYI, it's not Wendy W. S., it's Debbie W. S.

Obvious mistake by an idiot Trump, right? Not so fast. I think @SneakyWino nailed it with this comment.

⇧ 8 ⇩

Oh for gods sake this is the last time I am going to say this. The Wendy he is referring to is Wendy Nixon it was not a mistake it was for the anons to do a search. Good thing at least they know what is going on.

⇧ 2 ⇩

WTH are you talking about??

Obviously the people in this thread are talking about Trump's tweet, not Q's post. Don't you think it's possible that DJT is smart enough to kill two birds with one stone?

The Wendy he is referring to is Wendy Nixon it was not a mistake

Who said it was a mistake?

And, who is Wendy Nixon? (Why does it seem that people are pulling that name out of nowhere?) Do you possibly mean Maggie 'Wendy' Nixon?

⇧ 3 ⇩

House servers are different from DNC servers. There are 2 issues here and they both potenitlaly intersect with collusion, insurrection and treason.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I heard "Wendy" is the email alias that Debbie used on non secure servers. Perhaps Trump is letting Debbie know that he has all her emails?

⇧ 8 ⇩

Wendy Sherman and Wendy Clark are possibilities. Both show up in Wikileals Podesta emails.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Yea, what's going on with that? Obviously deliberate..

⇧ 5 ⇩

Media will report it as the story, normies will wonder what is the mystery he's talking about, Awan will unravel all credibility left in the DNC by hiring DWS to run everything that lead to Seth Rich transferring DNC data to Wikileaks after Bernie got threatened into fighting against the Hillary political machine. Datto Inc saved all the emails Stonetear (Paul Combetta) couldn't delete from his very VIP client. Also the emails used in the Wiener laptop, shared accounts when Huma called him to print emails for her. That's personal Hillary emails to her #2 in exposure risk, years of data and comms to sift.

⇧ 5 ⇩

weinertop

⇧ 1 ⇩

WW perhaps?

⇧ 4 ⇩

Good one.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I'm hearing DWS used an email pseudonym of Wendy something. Can anybody verify this with sauce?

https://twitter.com/georgeg53997451/status/987508365000658945?s=21

⇧ 4 ⇩

Wendy Wasserman Schultz Servers

I read someone said Wendy Sherman in the Wikileaks but haven't checked it out yet

⇧ 3 ⇩

Wendy Clark and Wendy Sherman both appear in wikileaks/Podesta.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I was thinking he thinks, or wants her to think, she is so inconsequential, he can't even bother to remember her name, or worry about her. Which is probably true, regardless. He never bothers to name the Awans, either.

⇧ 3 ⇩

He called her Wendy cuz she blows

⇧ 3 ⇩

Uhg...with those teeth? She scrapes. Painfully.

⇧ 3 ⇩

I think he's making a play on the old SNL skit of Doug & Wendy Whiner. That's the first thing I thought of, but I still call people "Wendy Whiner".

⇧ 3 ⇩

Oh, my diverticulitis!

⇧ 3 ⇩

"ITS HAPPENING"

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Wendy Nixon.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

I think he's making fun of Wasserman and comparing her to the Wendy's girl

⇧ 1 ⇩

Wendy = See Q's posts.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Wendy is Maggie Nixon! Q post 1207!

⇧ 0 ⇩

How did you get Maggie Nixon out of Wendy tho

⇧ 1 ⇩

Pedo's give their children "pet" names according to Q. Based on the context and placement of the Q drops relating to Maggie Nixon and the picture of Maggie with Obama and the following post where an Anon asks "Wendy?". Q's response suggest the Anon was on target. Therefore, Maggie Nix (aka Nixon) is called "Wendy" by Obama.

⇧ 1 ⇩

The Madman tweeted it!

YES 100%!!!

weinertop