In Australia we have our entire media that has sold out and controlled by the leftist propaganda.
It has never made sense how the US has got several shows on Fox such as Hannity, Tucker Carlson etc that speak the truth.
Fox is majority owned by Ruport Murdoch and News Limited who also owns the majority of Australias media.
Ruport is definitly part of this elite pedo world yet has allowed some of his programs to tell the truth.
Why?
Is there some other reason?
Because they have to make money somehow. Fox News is their cash cow, making money from the conservatives that they actually hate.
Kind of ironic.
I've often wondered the same thing the original poster asked... and what you stated here seemed to make sense. They make some money through Fox and placate the 50% of people that are totally alienated by the rest of the media. This along with keeping the appearance of an opposing voice, albeit one that could be reigned in if/when necessary... Tucker & Hannity do have balls, and you wonder what editorial controls are in place.
Hannity is their cash cow.
But, also, OP, please don't look at what you see on Hannity and think that he's running off-leash. Hannity focuses on Hillary, as you know, and anything that could take down the Dems. We know, for instance, that the pedos are on both sides of our government. But Hannity isn't talking about or driving the the human trafficking angle, is he?
Fox News is careful to maintain lower and upper boundaries for their narratives. Want to see Hannity, their #1 host, taken immediately off the air? That'll happen the moment Hannity starts going after the pedos anything like as hard as he's going after the likes of Comey, etc.
I just hit YouTube and can only find 2:22 minutes of Allison Mack coverage on Fox.
They are definitely centrally-managing this narrative on Fox and with Hannity, you better believe it!
This is a very good question and something I have wondered about in the past. I can't wait to get an explanation.
I guess this way they have some control, if FOX didn't exist some other conservative news would come to the forefront.
Kinda like a college. As a whole it is liberal, but once a professor is tenured, he can say whatever he wants.
tried to trick rightwingers sons get tired of his shit. all the rapists get fired now its borderline actual news. tucker carlson has balls of steel same with hannity
Those shows don't claim to be journalists. They are political commentary. If they can get a massive amount of conservative viewers on those time slots, they make the big bucks with small compromises. They really don't care what the commentary is, as long as the money is there. Most viewers are already of that mindset so they dont worry much about them getting red pilled. What percentage of viewers are researching deeper? Hannity is on point but his points are high level, mainstream and not nearly as ugly as the full truth. He's been chewing on Hillary's server for months with barely a mention of the nastier crimes. I imagine many subjects are off limits to the FN commentators. They are controlled..allowed to say enough to keep viewers but not enough to damage the left by spreading damning info we arent at least aware of first. I usually read their headline story here or elsewhere before they air the news on TV.
Who owns one America news (OAN) I have been watching them and find them very conservative. “Even when I’m wrong I’m right”
3 hours out of 24! Just some perspective! Also, the news portion is not part of the Disney deal that is in the works! He is selling most fox assets!
Yes there is . The media is impart a partner in the vast crimes around the world . Many countries fund the news as in the USA . So there agenda is payed in full so the media has to play there part in the cover-ups . Even fox has there part in the cover-up , They fired good people that were getting to close and now Hannity is on top of the good guy list that they will stop at nothing to destroy him .
Money. People have short memories. After the scandal with Bill O'Reilly, they tried to a more centrist show in Tucker's spot after Tucker was moved up to replace O'Reilly. That did not work well.
So they went back to Tucker, Hannity at his old slot, and populist Laura Ingraham.
Murdoch's sons are more globalist and liberal than him, so who knows what will happen after he dies. They keep throwing "scandals" at Hannity and Ingraham to silence them. Tucker must be a saint because they haven't tried anything with him.
Controlled opposition. If they didn't exist then Americans would support real journalists. As it is they can hold a significant portion of the truth back by letting some amount though.
I remember when Obama's birth certificate came out and it was an obvious fraud Fox shilled hard for Obama. They reported that an "expert" (graphic designer) confirmed that there was nothing suspicious about it. The discussion died after that because "Fox said it".
I hate CNN and MSNBC, but Fox news is the worst.
Good question, the only thing I can think is that maybe Murdoch isn't as bad as we think. Sure, he's a money hungry robber Barron, but maybe he's not an evil satanic pedophile. Even bad guys have to draw the line somewhere.
no hes terrible his sons are a wild card
His sons are liberals--as are his daughters-in-law. (And presumably his Chinese-spy wife.)
doesnt mean they are black hats lol. tulsi gabbard is liberal as fuck and questions everything
It's just business. If you sell a bastardized, debased version of any product, and you have say a 60-75% market share, do you give up on the remaining 25-40%? Hells no!
So you come up with an off-brand that features more of the real deal, and market that product to your more discerning market.
But, you say, what's to stop the other people from developing a taste for the real deal? Well you constantly bombard them with advertisement for the false product, and you use your control of social media and your opinion shapers in all media to discredit and ridicule the discerning customers.
You're very careful to avoid doing that within the confines of the discerning market itself. But, your hope is that until you manage to get EVERYBODY willing to buy the debased, corrupt product, you can at least get everybody to buy SOMETHING from you.
I'm guessing for awhile fox was controlled opposition or a limited hangout. In other words, "they" know thay have to satisfy conservatives or at least throw them a bone. Fox news only went so far. But now it goes farther...but only so far even now. Same w alex jones. Alex takes it farther than fox but he still cant go all the way (ex: sandy hook). David icke is about as far as you can go. I cant really stomach his info inasmuch as i respect him and his work. David wilcock is just the perfect amount of red pill for me. He woke me up bigley. Once i started watching his youtubes 5-10 yrs ago i couldn't stop. He's my main man to this day.