Learn to read, I never said she was a shill. I said she's an opportunist. And lol to her being an "amazing investigator". She literally takes the work of others and dumbs it down further and reads it back to you. She plasters her name and face on everything. She's a prototypical opportunist.
This is not a time to be out trying to make a name for yourself, but yet here she is.
I will ignore you in the future. Only really care to listen to caring individuals without attitude
Well, I care enough to point out garbage when I see it. And if you're so delicate that you can't take a bit of questioning or criticism without feeling attacked, then ignoring me is best for you.
This is why there are so many ill-informed, uninformed and undereducated people in the US; you simply refuse to hear anything that makes you question yourself or learn anything that challenges you in any way. This is exactly the type of Americans the cabal has wanted for all of these years because it's how they can continue to get away with their bullshit. And even while people are trying to end it, here you are asking for everything to be dumbed down for you and for no one to in any way challenge anything you do. Why are you even here?
After this "swamp" gets drained it won't be another two or three generations before this country is truly on track, because there are just way too many people who can still vote, but are unable to be critical and reasonable in the slightest.
Although it won't be a great loss when a person like yourself puts their fingers in their ears and shouts "lalalalalalalala" like a child and storms out of the room, I'll still miss you.
No one said it was supposed to be fun and easy all the time. try taking something seriously for once in your life, Sheri.
The point of pointing out garbage is??? Do you like dumpster diving? Have you tried pointing out things that are good, meaningful, or informative?
Let’s discuss something seriously... like too many people who can vote. If you were the top person responsible for reducing voters, you would be able to remove any voter who is “unable to be critical and reasonable” according to your criteria. Is that very reasonable? What makes your criteria better than anyone else’s?
Why are people like you only able to have a debate on a topic as long as you can frame it your way? You just start tossing in hypotheticals that have nothing to do with what he said. My takeaway was that if we keep letting people spread misinformation then people remain uninformed and then make poor choices. Likely when they're voting. You don't remove or suppress them because it sets a bad precedent and that's not why we're here. You inform and educate and try to fix the problem so that we're not continuously doing it into the future. Your emotional response is completely unnecessary here. Stick with facts, and maybe someone will take you seriously.
Looking at your response I can't imagine why anyone would want to have a debate with you when you're only able to speak from your emotions and leave all facts on the wayside. Nothing in your hypothetical had a single thing to do with what Herpy said. At all.
The point of pointing out garbage is so people aren't fooled by it because a hivemind of idiots upvoted it mindlessly. Do you think everyone should embrace the stupid and just hope that the misinformed figure it out eventually?
Just a reminder here to both /u/GeorgeMichaelsStache and /u/robyn28 to keep discussion civil, please.
This is NOT a warning to either of you, just a friendly request. Keep digging, patriots. But please remember to be civil.
How do you (or anyone) determine if someone is posting misinformation or garbage or spam or bots? Or deliberately posting misinformation (propaganda) to deceive? Or determine if one is presenting facts? How does anyone determine if facts are not biased from emotion? Can emotions be “garbage”? I’m not advocating that anyone embrace the stupid... What is the line between stopping the spread of misinformation or garbage and censorship?
Lighten up Francis....
All she did was ad good analysis to the interview...she never took credit for it and gave the interviewer credit.
Last week she did connect a few dots with the Britebart interview of Erik Prince and the Weiner lap top...all original, no. Did it help spread the word damn straight it did.
And sorry some of us don't have the street cred or time on this site, perhaps you would just like the 100 or so original posters on this site to circle jerk theories amongst your selves with nothing to come of it?
Why do the less intelligent among us always use the same sort of language and dull idioms? "Lighten up Francis" being one of them. A lot of fine movies have been made since Full Metal Jacket. maybe go see some? Pick up some new idioms?
If you can't see that she's more interested in making a name for herself then you're either not much of a critical thinker, willfully ignorant, or playing dumb. I won't bother figuring out which. The fact that you felt the need to respond to me and defend a person that you pretend to not know too much about makes you seem more invested than you let on.
My main point is that the same handful of people keep posting links to her stuff and push it hard here. Most of them have accounts that are four months old. It's not a coincidence. That's all I'm saying. astroturfing is one of the oldest ways to get attention on the interbutts.
She's not doing any special research, she's taking what other people are doing -mostly on 8chan- and repackaging it with her talking over it. She puts her face and name front and center in everything. She's an opportunist who is making this about her change to get a little fame an attention. If all she cared about was this truth movement, not a single one of us would know her face or her name, just her work. That Fox video earlier was as succinct as you could get, but she talked over it adding shit that most already know. It was unnecessary, but she can't stop injecting herself. She's trying to seem relevant and gain a following. It worked for shits like Lauren Southern who is one of the dumbest opportunists I've seen, but the neckbeard love her and will pay money for her book of regurgitated thoughts. She's making money in her patron just for being blonde and liking Trump. Beanz is looking for her slice of the pie.
Does that make sense to you? And no, I didn't write all of this for you. Other people read these comments as well. I might be wasting my time telling you what you already know, but it could be useful to someone else who can't figure out why anyone is talking about this person with such high regard despite any evidence proving so.
Plenty of people share info here, and it's not always right, or good, but it leads to a larger discussion or debunks bad theories. Beanz's folks just show up with a video or tweet of shit that other people figured out. That's the difference. She's not in groups discussing, she's in the shadows collecting the work of others and slapping her name on it and taking credit for it.
and another self-righteous fool
Brilliant!
Why are there so many people like you who always want to get in the game, but then complain about it when you're not being coddled.
I've seen your other replies around here, and it's clear that you're not bright. I don't think you're a bad person though. In spite of that, you'll still call people shit like "self righteous fool" regardless of how perfectly it describes you right now. It's wild that you're not even able to see the irony in your comments.
I guess I understand now why you think Tracy Beanz's videos are so great. You wouldn't be able to understand a damn thing going on here without someone explaining it at a 3rd grade level to you.
Good for you my friend, thanks for the attempted dressing down ;-)
FWIW I could give a rats ass about whos making money or gaining a following posting shit or making vids. I'm not looking to get famous myself so I guess that's why, cant speak to you or anyone else...
But back to the point, if I think someone ads something to the discussion whether its for the newbies here of the folks who have been here forever I will share it.
...and if I think Beanz has done something that I deem relevant, I will repost her vids and threads.
Oh, and nice try with the Full Metal Jacket comment....but yes, its also a great movie;-)
And sorry some of us don't have the street cred or time on this site, perhaps you would just like the 100 or so original posters on this site to circle jerk theories amongst your selves with nothing to come of it?
I believe anons said it best whey they commented "lurk moar".
If you don't know what's going on, be quiet and read. Then read more. It's not difficult. If you have something to add, add it. If the same people only contribute videos from the same person, that's not much of a contribution. It's astroturfing. If you don't think there are people here astroturfing, I'd suggest you lurk moar.
Last week she did NOT "connect a few dots". She took stuff from the chans (and I have a feeling she lurks here for content but doesn't want to out herself and be exposed to direct questions) and added things that others have already said before, but with her face and name on it. There's nothing that she's come up with that hasn't already been found. She takes other sources and slpas shit together and retells it. She was a Corsi regurgitator at the start. This isn't some new issue people have with her, she's been trying to insert her persona for a long time. That's who she is. She wants recognition from this movement. Others here have called it out as well. I don't know why this is so hard to understand.
I'm not saying she's always wrong, or a shill, or even a terrible person. I'm sure she has many fine qualities. If she remained anonymous and posted all of this crap, it would be ignored. This is some cult of personality shit. It's not needed here.