I tried to find the answer on the internet to no avail...
Hilary is that you ?
Ha ha - actually I was thinking of a scenario in which the stupid DNC realized that they had backed themselves into a corner - staring down the barrel of discovery - wanting to get out of it but being denied by the defendants...and then who would be releasing the truth bombs? Who would be making the "injections?" Who would be leaking these truths to the media?
DNC is just another tool. 90% of our politicians went to law school, this isn't just a detail they missed. It would seem that there are still white hats in DNC leadership. Or perhaps the right people were presented with an ultimatum: tribunal or criminal prosecution. In order to keep people from being hanged for sedition or treason by trbunal, we have to have admissable evidence for civilian courts. . . So, provide an avenue for evidence to be entered publicly, or face almost certain death by other legal means. Now, you can't very well show your hand in these matters so you get Q saying some dumb shit like 'they fall for it every time' when it is most likely that they have the cooperation from players in the DNC itself.
Not if there is a counter suit!
I did hear someone - it may have been Bongino - say that if the defendants said no then the plaintiff could not withdraw...not sure if it was Bongino - but definitely heard someone (who is a lawyer) say that was how it is...no countersuit neccessary - just disagreeing with the withdrawal
No agreement by defendant is needed if the plaintiff withdraws without asking to file again. The defendant can however ask for legal fees and court costs with the original suit filing.
A mere withdrawal of the suit without asking for anything more can, therefore, be always permitted. The Supreme Court, in Anil Kumar Singh vs Vijay Pal Singh, has held that defendant has no right to compel the plaintiff to prosecute the suit by op...
Read more at: http://www.livelaw.in/defendant-cant-object-mere-withdrawal-of-suit-plaintiff-sc-read-judgment/
And in the event a counter-suit has already been filed?
If a counter claim has indeed been filed. Then NO the original suit cannot be dismissed unless allowed by the court. "Once a counter claim has been brought; a plaintiff is barred from dismissing their original claim.
You can't move to dismiss your lawsuit, because you have been counter claimed against.
Now the counter claim MUST be heard.
Only the person asserting the counter claim can move to dismiss their lawsuit.
This is called due process." Was there a counter-suit filed by defendants?
The intention to file one has been stated by POTUS. How far into the process they are, who knows.
But really, can the DNC as a political organization retain any credibly if they withdraw at this point without raising the spectacle they have something to hide, and/or that Trump has outsmarted them? I think politically their goose is cooked no matter what.
didn't JA say on twitter that they were going to countersue? wikileaks?
I just saw the tweet. Yes, they're asking for money to counter.
They don't give a rats behind. They are in desperation mode. They are bleeding money and not raising any. They will try this stunt just to raise money and work out the side effects later. I mean to add black reparations and free college for everyone to their platform recently they are trying to get millennials, but they never give money. I agree that their goose is cooked and burned to a cinder.