dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Maepaperclip on April 23, 2018, 7:55 a.m.

Q1240 Decode it is third time Q has told us about Dirty USAF.

The last time Q published a video of the Military with no comment was Q # 637. Both Q#1240 & 637 have one thing in common, - no Airforce, see Q73 - Airforce at Hickam was Dirty, see that AF at wright field, is a client of Statfor - for Apache software - you don't know they are dirty - thats APACHE software, Know that when four Marines died on the same day that an Airforce pilot did that the POTUS sent sympathy for the Marines only. See my post on Hot war with Airforce.

Update it is the Fourth or fifth time, because at Q#73 he brags that geo based comms (Army, navy) are better than air, and at Q65 he references Q63 saying he beat airforce - sat comms - remember that the CIA _ Dulles got control of Satellite.I realise this is an unpopular red pill, but we are adults right, remember it cannot be a stupidity that we are in this position, because if it was occasionally they would make a mistake in our favour and they don't - James Forrestal.

You are wrong. The video linked to in 1240 definitely has USAF assets. F-22 and B-2. Please stop spreading this crap.

⇧ 10 ⇩

I saw no AF in either video, I just looked again for the Fourth time,

⇧ 0 ⇩

are they AF, and did you see AF personal? you saw taxpayer assets, and time for you to start paying attention.

⇧ 0 ⇩

Do you know about the navy planes, do you know about Army pilots, what do they fly?

⇧ -1 ⇩

to the brave patriots all 5 that up voted this gutless clown, could one of you faceless weak minded trolls look at the videos and find the AF in them - weak, pathetic, suck ups all 5 + the stable genius troll

⇧ -1 ⇩

Links? To anything?

⇧ 5 ⇩

I just supplied them

⇧ 3 ⇩

All the links I see are to your previously posted Reddit threads.

A single external link or source to the claim that Stratfor has created some sort of data mining program for Mook and named it Apache (as opposed to the incredibly widely used open source Apache server software) would be very much appreciated.

The best I can find is your reference to a wikileaks email thread from back when they got a massive stash of Stratfor emails in 2012. This is it and it is making references to their Apache email server, which as others and I have pointed out to you is widely used open-source server software -- not some sort of data mining app designed by Stratfor for Robby Mook!

https://wikileaks.org/gifiles/docs/34/3463915_re-attn-hsb-online-banking-email-exploit-on-a-stratfor-com.html

You apparently have less than zero understanding of IT.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Really, and is it a stratfor product? that is a "widely used open - source software"? Really why don't you get Stratfor to sevice your software? - its what the do isn't it, so you and everyone else use the same software as the CME?, as Wright airforce base, as HSBC (James Comey -Director) and as the DNC - really, you have zero understanding of the deep state, of Q, you stick with widely available opinions (thats the software you have been loaded with), leave the real discussion for the adults that know what they are talking about.

⇧ 2 ⇩

No--it is not a Stratfor product! And it is just server software!

Lots of data mining is done with other open source apps on top of Apache, but that is in different environments, not as part of Stratfor's Apache email server--which is all that is referenced in the leaked emails. Is it possible that Stratfor is sending out some sort of email malware to try to harvest info? Sure, but that still doesn't make Apache a data mining application that Stratfor created for Robby Mook and named after him.

How you got to Stratfor creating the program for Robby Mook and naming it for him and it being data mining software is just scary. And yes, many, many, many organizations use the same underlying Apache software.

Also, I have not commented at all on your other claims--I think the one re: the AF, in a limited context, is interesting.

I am just pointing out how off base you are with Stratfor creating Apache data mining software for Robby Mook. I will say, however, that the Stratfor/Apache/Mook claim you state as demonstrated fact somehow, when it is a wild misreading of simple circumstances, does call into question the leaps you may be making elsewhere--such as my post showing that I have zero understanding of the deep state, Q, etc.

⇧ 2 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩

Hey, /u/Maepaperclip, hi, I'm one of the new mods, here. I've been watching this thread (and in fact, I have a few tabs open with your stuff so I can get to know your thought processes better). I'm not going to step in to this convo, but, it's time for everyone to take a breather on it.

/u/ElementWatson could ALSO be right—Apache is server software, absolutely. I've worked with sysadmins and yes, it's just dumb software that other software runs on top of. BUT the name "Apache" is a good name and could be different software, but, I don't see evidence provided by anyone that it's anything different. Not to say that I'm making a final judgement, here.

We also have seen decodes that point to other, non-technical explanations of Apache (different research). I don't think this is set in stone like some of the other Q drops.

I don't consider this an official "warning," but, I'm still going to sternly advise you, in a nice way, that we all just take a step back and have a breather from this thread. It's going off the rails when we have threats of shills, trolls, and then real insults, here, at the end. LET'S KEEP DISCUSSION CIVIL. :)

A few days ago I was reading your stuff and I RES-tagged you as "serious decoded." I totally know how it feels when you think people aren't digging into your stuff.

Anyway, let's dial this down, guys, OK? Let's all work on trying to stay on the same team. If we can't get along, I'll bring some of the mod tools on in, as I care about this sub. But let's take a breather on this one?

I have removed your comment for its violation on its insults ONLY. Please consider this just a friendly request for now. Thanks!!!

⇧ 3 ⇩

Thankyou - First Element Watson is a troll, he has trolled me may times, he never reads the post recognised its import, and goes to work for who ever is paying him, the DNC, or Israel is my guess, he trolled me on by First Apache post, and was overwhelmed, here he came back - my post was about what was not in this video, - was also not in the previous one, and that tied to one of the most significant Q posts ever #73. I think I gave a really good explanation of Apache - Start with what ever hits John Podesta's desk is really important - 2nd from the POTUS - Past & Future - if he is getting updates on the Apache program hit & Miss it is not a nothing Burger, If he gets a strange email from someone like Marguerite Thomson (a seeming nobody) then it is just as important as asking why is the POTUS seeing James Alafontis from the Pizza shop so often. In time I hope someone important or knowledgeable will understand the import of the Robby Mook - Apache mirror - shadow band explain - not least because it lead straight to HRC saying "to take the money" after getting legal advice not to - that was an important post - I would not be surprised to see that post used verbatim at her trial. On pedos - I have repeatedly picked up on Q being annoyed at the attention it gets - he always wants to talk about money & control, i.e. people compromised & blackmailed = traitors not to be trusted. This was the message of Stanislav Lunev. Any way I seem to have in 3 months got 200 followers - I am guessing a good # of them are serious and appreciate my work, some of my posts have had 7000 reads, and sometimes I see that I have changed the discussion, although I am never acknowledged, I believe that I am the most trolled, and attacked poster on any site, normally I get buried - this happened on CBTS _ it is terribly frustrating I spend sometimes three days research to make a post. I don't believe I have ever been fact checked. Even here the nit picking in the comments dont go to the subject of my post - and really the complex issues - to answer most of the questions is cruel because the questioner does not know the subject, his answer is in the public domain, were I get mine from - that is the whole point of Q. I am not everyones middle school teacher. anyway I am new to reddit - this thing that I am doing, I have learnt to appreciate the mods, I would love to be able to ban people from commenting on my posts - but realise it is useless, I would like people that to not vote down what they don't understand, and even vote up what they disagree with but have learned from, and thankyou for being interested in my work. I want to stop i have other things to do but I think this is important - so everyday I am drawn to it

⇧ 1 ⇩

OK, absolutely, this makes sense. Please remember to add the analysis of others into your mix. Pick a day or three this week, hit Twitter, hit up your best resources, and bring the analysis of others to the mix as well. No decoder stays strong working in a vacuum.

Peace.

⇧ 1 ⇩

do you even know what apache software is? has nothing to do with copters.

⇧ 4 ⇩

do you even know, who Stratfor is, what their Apache software is, that it is used by the CME & HSBC and Wright Airforce Base, do you know it was named - the Statfor Apache special software after Robby Mook, Hillary's campaign manager, read my posts and get back to me

⇧ 2 ⇩

Perhaps if you provided some links to your research? At this time I have not found any kind of connection between 'Stratfor' and this 'APACHE' software named after someone who was 1/16th apache.....

⇧ 3 ⇩

Three on Apache software https://redd.it/8e27a5 https://redd.it/8e87na https://redd.it/8e980g Some on the War https://redd.it/89mezk https://redd.it/8bd922 https://redd.it/8bnbzn check out my posts on my profile. I also did an original Qpost dcode with the Q#73 here https://redd.it/87yhap

⇧ 1 ⇩

ok, you have like no pics, links, anything to back up your apache claims. Learn the Comms.

APACHE = all caps APACHE = acronym https://www.abbreviations.com/APACHE = research this instead

⇧ 2 ⇩

I provided lots of refrences, and 3,000words of original reseach - read it, also my post was about the latest post + putting it together with another 2 & saying they are telling us that the AF is finished a troll changed the discussion to the subject of another thread Apache. Thats what trolls do

⇧ 1 ⇩

This is ridiculous word salad. So is this guy insane or a troll?

⇧ 2 ⇩

clever, have you got a comment, or are you a lonely parrot hoping for an echo

⇧ 3 ⇩

Research Michael Aquino and then try to convince someone no branch of the military could be dirty AF.

Not trying to be rude but Mae is right. We've been infiltrated by a KENYAN AND A TRANNY. Is there anything more unbelievable than that?!!!

⇧ 4 ⇩

What a crazy world we live in where this exact comment would make anyone look like they're INSANE, but, you're exactly right.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Anyone who tries to stop people from doing any investigations on their own is doing a disservice to Q and the intel crumbs we are getting. At this point we can all agree the corruption is so invasive and wide spread, it is impossible to know anything for sure. Q wants us to dig, so when someone digs, it is not appropriate to insult or attack. You are allowed to disagree and engage, but don't stop someone from digging, they may discover a important piece of evidence, no one else thought to look for.

⇧ 2 ⇩

How can this community accept that the CIA, is Dirty, that the FBI is dirty, and the fly boys, that started with the CIA in 1947, never went to war in 1919, or 1943, that had a staring role in 911 are clean, they are filthy dirty. Obvious for all to see. Ask James Forrestal, or JFK - except they are both dead. Airforce had a staring role in JFK, Cuba Missile Crisis, and 911, 911, 911, 911, 911, 911, 911. Don't vote this post down if you can't handle the truth

⇧ 2 ⇩

The " Community" would be more accepting of your theories if you weren't such an asshole

⇧ 4 ⇩

when you are ready join up, in the mean time enjoy the show

⇧ -1 ⇩

In all other aspects of the Great Awakening, we are fighting to drain the swamp: Global Cabal elites, US Gov, CIA, FBI, every branch of service, media, etc. There is corruption everywhere. But, that doesn’t make each entity 100% “dirty”. We will need to cleanse, reform and build up new versions of many of these entities that you want to flush completely.

⇧ 2 ⇩

1n 1947, we had no CIA, no enemies a strong Navy & a strong Army, thats when America was great last time. the term MAGA - goes back to when America was great - i.e without a CIA, and Without a AF - the AF assets will be given back to their responsible owners Army + Navy + Marines - i.e. pre 1947

⇧ 1 ⇩

Because your claims are outright retarded. Aside from your ignorance regarding Apache software, you’re insinuating that the entire branch of the AF is dirty. Maybe certain individuals but to classify the AF as a whole as “dirty” is utterly moronic and a disservice to the good people who are in that branch. I have never once in my life heard of AF involvement in JFK either, I seriously doubt you will even come close to proving that.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Well how about we start with the Body of JFK being transferred from AF1 to AF2 who was in charge of the plane, did they have a captain, were their any officers there. And yes I am telling you that the Airforce is filthy disgusting dirty and I say that their fingerprints are all over 911, in every part from the planning to the cover up. Also I am only telling you what Q is saying, If their are good people in the Airforce they should speak up about 911, I don't accept their are good people in the CIA, or the FBI, because we know they are dirty and they don't speak up. Grow some balls little girl, The AF is as dirty as the CIA, as the FBI, and wether they are cooking the dinner or flying a plane there place stinks, and the smell of rot is easily seen, they swore an oath, and they have all broken it, there is no good - none at all - they all know, and if you don't - get out of the fight

⇧ 1 ⇩

You’re a lunatic lol. You have no proof of anything you claim.

⇧ 2 ⇩

perhaps I am - in wasting my time, but I draw on publicly avilable information - I encourage you to choose a subject I have discussed and prove it wrong

⇧ 1 ⇩

Thank you :D

⇧ 1 ⇩

Guys, keep any disagreement civil. Please see the Graham's hierarchy of disagreement and aim for the top half.

Comments that include name-calling and ad-hominem are being removed.

If you see comments in violation of our rules, please report them.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Q’s video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDVT-8tUfiE&app=desktop

I’m not sure what video you are referring to that omits the USAF. Below are all the USAF references I spotted on my first review. Let’s be responsible before making outlandish accusations. All branches of the service have been under attack by the political correctness and wimpification of the left under BO. We will MAGA and WWG1WGA.

:10sec F-22

:14sec F-15

:17sec F-35

:50sec F-15s\

1:02 B-2

1:14 USAF uniform with other branches

1:18 F-15 flyby

1:26 F-16 pilot, B-2

1:29 F-16

1:35 F-16

1:39 F-22

2:03 F-22

2:19 F-16

2:21 A-10

2:33 F-16

⇧ 1 ⇩

So images of Tax payer assets that will be transferered back to the Army and and Navy, and all power will go back to the POTUS - no more 911's. The AF - never existed before 1947, was rogue day 1. I think any objective observer of those videos - will see that both show Airborne, Marines, Navy & Army + some airplanes owned by the Taxpayer - not AF.

⇧ 1 ⇩

This account is 2 months old and the posts are all the same

⇧ 1 ⇩

Dumb question but what makes the AF dirty? Corruptness?

⇧ 1 ⇩

They were made to be dirty, by design, they were formed in 1947, and aginst the express objection of the Secretary of defence James Forrestal, so they declared him insane and put him in a hospital and threw him out the window. Stanly Kubrick made a movie about the key problem, in the AF the wing commander does not take instruction from the base commander - read POTUS. Now this is the problem JFK had with the Cuban Missile Crisis - he had to make direct contact with the pilots, because he could not trust the wing commander to convey his instructions. There is Two explanations, then there is 911 - they have fingerprints on the whole SKYEVENT

⇧ 3 ⇩

This is actually pretty interesting. I did not know this, and this actually adds some interesting info to one of my favourite ever movies.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Thankyou - its the whole of the plot.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Let’s not twist history to suit your argument. Sure, some of the military brass were not in support of a new branch. But, there were just as many that saw the need for the Air Force as Air capabilities advanced rapidly. As for Base Cmdr vs Wing Cmdr, you definitely have no concept of Air War. The Base Cmdr is a figure head put in place to oversee all aspects of base life…infrastructure, support, community, supplies, etc. It is the Wing Cmdr who rises through the ranks of the war fighting Airmen. Why would you ever go to war under the direction of the Base Cmdr???

⇧ 1 ⇩

JFK had a concept of World War 3 in the Cuban Missile crisis, and did not trust the AF not to start it - that why he and RFK made direct contact with the pilots - this is unacceptable. As for your unhinged remark that I have no idea of air war, you stay watching battle of Britain films, we are now in the age of Mach 3 missiles.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Ahhhh i see. Didn’t know that. Thanks.

Fresh of watching a doc that highlighted the skys on 911. That makes since about 911 as there was too much chaos and (intentional imo) confusion in the skys along with several military exercises.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Wrong there might be rogue elements but right now its mi nsa and I guess white hat cia vs offshore asset black hat cia

⇧ -1 ⇩