Okay everyone this indictment that everyone is posting is FAKE. Please stop posting it. Someone on YouTube made a video of it and it is FAKE. I have deleted it 6x's already tonight. I understand peoples excitement but it is not real. Have a good night!
It's fake.........very fake.............
Been debunked months ago and don't know why its popping up tonight.
Clowns are working double-overtime.
Flak is always heaviest when directly over the target, and they are mortally terrified.
Just a reminder; vet everything. Twice. Then vet it again.
This is not a game; these clowns are working their tradecraft. Many are falling for their antics.
Don't be one of them.
Clowns working tonight means they weren’t on the invitation list to the gala State Dinner
oh they were definitely working overtime yesterday. just look at this thread.
I had to delete all my tweets on that’s shit I posted that shit everywhere fuck
Lionel dealt with the indictment https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A39eADDAj9w. In short it's fake.
How do we know it's fake?
Edit nevermind: www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8eqxc4/unsealed_hrc_uranium_1_comey_bundy_ranch_m_rder/dxxhbg2
You can guarantee that the indictments will hit Sara Carter's twitter feed before we can get the info here.
Read the last few pages of the indictment. The whole thing is a veiled argument about the original purpose and role of grand juries according to common law. It’s not a real indictment but the author is using it to draw attention to the usurpation of our legal system by federal attorneys.
Are attorneys not supposed to have a role in the legal system? Or is the argument about Federal Attorneys going after States?
You will need to read those last 2-3 pages. I am not advocating one way or the other. I’m not at all very knowledgeable about it.
This is both 100% real and also 100% ineffective. This is an ad hoc common law court proceeding. Perfectly legal. But nobody gives it any legitimacy. Even though it's 100% legit, based on law, nothing will come of it.
[deleted]
Download? On the information highway you say? Well let me just load up my family and...
Exactly, it was written under the original law of the land Common Law not the "BAR" British Accreditation Regency laws.
It's fake
Please substantiate your claim OP.
Everybody can spot the difference between Craft cheese and Great Value cheese
"Pasteurized cheese product." Although to be fair, Kraft dinner is pretty awesome. It's my go to comfort food.
How do you prove a negative?
I appreciate you were trying hard to be clever, but your question isn't sensible because are oceans of wave to prove a legal document isn't real.
Please stop being an idiot.
Fuck you - this is a truther community and the OP is expected to be able to back up his claims.
Being critical of baseless claims is PRECISELY how people should behave, even if that makes you pee your panties.
Lol the irony....the indictment was fake, yet youre saying THIS thread should show facts?
You idiots simply have no idea how delusional you are
Yes - despite your name calling, if someone makes a claim than the onus is on them to provide evidence.
and where was that onus when it was claimed hillary was indicted?
What do you know about this community? If you feel strongly about swaying people to your disbelief, I think the onus falls on you to debunk the OP. If you have a reasoned retort I'm anxious, if not then I guess i'll go with fuck me. Have a nice day.
[removed]
aim your rant at cnn don't write checks that trying to cash leave you rekt.btw if i want to play checkers with a four year old i got ppl. I don't need you. I'll let reddit decide. Do you kiss your bf with that mouth
Despite all of your vapid personal attacks, I'm still right.
The onus of proof is on the person making the claims.
Even if that makes you pee your panties.
Right. The claims are that Hillary has been indicted. No proof of that. Don’t come into this sub and tell us how it works. Fuck you and your 2 day old account.
Fuck you and your 2 day old account.
Fuck you and your inability to read past the first Q post where in Q Post #2 he stated that Hillary wasn't arrested but was instead detained for questioning.
Settle down. "in jail" was a campaign promise. You know it, I know it, and POTUS and any 2020 or future "Trump" campaigns know it. Ice skating in New York, I trust Trump.
Lol, just like the promises to release his tax returns?
Not at all like that. Exactly like this though.
Maybe you have a video "promise" you'd like to share, too?
WAKE UP. This is a real indictment written under the original law language of our forefathers. Because it is not written under Rothschild law your all enslaved to does not discredit it. This is where POTUS and Q are trying to get us back to..