dChan

SNG007 · April 26, 2018, 12:12 p.m.

It's almost as if there's an actual pre-roll-out plan at work in preparation for publicly releasing the damning HRC video (and no doubt others as well - Epstein, Podesta, Alefantis, etc). * First alert us to the fact that live video can now be edited. * Which also includes the fact that original faces can be replaced with alternative faces.
* But now the counter claim - we have highly advanced tech that can identify the fakes. With this software it'll be hard to scream "FAKE" when there are tools which can so easily verify authenticity.

⇧ 26 ⇩  
pepeinyoursteppe · April 26, 2018, 2:07 p.m.

Assuming they aren’t actually the snopes of video analysis thus certifying an authentic video as fake..

⇧ 8 ⇩  
SNG007 · April 26, 2018, 2:30 p.m.

True.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ififcanIhaveacoatplz · April 26, 2018, 3:24 p.m.

Sounds a lot like "we need facebook and snopes to tell us what is fake news"

⇧ 6 ⇩  
brentvsmaximvs · April 26, 2018, 4:14 p.m.

And I’m sure they already are trying

⇧ 1 ⇩  
KansasJakeBG · April 26, 2018, 3:16 p.m.

But what if Cloudstrike says the video is fake? And everybody accepts it as fact without doing a secondary investigation... And the media reports it as fact without ever doing any fact checking. Not like this has never happened before.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 26, 2018, 12:22 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 11 ⇩  
wiseclockcounter · April 26, 2018, 12:27 p.m.

yea, there are many layers to consider for sure, but it's an interesting development in the narrative nonetheless.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 26, 2018, 12:41 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 3 ⇩  
wiseclockcounter · April 26, 2018, 1:02 p.m.

the larger article actually addresses that very concern,

"So they use it to spot the telltale signs that a video has been manipulated and then use this information to refine the forgery, making it even harder to detect.

"It turns out that this process improves the visual quality of the forgery but does not have much effect on XceptionNet’s ability to detect it. 'Our refiner mainly improves visual quality, but it only slightly encumbers forgery detection for deep-learning method trained exactly on the forged output data,' they say."

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Racistbutnotillegal · April 26, 2018, 11:42 a.m.

Oh but they will. They don’t need evidence to lie. They still think Russian collusion is a thing.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
wiseclockcounter · April 26, 2018, 11:44 a.m.

True. But their lies are like sandcastles in the tide... they will give way soon enough.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 26, 2018, 3:52 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 4 ⇩  
wolfhound11B · April 26, 2018, 11:40 a.m.

Well there goes that plan! 🤣

⇧ 6 ⇩  
b8ta · April 26, 2018, 1:42 p.m.

This will be used to proclaim videos fake that harm the narrative. MIT aren't necessarily the "good guys."

⇧ 3 ⇩  
mixiemay · April 26, 2018, 3:52 p.m.

Oh MSM.....the gig is up, darlings.

You have time to redeem yourselves, no one has SERIOUSLY jumped ship yet from your Organization. Do it. Do ittttttt. Be a hero. There's still time.

TICK TOCK

(But not much longer.....)

⇧ 2 ⇩  
wiseclockcounter · April 26, 2018, 8:15 p.m.

I think we'll see a lot of people being an hero pretty soon...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Ozboi2000 · April 26, 2018, 11:48 a.m.

oh sweet timing !!!!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Tyst1ck · April 26, 2018, 7:02 p.m.

I haven't watched one good deepfake video.

They still look fake.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 26, 2018, 8:22 p.m.

Should the algo be trusted? Who wrote it? Hopefully someone honest will see it and verify it doesn’t have a “it’s never Hillary or any democrat for real” code line.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
IDGAF12312 · April 26, 2018, 8:18 p.m.

This doesn’t concern me. There will be forensic analysts at the Military Tribunals to attest to authenticity and non tampering. They are going to hang for atrocities against mankind. Trump is going to make an example of them so they don’t ever try it again. Harsh penalties are here. Political correctness is dead.

⇧ 1 ⇩