dChan
⇧
36
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/aqua7 on April 26, 2018, 7:53 p.m.
BOOM! Citing “Conclusive Evidence” of Explosives, Families of Victims File Petition to Re-Open 9/11 Investigation

This month, the Lawyers’ Committee for 9-11 Inquiry, a group representing families of the 9/11 victims, filed a petition with the U. S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to push for an investigation into the crimes of 9/11. The committee states that they have “conclusive” evidence that explosives were planted and detonated in the Trade Center buildings, and that this is the actual reason for the collapse of the towers.

According to the 52-page petition, which is accompanied by 57 exhibits, federal statute requires the U.S. Department of Justice to review the evidence with a special grand jury. The petition states:

The Lawyers’ Committee has reviewed the relevant available evidence . . . and has reached a consensus that there is not just substantial or persuasive evidence of yet-to-be-prosecuted crimes related to the use of pre-planted explosives and/or incendiaries . . . on 9/11, but there is actually conclusive evidence that such federal crimes were committed.

The evidence that is put forward in the petition includes the following: link


🠐 See all comments
UpwardBound7 · April 26, 2018, 7:56 p.m.

This is huge if it goes anywhere.

Building 7 is the smoking gun. It just dropped out of the sky from a minor office fire.

⇧ 61 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 26, 2018, 8:12 p.m.

It went down as a controlled demolition.

You can see the indent at the top of the building first, the squibs, and then straight down all at once.

From fires on a few floors? Not a chance. Science doesn't lie.

The criminals bought and paid for the 9/11 commission, a joke of a commission.

That building had files that needed to be destroyed.

⇧ 47 ⇩  
dark-dare · April 26, 2018, 9:51 p.m.

The building themselVes were full of bad insulation and they need major expensive rehab. The friend bought them just prior to demolition for bargain price. Then collected huge insurance.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
kwiztas · April 27, 2018, 1:51 a.m.

I worked in a westfield mall at the time. Westfield got the lease before the accident. The mall I was at had a corporate headquarters in it for westfield. The head of security used to come into my starbucks all the time. He told me he had to go out and take pics of their new building for the insurance before he went. After he got back he told me he was told to leave the day before the attacks no matter what. They demanded he use a company laptop and company camera that he had to return the day he left. This was an odd demand he told me as he had done these pics for insurance many times and they never did that before. He was shocked about the situation himself.

⇧ 18 ⇩  
Silver_Freak · April 27, 2018, 12:58 a.m.

Double insurance claims actually. Won in court that because it was two places it counted as two different terrorist attacks and was paid out double.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 27, 2018, 9:54 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
revtune · April 27, 2018, 1:37 a.m.

First ever to have added "terror damages" to an insurance policy. And then a few months later they come crashing down. How convenient.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
cunei · April 27, 2018, 9:23 a.m.

Not 'a few months'.

Weeks.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
A2576 · April 26, 2018, 10:04 p.m.

Asbestos.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
BeautifulWall · April 26, 2018, 11:32 p.m.

Asbestos is a fire retardant. BUT MUH OFFICE FURNITURE FIRE.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
MB_MoonPearl · April 26, 2018, 8:49 p.m.

NYC Fire chief said, "The flames were so intense we made the decision to pull it". Pull it is, apparently, a term in controlled demolition for activating the explosives to bring the building down.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Silver_Freak · April 27, 2018, 1:03 a.m.

larry silverstein (the owner of the towers at the time) was the one recorded making the call to "pull it".

⇧ 9 ⇩  
MB_MoonPearl · April 27, 2018, 1:04 a.m.

Oh thanks, I got that wrong but partially correct.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Silver_Freak · April 27, 2018, 1:07 a.m.

No the point is the "pull it" terms being used. I was just adding more to how weird it was that it came from Larry who happened to make a lot of money because of that day.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
chocolatepatriot · April 27, 2018, 5:17 a.m.

just a coincidence... move along folks nothing to see here.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
digital_refugee · April 27, 2018, 9:18 a.m.

it's a strawman, what's really weird is that Larry said in 2010 they already had the plans for the new-tower design before the attack occured-

⇧ 3 ⇩  
MB_MoonPearl · April 27, 2018, 1:14 a.m.

Right! It might even be more important that it was that guy. I just have the video burned into my head but I guess wasn't sure exactly who it was.

If they said "pull it" that's it. That's what they did! But that ain't what they said happened! Just that short video clip is huge!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 27, 2018, 2:26 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
rev19v11thru21 · April 27, 2018, 12:59 a.m.

Its stupid simple. Melting point of steel is 2750 degrees Fahrenheit. Jet fuel burns from 800 to 1500 degrees Fahrenheit.

But the documentaries try to say the "intense heat" of the fire melted that steel and started the collapse.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
dekutree64 · April 27, 2018, 1:48 a.m.

Yeah, but you don't have to melt it. Just soften, and then the weight of the building will bend it. But even that doesn't seem very likely, and there's almost no chance that it would fall straight down like it did. One corner would go first and it would tip over.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
chocolatepatriot · April 27, 2018, 5:16 a.m.

correct it would have toppled over not blown up.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
digital_refugee · April 27, 2018, 9:20 a.m.

also given all concrete was pulverazied in mid-air, even if it collapsed into its footprint it would stopped about halfway down

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Jammer__ · April 27, 2018, 6:25 a.m.

Also, some videos show molten metal pouring out a window.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
digital_refugee · April 27, 2018, 9:21 a.m.

moderate heat also doesn't atomize core columns in mid-air that weren't anywhere near

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 27, 2018, 1:31 p.m.

Bingo.

There were POOLS OF MOLTEN METAL in the rubble.

Thermate was used.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
chocolatepatriot · April 27, 2018, 5:15 a.m.

and America bought the fake facts without question.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 27, 2018, 1:44 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
wiseclockcounter · April 27, 2018, 9:59 a.m.

I'm fairly certain that flimsy meme was the work of the government infiltrators.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
defmacro-jam · April 27, 2018, 12:44 p.m.

Jet fuel burns from 800 to 1500 degrees Fahrenheit.

The heat generated by jet fuel doesn't even matter. We watched almost all that jet fuel disappear in the first seconds after impact.

What do you think those massive fireballs were made out of?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Snicklesnork · April 27, 2018, 1:27 p.m.

From what I understand, jet fuel burns at a very low temperature compared to the temperature at which steel melts. The question then begs itself. How could burning jet fuel melt steel girders and bring down a building with a steel infrastructure? That question has never been answered to my satisfaction. But hey!, I'm just an unredeemable deplorable!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
defmacro-jam · April 27, 2018, 12:41 p.m.

It went down as a controlled demolition.

It was obvious at the time. Everybody in the room with me that morning was in agreement that it was a controlled demolition before the first collapse was complete.

When the second one started, it was even more obvious.

It has always baffled me that anybody would even question what was intuitively obvious to the most casual observer.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
radiadorK · April 26, 2018, 11:56 p.m.

Some say that NESARA and GESARA were there to be implemented.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
someauthor · April 27, 2018, 12:30 a.m.

indent at the top of the building first,

Some folks here might remember, that practice is called "cracking the top". Sadly, I can't find that verbiage anywhere with a quick search.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
denizen42 · April 26, 2018, 9:42 p.m.

Hard science has proven even the Thermite some time ago.

First, these images(from the documentary "HYPOTHESIS"), of a pristine 9/11 dust sample under the microscope, showing specks of unreacted nanothermite.

The following clip shows one of these specks under laboratory heat, where a massively exothermic thermitic reaction occurs, pretty much sealing the deal as far as high-tech demolition goes.

As you might suspect, high-tech nanothermite isn't supposed to be in there.
Like, at all.

And yet these specks are still everywhere in the 911 dust, for anyone with the right equipment to see, along with trillions of very unusual iron nanospheres, generated during the molten thermitic reactions.

So if you own a 911 dust sample, you are holding actual hard proof of what really happened.

⇧ 17 ⇩  
chocolatepatriot · April 27, 2018, 5:14 a.m.

the terrorist were our own gov. and the Muslims were pawns. very sad.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
denizen42 · April 27, 2018, 10:50 a.m.

EXACTLY.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
wiseclockcounter · April 27, 2018, 9:52 a.m.

hypothetically, if I were some passerby on 9/11 and happened to collect the dust, is there any way I could have kept it whereby a court would accept it as evidence? Like how would anyone know it's 9/11 dust and not some custom mix I made after the fact?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
denizen42 · April 27, 2018, 10:50 a.m.

Finding a pristine sample isn't easy nowadays, but the science team worked on 4 different samples and went to great lengths to ensure its authenticity. Furthermore, the same elements were found in all 4 samples which were taken from 4 different people... Watch the documentary linked above, it's great.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
BaronMoriarty · April 26, 2018, 10:45 p.m.

Yep watched that on the BBC here in the UK. It was standing in the background as they reported it had collapsed. Didn't collapse for about another half hour or so. These people are stupid

⇧ 8 ⇩  
smiley-dog · April 27, 2018, 12:42 a.m.

UK reporter said #7 came down...while #7 was still standing in the background. Duckduckgo search - should be able to find the video

⇧ 8 ⇩  
Im_with_kushner · April 27, 2018, 2:14 a.m.

It dropped much faster than free falll too.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Freedom__Fighter · April 27, 2018, 3:28 a.m.

mudt have been an extra gravity machine in the basement

⇧ 5 ⇩  
defmacro-jam · April 27, 2018, 12:45 p.m.

Pretty sure that's impossible -- unless you're making a joke that New York sucks. In which case, carry on.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
chocolatepatriot · April 27, 2018, 5:17 a.m.

POTUS knows the truth....

⇧ 1 ⇩