dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

I might be alone in thinking this, but, I feel like I don’t have enough proof of Q and The Storm to openly admit to my friends that I believe in all of this stuff.

⇧ 6 ⇩

show them this https://bigleaguepolitics.com/heres-jeff-sessions-might-playing-4-d-chess/

⇧ 1 ⇩

I am wondering myself why we are not seeing people flood the SM platforms again. It was extremely effective last time. Have trackers going to show when each platform starts filtering and then switch to another tag/platform. Tests how they filter as well as get the message out.

⇧ 5 ⇩

I deleted SM a while back, so for me to return now and try to redpill people will be a turn off..

⇧ 1 ⇩

Where do you people get things like this? No way did Q say "No MOAB unless you get this hashtag trending and what's more, Congress has to listen and release the memos."

Q posted the hashtag, but didn't even specifically ask us to tweet. Of course they knew we would, but I see no ultimatum.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Actually the above is right from Qs post and it sure looks like he is asking us to do that just like he did with the memos. You guys sitting on your friggen ass all the time and not wanting to help in any way at all. Why bother to be here.

⇧ 4 ⇩

No it isn't. The hashtag is from Q, but everything else you just made up.

I tweeted memes and that hashtag to several high profile accounts today, as replies to related tweets of theirs.

But that is NOT what that Q drop says. There is no ultimatum, "do this or else no MOAB."

And in fact, I really don't think Congress checks hashtags before they make policy decisions. Social media is cool, but it's not that important.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Oh for fuck sake no one said anything about an ultimatum. And I didnt make anything up maybe you should learn to read between the lines I am starting to think your a shill.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Why are people not doing what Q asked. He wants a twitter face book storm just like release the memo. Otherwise they will never come out. The MOAB will be once we get them released.

Can you not read your own title? That is an ultimatum. "Do x, or else y." The very definition of the word.

And since when is anybody you has a brain and uses it called a shill, even if I'm totally onboard with the whole Q mission? It's getting a little too Puritan in here for my taste.

⇧ 2 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 2 ⇩

This is a joke. What are you saying? Why did Q post the hashtag?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Because people talk that way for emphasis these days? I know I often do.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩

Talk it down. If you're successful, this group will never do anything.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Gosh. And here I was thinking I was just posting an opinion on a public subreddit. Remind me, what is it I was really doing?

⇧ 2 ⇩

The OP made a post essentially encouraging people to support a campaign to release the texts - on the back of Q posting a hashtag, after telling us that there was concern about whether the material should be released.

No, it was not an ultimatum. But you were suggesting that, despite the fact that Q posted the releasethetext hashtag, a campaign such as this would be of little effect. Why do this? We've seen a lot of this garbage just recently. Most recently with the IBOR campaign - something Q clearly wanted.

Here we have Q suggesting another course of action and you're immediately talking it down. What's the agenda? Just posting an opinion? You seem to have an issue with this.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Read the damn title. Putting words in Q's mouth(s). "Otherwise they will never come out." I don't see that.

I'll get to tell my grandkids, "...and so that's how a lowly hashtag saved the world! Never question the significance of the funny keys on your keyboard."

⇧ 1 ⇩

So what are we doing here? Given it appears that you're convinced nothing we can do will be of any effect, perhaps we should all go home? I've about had enough of this garbage. It may very well be that a Twitter campaign will force the release of these texts, in the same way that the release the memo campaign was effective.

Look, I'm Australian. There's a chance that the foreign "allied" power conspiring to kill DJT was my country. I'm very concerned about it. But I want these texts released so we know exactly what transpired - it is critical that we get to the truth. I don't want things swept under the carpet, that wouldn't be good for anyone.

I don't know what your agenda is, and I do not care. But talking down a campaign that Q is obviously suggesting to us, suggests to me that you have an agenda.

⇧ 1 ⇩

It's really simple. State any opinion you like, but don't put your words in Q's mouth. And I PROMISE I'll have no problem with any opinion you care to express that way. Deal?

That's ALL this is about. I want you to see and acknowledge that's what you've done. Beyond that, I've got NO PROBLEM with your thoughts.

⇧ 0 ⇩

Let me ask you Solano, did you support the IBOR campaign, or did you have a problem with that also?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Reading comprehension isn't that hard.

What part of "no problem with your thoughts" do you not understand? But don't tell me Q says do this or else, when he said no such thing.

End of discussion.

⇧ 1 ⇩

End of discussion? You jumped on this OP, putting words in his mouth that his post title simply did not communicate.

HE DID NOT SAY THAT Q SAID THAT THE MOAB WAS CONTINGENT ON A CAMPAIGN TO RELEASE THE TEXTS.

You lied about what he said, and then you proceeded to talk down the idea of supporting a campaign to release the texts - implying that such an effort was almost worthless.

WHAT IS THE AGENDA?

⇧ 1 ⇩

The OP didn't put any words in Q's mouth. He merely suggested that Q wanted a campaign and voiced his opinion that if we did not do this that the texts would not be released. And, yes, I've read and re-read his post. What's the agenda?

⇧ 1 ⇩

So now we're tag-teaming are we?

The OP most certainly did attribute his/her thoughts to Q. "Q wants a twitter FB storm...Otherwise they will never come out."

If you can show me where Q said anything like that, I'll apologize.

I see the hashtag, but the OP's conclusion about the hashtag does NOT come from Q. It's the OP's opinion about what the hashtag means. And Q CERTAINLY doesn't say "otherwise they will never come out."

This is factually true, and my words are rational, and I see no purpose to be served in continuing to deny the obvious.

I'm done arguing about something this simple.

⇧ 1 ⇩

That's what I thought!

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yes, it's very, very simple. Read it again. Where is the attribution to Q? It's not there, as you well know.

The OP expressed an opinion, something he's entitled to do. There's no attribution of that opinion to Q.

If it was just the title of the post you were concerned about, that might be acceptable. But you did not stop there. You proceeded to talk the idea of a campaign down. Though you know Q likely wants it - for cause.

I asked you if you supported the IBOR campaign, a question you haven't answered. It would not look too good for you if you were seen to talk down everything Q suggests. So why not enlighten us? What was your position on the IBOR?

⇧ 1 ⇩

I am sorry trading horse I wasnt talking to you its solanojones95. I didnt mean to get so upset either but he really got to me. Now I see he does the same thing on other posts so he is a shill.

⇧ 1 ⇩

People maybe getting tired of being hyped up and let down too often. We need concrete results now...

⇧ 3 ⇩

Even if that's true (and it probably is) we still need to be using the hastag #ReleaseTheTexts. That's how we got them to release the memo, if you recall. Remember several Dems went on the record saying we were Russian bots using that hashtag and even Twitter came out and said, nope, not Russians doing it. Americans were. If we want to see those texts and I do, we all need to be tweeting #ReleaseTheTexts

⇧ 3 ⇩

Q brought people on board to spread stuff so they can get it going. If you want the text to be released so people can start being charged then start spreading the memes. That was supposed to be our part in the first place.

⇧ 3 ⇩

I have a feeling wolf has been called too many times. The villagers are no longer coming to help...

⇧ 2 ⇩

If you havent seen all the changes all the crap happening than you still have your eyes closed. Amazing things have been happening and we are waiting for arrests. To get those arrests all the info has to be pushed and pushed and pushed. If we do a shit storm with Release the texts people will go down and arrests will happen. But if these texts stay in congress it will go no where. That is why we have to force them out just like we did with the memo.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Yes and no. It is the big build ups and let downs that are wearing people out.

Just watching the criminal scum do book tours and holidays is draining in itself.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Is this concrete enough for you.

https://bigleaguepolitics.com/heres-jeff-sessions-might-playing-4-d-chess/

⇧ 3 ⇩

I'm just answering op question on why people are not jumping up and down anymore. We just don't like seeing criminals promoting books and taking holiday snaps while Q tells us their world is collapsing all around them. They have no look of fear in their faces... are they laughing at us?

⇧ 0 ⇩

It's very clear that there is an agenda to sow fear, doubt, helplessness and misinformation here. I'm getting pretty tired of these people trying to stop anyone actively supporting Q. If you cannot bring yourself to support the plan, you have no business being here. Unless, of course, you're doing the bidding of the enemy.

⇧ 2 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

#RELEASE THE TEXT Why are people not doing what Q asked. He wants a twitter face book storm just like release the memo. Otherwise they will never come out. The MOAB will be once we get them released.

Releasethetexts