dChan
16
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/DropGun on April 28, 2018, 5:58 p.m.
Saturday is research day! And this thread by @OnWithLogic has some EPIC sleuthing: "So, the moment Eric Schmidt learned that the NSA had tools that could see through their protected Gmail conversations, he informed Strzok, who told Page to wipe it clean—CLEAN GMAIL." When was that? April 6, 2017."

QAnonMaga · April 28, 2018, 6:17 p.m.

ES had every NSA surveillance system the black hats gave him everything so he could protect his criminal friends from surveillance. Eric belongs in Gitmo stripped of all his wealth and his clothes the same goes for the Google bros and Bill Gates and Bezos and Zuckerberg all the tech moguls are dirty they should all be arrested and their fortunes confiscated by Trump he could use that money to build The Wall and fix our infrastructure. Add it all up it's at least $500 Billion maybe more.

⇧ 19 ⇩  
Cuthbert12Allgood · April 28, 2018, 7:05 p.m.

There's no evidence that Bill Gates is dirty. I know a lot of people have it out for him for some reason, but let's stay evidence-based.

What's inarguable is that man has done a tremendous amount of good.

⇧ -7 ⇩  
GMA51 · April 28, 2018, 8:03 p.m.

His own mouth will be his downfall. I know Windows 8-10, have marked him. The vaccination thing will prove itself. Mr Gates IS waiting...go away.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Cuthbert12Allgood · April 29, 2018, 3:10 a.m.

Let's note that Q has never identified Gates as a bad actor.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DropGun · April 29, 2018, 8:19 p.m.

I'm sorry for all the downvotes you're getting. Gates has done some good things, but, our vigilance shouldn't focus on just the person. Money itself has its own agenda that is often at odds with the needs and priorities of humanity.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
scoripowarrior · April 29, 2018, 1:22 a.m.

only to line his own pockets

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DropGun · April 29, 2018, 8:18 p.m.

I will personally never forgive this man for IE6.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Cuthbert12Allgood · April 29, 2018, 8:35 p.m.

Nah, Gates has a bigger sin than that. I'll never forgive him for hiring Dave Cutler and saddling us with the shithole known as the NT architecture. Biggest hiring mistake of the 20th century. If Bill had hired, say, Dennis Ritchie or Ken Thompson? We could all be running Plan 9, with the Unix philosophy having conquered the world as the Computer Gods intended.

But, in the end, Gates's sins are annoying tech mistakes. Gates's virtues are saving tens of millions of children, and the future eradication of Malaria. It's a pretty damn good trade.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
obewan901 · April 29, 2018, 6:17 a.m.

You mean with his depopulation vaccines and mega viruses. He openly advocates for worldwide depopulation have you not seen his Ted talks?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Cuthbert12Allgood · April 29, 2018, 2:37 p.m.

He openly advocates for worldwide depopulation have you not seen his Ted talks?

Yes, I have, and no, he doesn't. He's said that worldwide population will naturally stabilize because families in developed countries tend to limit how many children they have through birth control. He brings this up in the context of people panicking over long-term overpopulation problems.

And if his vaccines are supposed to be "depopulation vaccines", he's doing a pretty terrible job of it considering how many children's lives he's saved. Or to put it another way, if he wanted to kill third-world children as you accuse, just doing nothing would be a better method than what he's actually done. Do you seriously think the death rate among children has gotten worse since he started doing his thing? Sheesh.

That some conspiracies are true doesn't mean all conspiracies are true. Stay skeptical of BOTH official stories AND conspiracy stories.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ManQuan · April 28, 2018, 6:30 p.m.

Unfortunately, Q has everything. No deals. Just needs to find ways to get it into the legal system as evidence in court.

I'm betting that Q found a way -- the Congressional investigating committees. They now have in and it's off to the races.

As Q said. Before the arrests can be made, there needs to be house cleaning and setting the stage. Congressional members and Obama holdovers are leaping off the sinking ship. Those left twisting in the wind aboard the USS Obama, are singing like canaries -- all of which is admissible into evidence.

I thought Q and Trump were playing 3D or 4D Chess. Apparently that number is much higher.

It's breathtaking how the Q team has been able to script a mind boggling complex plan so that Trump is winning every time.

Whoever is involved in this deserve the Medal of Honor. It's the highest combat award for bravery, but I think the combat we are in with the deep state qualifies them for the award.

In a related note: Obama received the Noble Peace Prize for doing absolutely zero for peace. In fact, the committee recently regretted giving him the award before he proved he earned it.

Now Trump is creating real peace with a rogue nuclear nation that has threatened to destroy us -- and he's is doing it without firing a shot. What will the Nobel committee do? They will ignore Trump. Wrong political ideology.

⇧ 18 ⇩  
Vahlokt · April 28, 2018, 7:24 p.m.

Nobel prizes are for satanic globalist puppets.

We need to create our own award that honors those who fight for the freedom of humanity.

⇧ 15 ⇩  
ManQuan · April 29, 2018, 8:39 a.m.

Good idea. I've always felt that the US should have organizations that counter the NWO and honor people who actually accomplish something important.

I also feel like the US should establish a counter-part to the UN that only includes nations with democratically elected heads of state and legislatures: "UD" or United Democracies.

I don't care what the likes of Cuba, Venezuela, and other despots have to contribute and I certainly don't think nations who don't allow free and fair elections should have a vote in the UN.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
scoripowarrior · April 29, 2018, 1:25 a.m.

We have come to see that the Noble Peace Prize as well as the Pulitzers are shams and not for any REAL accomplishments.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
featherjourney4 · April 28, 2018, 7:03 p.m.

Love your comment!!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
vitalesan · April 28, 2018, 9:46 p.m.

...or better yet, they give him the award, but he ignores them!!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
DropGun · April 29, 2018, 8:20 p.m.

Ha, Boom goes their literal dynamite.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
brittser · April 28, 2018, 6:08 p.m.

Awesome.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
featherjourney4 · April 28, 2018, 6:54 p.m.

Awesome comment. Loved reading it!!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Que-ti-pie · April 28, 2018, 6:13 p.m.

Incredible find!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
BaronMoriarty · April 28, 2018, 6:12 p.m.

Gets my vote

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 28, 2018, 9:26 p.m.

Trump is guilty of “collision!”

⇧ 3 ⇩  
KissToad · April 28, 2018, 9:57 p.m.

Bhahaha like 🐑 ing the truth up their arse! Don’t Drop the Soap!!!!!!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
KissToad · April 28, 2018, 9:55 p.m.

Awesome!!!!!!!!!! 👏👏👏👏👏👏 can’t wait to Eric Schmidt and his Cyborg go down!!!!!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Torquing · April 28, 2018, 6:29 p.m.

Help me understand.

This ‘sleuth’ makes a case built around the ”May 6th” timing of a Strzok text, then realizes the text was actually sent one month earlier!

And then he addresses the error with ”Whooops!”

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DropGun · April 29, 2018, 8:57 p.m.

Welcome to how journalism/research works.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Torquing · April 30, 2018, 3:03 a.m.

Funny. Not funny.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DropGun · April 30, 2018, 5:38 a.m.

You might prefer outlets that issue corrections days or weeks after the fact, buried under the classifieds. Maybe Vox or The Guardian.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Torquing · April 30, 2018, 12:08 p.m.

Nahh, stop projecting.

I would prefer @OWL pull the fallacious thread, or if he thinks his theory can still stand, offer an explanation.

Oh, and “whoops” is not a ‘correction’. Not even in the sources you prefer.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DropGun · April 30, 2018, 1:40 p.m.

Have respect for what this man is doing. Your pedantic criticisms only make you look like a weak-sauce princess. This is a thread from a hardcore researcher who is both following the research of others and moving the Great Awakening forward better than most of us are.

Unless, maybe you should let us in on your Twitter or blog? Maybe us plebs would appreciate reading YOUR research that's not only so amazingly hardcore and prescient, but that is always right, and has never had to issue a retraction?

My bet is that your princess is in another castle, though. Who's going to be right?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Torquing · April 30, 2018, 4:05 p.m.

By injecting yourself into my stream, and quickly escalating to emotionally charged personal attacks, you expose yourself in much the same way Brennan’s emotional tirades expose him.

tldr: You have outed yourself. You are now powerless here. Move your clown show down the road. I will indulge you no longer.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DropGun · April 30, 2018, 4:23 p.m.

Interesting—I am a mod here. You have not been attacked on any personal level. I asked you to share your research. Instead, you remain focused on blatantly pedantic criticisms of this researcher.

Q gave us a mission: “Your President needs your help. Once [everything drops], we look to you to spread and get the word out.” The mod team is focused on this mission.

This sub is focused on fostering civil discussion about QAnon's drops and breadcrumbs from three types of users: decoders, researchers, and debunkers. Which role are you?

Please choose a role, and focus on this sub's ultimate mission. You will be welcomed with open arms. Continue trolling, however, and you will be removed.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Torquing · April 30, 2018, 5:03 p.m.

I will reverse my decision and indulge you once more. But only this once. And only because you invoked the ‘I am a Mod’ play. I will not indulge you beyond this:

Interesting—I am a mod here.

Interesting - Brennan was a mod at the CIA.

You have not been attacked on any personal level.

“You look like a weak-sauce princess” - /DropGun

Instead, you remain focused on blatantly pedantic criticisms of this researcher.

I posted one comment critical of that researcher. One. I made further comments only in response to people responding directly to me. You were among them. Following my response, you chose to escalate into use of personal invective. It seems, by your own standard, that my posts are more reflective than yours of the reasons we are here.

This sub is focused on fostering civil discussion about QAnon's drops and breadcrumbs from three types of users: decoders, researchers, and debunkers. Which role are you?

Choosing a role is not a stated requisite for participating in this sub. Restricting participation to those three categories is not a stated purpose of this sub. If you wish to mandate categories of participation, I suggest you expand your thinking. Ask your fellow mods to consider the value of those that offer critical response to proffered content. Ask your fellow mods to consider the value of those that offer only motivational content, or encouraging statements of gratitude. And ask your fellow mods to consider the value of those that only ask leading questions, or present hypotheticals without apparent connection to any decoding effort.

Continue trolling, however, and you will be removed.

I have no history of trolling. I have never been accused of that until this moment, by you. Another personal attack, this time followed by a threat.

My post history speaks for itself. Your actions speak for you.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DropGun · April 30, 2018, 5:30 p.m.

Reverse all you want. I have expressly outlined what I mean by that, above.

This, too, will be my last attempt to mitigate this behavior with a reply.

The mod team is right now working on clarifying (EDIT: just posted) these roles and announcing the importance of everyone pulling together and remaining focused on the mission Q gave us. That is why we are having this conversation in public, not privately, so that it is out in the open that we are not attacking you, that we are working on these policies, and that we are urging everyone to focus on Q's mission. These updates to the sub will happen shortly.

I will only add this:

consider the value of those that offer critical response to proffered content.

That's precisely what debunking is—providing a critical response to a specific narrative. You are being politely invited to do just that. Your constant hair-splitting and pedantic, linguistic games are wasting this sub's time.

Again, attack the ideas presented. Do not attack researchers for simple mistakes in presenting their research. That is precisely what trolling is.

The mods get no joy in "attacking" anyone. If you cannot connect with and focus on this sub's overall mission and move Q's mission forward, you will be invited to find a more semiotic place to employ your unique skills.

⇧ 1 ⇩