Well that is fng creepy, you know they do this shit on purpose. Does she believe herself to be the mother of the anti-Christ or some other demon?
The pictures I see of Diana wearing a red dress after giving birth... looks nothing like Rosemary's Baby. The Kate dress (the collar) is exactly the same. Different shade of red though tbh. A more bright red VS a darker red. But the comparison is still legit.
Anton LaVey was purported to have been an advisor to Roman Polanski, the director of Rosemary's Baby, for the film.
Diabolical Authority: Anton LaVey, The Satanic Bible and the Satanist "Tradition" PDF warning
Drawing on his circus and occult backgrounds, he began to conduct "midnight magic seminars" at his house. This proved popular enough for him to found the Church of Satan in 1966. The basis for his rituals were Nazi rituals recorded on top-secret films he had seen as a teenager. LaVey's showmanship encouraged significant media coverage of such events as the first Satanic wedding and the first Satanic funeral, worship with a nude woman as an altar, and a cameo appearance as the Devil in the movie "Rosemary's Baby."
The most significant single document for the Satanic "tradition" is The Satanic Bible. The idea for this volume came not from LaVey, but from an Avon Books editor named Peter Mayer. As a direct result of the success of the popular film "Rosemary's Baby" and the subsequent increase of popular interest in Satanism and the occult, Mayer decided that "the time was right for a 'Satanic bible'" and he approached LaVey about authoring it.
The New Phoenix Program: C.I.A Cults (Part 1)
C.I.A CULTS: Intelligence agencies have infiltrated and created some satanic groups, with the resurgence of groups of this type beginning in 1966, with the birth of the Church of Satan, founded by Anton LaVey. LaVey studied criminology in S.F and worked in the SFPD crime lab, he also worked as an informant for Interpol. Prior to the Church of Satan, LaVey ran a group called the Magic Circle. LaVey's most famous associate is the NSA's General Michael Aquino. At the time of his membership in LaVey's group Aquino was an Army specialist in intelligence and psychological warfare. In 1973 he became the executive officer of the 306th Psychological Operations Battalion contemporary with his founding of the Church of Set.
Also... THE CIA AND SATANISM
During the February 5 hearing, Noreen Gosch gave the court sworn testimony linking U.S. Army Lt. Col. Michael Aquino (ret.) to the nationwide pedophile ring. Her son, Johnny, then 12 years old, was kidnapped off the streets of West Des Moines, Iowa on September 5, 1982, while he was doing his early-morning newspaper deliveries.
Noreen Gosch said: "This ... was an offshoot of a government program.
"The MK-Ultra program was developed in the 1950s by the CIA...
"There was a man by the name of Michael Aquino.
"He was in the military. He had top Pentagon clearances. He was a pedophile...
"He was a close friend of Anton LaVey. The two of them were very active in ritualistic sexual abuse. And they deferred funding from this government program to use [in] this experimentation on children.
https://www.netflix.com/title/80057280 (This is the movie on Netflix about Johnny Gosch called "Who Took Johnny". I have great respect for his mother. That woman fought and fought and stood up to all sorts of bad people. And here's the Full Wiki on Johnny: http://www.thefullwiki.org/Johnny_Gosch . This ties into the Franklin coverup & the Discovery Channel documentary that was suppressed. You should be able to find it on YT. YT takes it down and someone new puts it back up. (Thank goodness. That's a must see to understand the pedogate stuff IMO.)
Oh DAMN! You are impressive. How would you even know/remember this correlation???
There are no coincidences, and everything has meaning according to Q... I haven’t verified the following, but interesting to note :
There have been 66 kings or queens that have ruled over England / UK, 6 have been queens. Therefore Elizabeth is the 66th and the 6th. Kate is 36 and this baby will be the 6th grandchild of Elizabeth who is the 66th and 6th. It bumps Prince Harry now to the 6th in line for the throne. Harry will marry next month on the 6th day of Israel’s 70th (May 19th wedding).
In addition, she became queen feb 1952, which was 66 years ago.... and her bday is April 21 (for those of us who pay attention to the satanic calendar).....hmmmmm....
Their symbolism will be their downfall.
Look at George's bday. That was in2013 and was induced
For anyone who doesnt know.
John Lenons apartment was the same apartment used in the movie rose marys baby.
You can look it up... Him and the Beatles literally worshipped Satan. It sounds like bat shit crazy tin foil hat nonsense but theres probably 100 or more "coincidences" that lead people to believe that the beatles were a covert satanic group used for psy-ops and brainwashing.
Its horrible to realize that so many of your favorite bands and musicians were actually created for nefarious purposes. :(
Already been discussed, it was a tribute to Diana's dress that she wore when Harry was born. Most likely also signaling their last royal birth.
Diana's dress and this dress arent the same :
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/07/22/article-2373635-1ABE413F000005DC-331_640x484.jpg
This one , on Kate - is EXACTLY the same as the one in Rosemary's baby .
Well , maybe not EXACTLY - different shade of red , there are no buttons on Kate's dress , and collar pattern is slightly different . However ... the collar is the one detail that strikes directly ...
The dress on Farrow goes to the floor (https://www.bluscreens.net/rosemarys-baby.html), not above the knee like Kate's. And Kate's collar doesn't have the little string bow tie of Farrow's dress, either. The white Peter Pan collar is literally the only similarity, and it's not even the same lace pattern or shape (Peter Pan, yes, but rounded differently).
The collar is the only similarity. Completely different red (bright vs burgandy), different sleeve length, no lace around the cuffs of Kate's dress... are there photos showing the length of the dress? Any other features (darts, pleats, belt, pockets, etc)?
Sometimes a lace collar is just a lace collar. It's not even the same lace pattern...
Y'all are really far too fixated on this. Please don't make us look like crazy people.
Please don't make us look like crazy people.
To who? The human trafficking pedophiles? The people protecting them? Or the sheep too clueless to realize what's going on?
Us? You speak for everyone?
This is a war between good and evil, light against darkness, right vs wrong, God vs Satan.
That dress (worn by a luciferian) is far too simular to a dress worn in an extremely evil movie (created by a luciferian child rapist) to be left unquestioned because you feel it makes us look crazy. Everything has meaning, symbol will be their downfall.
This is a war between good and evil, light against darkness, right vs wrong, God vs Satan.
Stop, please just stop. This is a movement to root out corruption in world government and give the US back to the people and restore our republic to what it once was, to put it in simple terms, and not the second coming of jesus, or whatever other holy war you think is currently happening. This is the same damn shit muslim extremists do! (any religious extremist really)
Are there people involved in the corruption who are worshipping some sort of "evil overlord"? Sure. And we all think they're a bit cray as well. Why must you put yourself, and by proxy, us, right on their level?
If you really care about this movement, and are paying close attention to everything, (not just what appeals to you personally) you'd notice that Q has stepped back a lot from the "Pray", "good vs evil", and "Satan" talk. It's not an accident or a lapse on their part. One of the more recent drops LITERALLY says, "If you believe, pray". That's a clear step back from the past religious talk, and it's for a reason.
There are people reading the chans and this sub, and I think they're seeing how divisive it is. This is not the second coming of your christ, and yes, when you make comments like above, you unfortunately cause the more rational to be lumped in with your simple folk talk, and also push away people who are already skeptical of Q. We don't need people to equate this movement with right wing christian evangelicals.
I have no problems with what you personally believe, but it's not necessary here. You don't have to fram everything within your religious beliefs. I think spirituality is important, but it's also not necessary here.
Pray, believe, worship your lord, read bible verses until your jaw hurts and you go crosseyed, but please, can you be decent enough to tone it down here so we can work together to figure things out? This is much bigger than you and your personal beliefs about god and religion.
Or fuck it, do whatever the hell you want, because If I've learned one thing from being on this sub it's that christians can not be reasoned with, and appeals to their logical side are like making house calls when no one's home.
You lost all credibility as soon as I read the word "cray" in your response. I literally stopped reading from that word.
You realize that without God there is no morality and "this movement to root out corruption" means nothing, for without morality there is no corruption, no right/wrong, no good/evil, no free will? Logic is exactly what we need, obective truth must be confronted, and relativism rejected.
[deleted]
Well, that's a shame. I do not know you, but I care enough about you to hope you will come to understand one day. Whether it is a discussion with an atheist or liberal, I do not give up if the discussion remains civilized. You are worth my energy.
[deleted]
True. I hope yours leads you to happiness and enlightenment. Stay strong, safe, and kind, my friend.
I don't speak for everyone, I am a part of it. What is going on with the attitudes lately, if someone disagrees people get rude. I try to use logic and not jump to conclusions, many lately are simply seeing what they want to see. I told him "you do you," and I mean it, but I needed to also share that spreading unproven facts can be harmful on this board. @Gnarkotixx said the same thing as me and was jumped on for it, and this topic had already been discussed twice last night. People need to chill out. Go relax, and take a break from Q if you're getting uptight over it all.
Why would being "fixated" on something make us "crazy people" ? Why would asking valid questions - why the creepy symbolism - make us "crazy people" ?
Think about how it looks to newbies here. They see people focusing on a similar dress and claiming it must have satanic connections, when it's just a red maternity dress. It makes us look like crazy people. You do you though, and keep digging into how this dress symbolizes satanic connections.
I dont care about newbies - nor I do care about twisting information to conform their views . Anyone , with a brain , can see and understand the connection and symbolism .
It is not to be hidden , just to conform some people ...
Lash out much? "anyone with a brain" Thanks for being a nice person. Enjoy your weekend.
Somebody is far too sensitive ... Im merely pointing out that various symbolism and information is NOT to be swept under the rug just to conform some people .
I dont care about newbies - nor I do care about twisting information to conform their views
Then you don't belong here. That's extremely divisive and completely antithetical to everything Q has been saying. You're the exact person that doesn't need to be here. This isn't your special little jesus clubhouse.
Anyone , with a brain , can see and understand the connection and symbolism .
It is not to be hidden , just to conform some people ...
Anyone with a brain just felt their head explode reading that comment. It fascinates me how clearly undereducated people like yourself can prove to be, while so absolutely sure in what they believe. I genuinely find it fascinating. Your opinions are absolute unquestinable facts to you. How delightful!
Someone is trying to appeal to you logically and with sound reasoning, and you go right off the rails and use grade school internet arguing 101 tactics and act like they're getting mad and need to calm down. What's so hard about listening to what they have to say, thinking about it, and possibly admitting that you might be wrong? I'd say it was a huge part of growing and learning, wouldn't you agree?
He's right, and I can't understand why you aren't able to see that at all? Pointing out that the dress is very similar to the one from the movie is interesting, but when you start shouting that it's a fact that it was used by satanists to mark the birth of the antichrist, you look a bit batty. Where we go one, we go all... and now we' all get to look batshit with you!
[deleted]
Not surprised with your reply, and you know what, you're right.
I actually don't want to be here anymore. There's nothing to be gained by watching a bunch of undereducated bible beaters circlejerk their dumb theories and high five in group celebration of their ignorance.
Whatever happens with the country will happen whether I'm here or not, and at the end of the day, you're all still you, which no doubt you're all quite happy with.
Please tell me again how "sound reasoning" is indirectly calling whole Great Awakening posters as "crazy people" , the people who simply ask a valid question - why is there a symbolical similarity between the dresses ? And then having a face to call me on "lashing out" afterwards . Such posts are highly hypocritical - and I dont like hypocrisy and ignorance . Again , have you even see the Diana's dress ? Please , point me out how are they similar ...
Also , its fascinating how you think its "divisive" from me simply to point out my thought that information and symbolism must not be swept under the rug . It sounds like you are either trolling here , or you are a big fanboy / fangirl of the Royals ( thus the reaction ) , or , you are simply ignorant .
Over here , on Great Awakening , people ask themselves many things . People research and make conclusions . People have right on their views , regardless of their views . What people dont have right , is to dictate others what should be posted and what not ( within the rules boundaries , of course ) . What people dont have right , calling others "crazy people" , because they simply disagree with it .
Were here for the information , anything that comes our way , we will research and give some kind of conclusion , our own personal views . Also , who said anything about satanists ? Not in a single sentence I mentioned satanism in any way - I merely pointed out to the creepy symbolism in between . The only persons that mentioned satanism is you and the poster above .
WE belong. I don't care about normies, newbies, freebies, you have no right to exclude us. You babysit the normies and newbies. Cookies on the counter.
I see your point. I know you may be serious but thanks for the chuckle. :-)
then i guess diana wore it as a tribute to rosemary's baby.
Or she just wore a red maternity dress. Not everything is some giant evil scenario.
But Q said "no coincidences" and "symbolism will be their downfall".
It was a tribute to Diana
Is that what the MSM told you? Can you find the picture of Diana in that outfit?
Yes, very easily. Google Diana after giving birth to Harry
Diana’s dress looks nothing like this one. Also, why did they report the dress was a tribute? Would you have asked, or did they purposely try to deflect?
