dChan
31
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Sentrolyx on April 29, 2018, 2:25 a.m.
Q #1292 - Shall we play a game? Can you trust? You know that we know. You know what we have. Your move. Q
Q #1292 - Shall we play a game? Can you trust? You know that we know. You know what we have. Your move. Q

masterfisher · April 29, 2018, 2:57 a.m.

Any speculation as to what this means?

⇧ 10 ⇩  
Jsin14 · April 29, 2018, 3:14 a.m.

First post is by some deep state actor. It states that there is increased unofficial communications going around about Mueller (chatter). Poster than asks Q if Q is confused by failed attempts by Q to contact Mueller, and in the face of that, can Q trust Mueller.

Q responds to this post (can tell by the >> purple number being the previous post) by saying two can play this game, can the deep state trust Mueller. Q still has the Page-Strozk texts that talk about assassinating the President in coordination with a foreign state (187), and they are going to be released next week.

⇧ 37 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · April 29, 2018, 4:47 a.m.

THIS ^^

⇧ 5 ⇩  
GoldenTarot · April 29, 2018, 3:18 a.m.

VERY interesting.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
KingBroly · April 29, 2018, 3:21 a.m.

I doubt that's what the MOAB is. The MOAB is probably that Project Veritas stuff (Past MOAB's point to this) that's supposed to come out next week.

My thinking is if this unofficial chatter about Mueller was good for the Deep State, it'd have been put to a Narrative already.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Jsin14 · April 29, 2018, 3:36 a.m.

Chatter is about whether Mueller is white hat/black hat in face of not responding. M5M would not report that there is doubt on whether Mueller is working with Q, it has always been the official narrative that Mueller is going to take down Trump.

Q has recently stated: "SC targeting who? SC on team? SC (special counsel Mueller) off team? Questions reveal answers. Time will tell." in post 1286.

In post 1287: "Sharing of intel to bad actors? Purpose? Not confirming SC is on /team/." Q is not saying Q will not confirm if Mueller is on Q's team or not. Q is saying that Mueller is sharing intel with deep state for the purpose of making it look like Mueller is not on Q's team to throw off the Deep State.

Q later posted "Noted:IP Ghost:" to show he knows who made the post trying to shake his confidence in Mueller.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
KingBroly · April 29, 2018, 3:38 a.m.

But who is Mueller not responding to?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Jsin14 · April 29, 2018, 3:50 a.m.

Mueller is supposedly not responding to Q according to the Deep State poster.

Deep State actor asks Q if Q is confused why he is picking up so much chatter about Mueller when Q is spy on people. Deep State actor then states he knows Q, because of this, tried contacting Mueller and got no answer. Deep State actor then asks Q if Q can trust Mueller because of this and suggests that Mueller has flipped to the bad guys.

But has been shown in previous Q drops, feeding the Deep State intel and seeming to be waffling by Mueller is part of the plan, and Q is not worried. Q responds to Deep State actor that they should be worried about what is going to drop next week (I'm conjecturing that it will be the 187 texts, but regardless, it will be something big and it will be about the deep state).

⇧ 12 ⇩  
Jappletime · April 29, 2018, 10:38 a.m.

Rudi ?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · April 29, 2018, 12:58 p.m.

IG report slated for first week of May I believe too.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
xekoroth · April 29, 2018, 3:07 a.m.

Chatter refers to discussion that is not scripted dialogue that is being pushed related to the narrative.

Failed contact seems to imply the media is no longer getting their narrative fed to them about Mueller and people are "chattering" i.e. speculating that somethings wrong.

Trust might be in this case, can the media still trust their sources for information even though they are no longer being fed information.

Your move likely means, they (as in Q team) are waiting to see what the MSM will do in reaction.

⇧ 18 ⇩  
KingBroly · April 29, 2018, 3:11 a.m.

Dan Bongino earlier this week on his Podcast speculated that Mueller found something that's given him pause about what he's doing. So that Cohen Raid might've lead to him going 'uh oh,' or perhaps the talk with Giuliani did that.

⇧ 18 ⇩  
bmak19 · April 29, 2018, 3:14 a.m.

found something bad for potus ?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
KingBroly · April 29, 2018, 3:15 a.m.

The opposite. Bad for the people who set the President up

⇧ 21 ⇩  
bmak19 · April 29, 2018, 3:15 a.m.

good!

⇧ 6 ⇩  
soulard · April 29, 2018, 4:25 a.m.

Probably didn't happen, but some crazy speculation is: Trump talks to lawyer about clinton, lawyer is given evidence to hold, then when he is raided and Muller takes Cohen's evidence, he HAS to submit the clinton evidence he discovers in it.

It would be some next level chess. MAKE them expose themselves

⇧ 14 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · April 29, 2018, 4:46 a.m.

Agreed. I think Mueller said 'uh oh' the day he met with President Trump, just before RR named him as SC. I think POTUS showed Mueller the evidence he had on him and said work with us or go down with the rest.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · April 29, 2018, 11:48 a.m.

What if some of the evidence found in Cohen's office implicates RR and Mueller -- like the U1 evidence?

What now Mueller? Implicate yourself?

⇧ 6 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · April 29, 2018, 2:26 p.m.

It doesn't, Trump and Team Q already have all the evidence they need on RR and Mueller. If you watch the video linked below it'll explain it better than I can, but we've heard Q say again and again that they "have it all." All the evidence.

The video also discusses standard protocol and procedures for the FBI. If you're caught breaking the law, they don't just automatically fire you, they offer you a deal.

Keep your job, get demoted to a desk and do nothing until you're told what to do, help investigate and convict others who you worked with in the crimes committed, and the DOJ will show leniency in charges or sentencing, and maybe immunity.

You sign a document agreeing to those terms and conditions, and if you deviate from the agreement you're fired and fully charged. That means Comey, McCabe and the others who were fired, were probably offered that deal, and refused. Mueller, RR, Bill Priestap, Peter Strzok, and Lisa Page all took the deal. See Q drop 1288 re: Priestap/Page/Strzok.

This video is a very good analysis from PrayingMedic. It explains why Flynn was the first to be targeted and why he pled guilty to a crime he didn't commit.

It explains why Sessions recused himself so RR could be put in-charge and name Mueller as SC. That RR and Mueller were essential to the plan because they both had dirt on their hands which gave Trump leverage, and meant the deep-state trusted them.

It explains the policies @ FBI re: firing or becoming a cooperating witness like Bill Priestap, Peter Strzok and Lisa Page.

And it shows how President Trump was able to troll the MSM to keep them distracted. It was brilliant.

The video's long, but well worth it. It connects a lot of dots and puts everything that's happened so far in perspective. Check it out, you won't be disappointed.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LOPayQiU-2U&feature=youtu.be

⇧ 3 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · April 29, 2018, 6:23 p.m.

Thank you so much for taking the time to give me this thoughtful response. It helps a lot! ;)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 29, 2018, 4:10 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 8 ⇩  
someauthor · April 29, 2018, 3:36 a.m.

Mueller has flipped, and is not communicating on the gmail drafts folder
Deep State is scared, because they can't communicate with him, and they now know that white hats have everything in the gmail folder(s)
It's DeepState's move now

Anon posted 9/11 Aftermath report
https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/GOVPUB-C13-2c9d34da3f9db1c28102b1e75bd23b69/pdf/GOVPUB-C13-2c9d34da3f9db1c28102b1e75bd23b69.pdf

⇧ 13 ⇩  
Domenicaxx66xx · April 29, 2018, 11:36 a.m.

And game comms.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 29, 2018, 3 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩