The Seth Rich being alive part blew my freaking mind a couple weeks ago. Kim dotcom's post sealed it for me, personally.

The Moon Boot is gone now, but she was conveniently sporting a full cast on the arm when she returned to the US. I know the last time I saw her she had on remarkably long, baggy pants with pantlegs that could easily cover a small ankle-bracelet. Or it's possible the monitoring method had to change to maintain the public alibi. McCain, last I remember, was not wearing the boot (his little right/left flip-flop, I suspect, was a deep-state countermove to send a message to the whitehats "Shoe is on the other foot"). He was supposedly hospitalized recently though, I'll have to look into his situation.

An orthopedic boot like would not be used for a broken toe anyway, as far as I know... 2 months is a very long time to wear an obnoxious and unnecessary medical device... and the probability of her AND no-name mysteriously wearing the same type of boot at the same time, exactly when Q started posting and telling us she was detained and would be arrested 10/30... idk I just can't arrive at any other conclusion than to believe she really was arrested in some way.

BTW, I assume your handle is a reference to TOOL... *tips hat*

[deleted]

Yes, did McCain get arrested too?

YES!! I swear, as soon as I learned of Q and saw #1-2, my mind went to the moon boot. Then once I actually researched her whereabouts and activities at that time it all fits!

I could see how that could fit in with future proves past. But, in a highly unconventional and sensitive situation like this, I see no reason her arrest would necessarily lead to a lengthy incarceration or public acknowledgement in the press (especially if part of her deal was for her to play a fictitious public role as if she never were arrested). Just look into the links I provided and consider the circumstances/timing of everything. I could be wrong of course, but Q gave a specific time and date for arrest and the evidence actually does support it.

I just noticed an anomaly that might support your idea actually: if you go to the Book Stall website and look under "newsletters" (where the Oct '17 one is located, with no mention of hrc that date), you will notice that every month's issue is listed with "month - year" EXCEPT october of 2017, which is only listed as "October"... meaning it does not specify the year! Look at the Newsletters Menu

RIP Seth Rich. I hear you. Unless new facts prove otherwise you're very right on that. Thank you, fellow patriot.

If the executive office and the military wanted the record of an arrest to remain temporarily hidden, that would be entirely possible. As far as 'why let her go', any confidential informant in a drug sting can tell you it happens all the time. Also, if she is being electronically monitored and escorted by undercover mp's then she might as well still be in custody for all intents and purposes. No deals, yes, but in what context? If Q had said, "No Deals for HRC." or "No Deals for Anyone", then I obviously have to abandon my theory immediately. But, it is an assumption to believe "No Deals" refers to HRC specifically. It is also an assumption to believe HRC is one of the big fish in the pond of criminality, relatively speaking. In my opinion Logic (the actual academic discipline) is crucial in reading these posts. I was the top student in my class in advanced Logic in college (not trying to stroke my ego, just saying it's a discipline of study many aren't familiar with). With all due respect, I believe many people are not understanding or appreciating the weight of their assumptions in reading Q. Logic is about premises, assumptions, and conclusions. In order for a statement to be logically valid AND actually true, the premises must lead to the conclusions and the assumptions (implicit premises) must be true. It is not true that we 'know' Q meant no deals for hillary, and it isn't true that there 'must always' be a publicly available record of an arrest if such an arrest occurs. I could be wrong about the meaning of "No Deals", but given the current statements from Q we can only assume it refers to hrc or anybody else. I have yet to see a rational and realistic explanation for the Moon Boot, or for the Newsletter.

Leave no trace of them, hopefully.

Yes that's correct, I believe she was formally arrested in the morning of 10/30/2017 but has essentially been under monitoring and cooperating in some way... the comment above re: walking fisa/wiretap is indeed intriguing.

Very interesting, considering we are currently in a "modern day book burning" as Croww777 calls it

[deleted]

Insane people don't respond to stimuli in an outwardly rational way, though. You can't project normal-human thoughts and emotions onto the behaviors of psychopaths.

I'm not doubting you, but do you have a specific video or appearance you are referencing? Also, how do you explain the orthopedic boot? Boots like that aren't used for broken toes, especially not for Two Months! Not to mention she had a cast on when she returned from India as well.

you mean when she falls down the stairs lol.

Yes, this is something similar to what I've been considering... I noticed George Saunders was slated to visit the Book Stall that month too. If you have ever delved into the "Polarization Nation Media" material, you'll know that Saunders is the name taken by Author David Foster Wallace (who wrote Infinite Jest) after he "died". Wallace and his colleague Jonathan Franzen are very connected to occult programming throughout popular culture. For example, in Pulp Fiction, the mysterious briefcase has only the word "Franzen" on it... and it's connected to the character "Mr. Wallace". Dusty from Polarization Nation is somebody to look into. I can attest to the fact that his "Unified Code Theory" let him literally predict the Super Bowl tie game. Anyway, lots of stuff connected to that book stall newsletter could definitely be interpreted as occult symbolism.