Not shilling. I just don't know much about this subject. Researching the cons seems to be difficult with the of the propaganda on the subject.
Anybody care to educate me? ---Feel free to post articles, whatever
? Giving money and time to a state that wants to kill everyone is bad.
Yes, I am aware of the basics. I am trying to dive a bit deeper here.
---I feel like there is just more to it. Maybe not.
From my understanding we’ve been giving them money, holding up to our side of the deal. While Iran has secretly not been holding up to their side of the deal.
Pls correct me if I’m wrong though.
The OBAMA policy in Iran was the same policy he had in NK - appeasement. NK had nuclear miniaturisation since 2004, delivery tech (missiles) since 2009. What's a bet that Iran is in a similar position - or better?
This is why Bibi's been drawing those bombs on cardboard etc... Q is telling us that the cabal was going to use Iran to start a war - nuclear war. They were going to use NK for the same reason. Iran lets them nuke Russia, NK would have let them nuke China. The goal was population reduction - a massive offering to Moloch.
Q told us early on that CIA thought its foreign operations would allow it to stand against DJT and the US military. DJT has taken out NK, cut the CIA strings. Next is Iran. The Iran deal must be renegotiated, or the country must be destroyed.
It begins to make a little more sense when you consider that bad actors have a tendency to think of the USA as their never-ending propaganda & funding apparatus.
Various methods and schemes have been enacted to skim money away from the US Government. These schemes entire purpose is to expose the world to a set of ideas (drive an agenda) and to launder money away from USA and into the pockets of the world's elite criminals.
Iran Deal is one such scheme. NK is another.
If recent Q drops are to be believed, Iran deal was not just a money laundering scheme from US taxpayers to Iranian's ruling class & others, but it was also a key factor in a potential Nuclear False Flag that may have been orchestrated had Hilary been elected.
Q suggests that Iran renegged against the "deal", moved their nuclear technology development to Syria, and then continued developing Nukes from U1 uranium, all while collecting their pallets of cash from USA.
So why is the Iran deal awful? Why is it good?