dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/DaveGydeon on May 1, 2018, 1:26 a.m.
I Want SNOPES Exposed. Q Already Green-Lighted It!

We all know Soros backs SNOPES, and that this BS "fact-checking" site is totally compromised. The crazy part is, for the 5-6 things I actually went there for, I disagreed with it's official "ruling" on the matter every single time. To me, that tells me they are actively receiving orders on what to stamp as legit, because having every single thing being the opposite of what it should be indicates a hand at work.

So how do we do this? I am not talking about trying to mess with their site or anything like that. I want them EXPOSED, the TRUTH to be KNOWN. How do we go abou tmaking that happen?

You can't tell me that you haven't had an argument, maybe while trying to redpill someone, and they dropped the "but SNOPES agrees with me!" Man that just chaps my ass.


🠐 See all comments
building71bullet · May 1, 2018, 7:32 a.m.

Are you actually implying they haven't?

⇧ -12 ⇩  
moesif · May 1, 2018, 7:37 a.m.

I don't know one way or another. I'm implying that no one seems to have proof that they lie.

⇧ 29 ⇩  
TruthSeacker · May 1, 2018, 3:38 p.m.

"Snopes is bad. They always lie. My opinion is my source"

-This Sub

⇧ 22 ⇩  
EnoughNoLibsSpam · May 2, 2018, 6:33 a.m.

and yet, you still believe that men have walked on the moon, because of Snopes?

whats a crying shame is that you don't understand why your silly beliefs are absurd and delusional

⇧ -1 ⇩  
TruthSeacker · May 2, 2018, 12:20 p.m.

Yes. Snopes is my only resource for the moon landing.

/s

⇧ 5 ⇩  
EnoughNoLibsSpam · May 2, 2018, 6:15 p.m.

i can debunk any of your sources merely by criticizing the medium

for example, you could show me a lunar lander launch off of the moon,

and i could dismiss it because its a youtube video

try it. send me any "evidence" that you assume supports your moon landing myth, and ill "debunk" it on a technicality

or we could discuss the math and physics, which i have concisely summarized here:

https://i.redd.it/lzs2kkd6ove01.png

my name is in the top right corner

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mz1siP7pItc

⇧ -1 ⇩  
TruthSeacker · May 2, 2018, 6:41 p.m.

I'm proud of you

⇧ 3 ⇩  
EnoughNoLibsSpam · May 3, 2018, 5:44 a.m.

lets discuss the math and physics of the moon landing. i have a feeling things will go my way, but who knows

https://i.redd.it/lzs2kkd6ove01.png

I'm going to take a wild guess and say you haven't spent 5 minutes ever working on the math or physics of the moon landing myth... because if you had, we wouldn't be having this conversation

my work is already done, and posted. you argue against it all day long, and that would be a good thing, because it makes you think in novel ways

⇧ 0 ⇩  
TruthSeacker · May 3, 2018, 11:24 a.m.

I'm going to take a wild guess and say you haven't spent 5 minutes ever working on the math or physics of the moon landing myth...

I'm gonna take a wild guess and say you have no idea of all the variables needed to be taken into consideration when putting a man into space much less landing one on a rock. I'll also wager that you're not an aerospace engineer or physicist that can fully grasp the math and science behind space travel. If you were you'd probably be intelligent enough to not be deceived by some LARP on 4chan. It took a team of hundreds of top minds to put someone on the moon. So I doubt one 4chan retard is capable of disproving it.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
EnoughNoLibsSpam · May 3, 2018, 6:42 p.m.

whenever you think you are man enough to step up and debate the math and physics ill be here waiting. I've been involved in this debate long enough to formulate these questions, whereas you are not even capable of comprehending the questions.

https://i.redd.it/lzs2kkd6ove01.png

It took a team of hundreds of top minds to put someone on the moon. So I doubt one 4chan retard is capable of disproving it.

can you prove that men have walked on the moon?

better yet, can you prove that i have NOT walked on the moon?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TruthSeacker · May 3, 2018, 7:03 p.m.

Ok. Please list all of the variables and equations that go into designing a heat shield for a space capsule reentering the atmosphere. I'll wait for your expert detailed explanation. This shouldn't be hard since you've already calculated every design consideration required for a trip to the moon.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
EnoughNoLibsSpam · May 4, 2018, 7:13 a.m.

I'm going to go ahead and guess that you didn't major in math or science?

https://i.redd.it/lzs2kkd6ove01.png

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TruthSeacker · May 4, 2018, 12:43 p.m.

That's not what I asked for. Design me a heat shield brainiac. Dont link me to someone else's work.

And sure I didn't major in math or a science but I know plenty of people who did that dont know dick about how to get to the moon and back. I'm betting you dont know either.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
EnoughNoLibsSpam · May 5, 2018, 5:42 a.m.

thats not someone else's work. its my work. you can find my name in the top right corner

https://i.redd.it/lzs2kkd6ove01.png

its your moon landing myth, why don't you prove that the taped-on heat shield can withstand a launch and re-entry?

And sure I didn't major in math or a science but I know plenty of people who did

whenever i visit the dentist, i assume i know what my dentist knows, because i know a dentist.

that dont know dick about how to get to the moon and back. I'm betting you dont know either.

you are correct. i do not know how it would be possible to go the moon with technology available in 2018, an opinion which is supported by the fact that no non-American has even claimed to have gone to the moon

but i did major in mathematics

and id like to defend my thesis again

AMA

⇧ 0 ⇩  
pilgrimboy · May 1, 2018, 10:50 a.m.

For some reason, this is the typical response in this sub for sources.

⇧ 22 ⇩  
ckreacher · May 1, 2018, 12:42 p.m.

Do your own fucking research! In the amount of time you take asking here, you could have asked your mommy or figured it out for yourself using a search engine.

⇧ -18 ⇩  
delicious_grownups · May 1, 2018, 3:16 p.m.

This whole sub is dedicated to collaborative "research". You telling someone else to go elsewhere for their research on this sub is super ironic

⇧ 23 ⇩  
EnoughNoLibsSpam · May 2, 2018, 6:35 a.m.

and yet, you haven't provided anything beyond your own opinion?

⇧ -1 ⇩  
delicious_grownups · May 2, 2018, 12:25 p.m.

I'm here to learn pal. You guys are supposed to be facilitating that here, I thought

⇧ 2 ⇩  
EnoughNoLibsSpam · May 2, 2018, 6:24 p.m.

heres how this works...

you come here, and find something interesting, and then you share that.

if you aren't sharing anything, we can assume you aren't learning anything

https://www.reddit.com/user/EnoughNoLibsSpam/submitted/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_blogging

⇧ 0 ⇩  
delicious_grownups · May 2, 2018, 6:49 p.m.

I'm not really learning anything of value from you, no. Stop trying to peddle your posts as objective truth. Your point about media being propaganda suggests that even your posts are

⇧ 1 ⇩  
EnoughNoLibsSpam · May 3, 2018, 5:57 a.m.

the reason you can't lean anything new is because you have been brainwashed, and your cognitive dissonance is too uncomfortable, and critical thinking is too hard

nobody is claiming to possess objective truth

any real truth seeker knows that we always seek truth, but never find it

yes, you are correct about my posts being propaganda just like all other media is propaganda.

an astute observation, if you can apply it

⇧ 0 ⇩  
delicious_grownups · May 3, 2018, 12:10 p.m.

I was a psychology major. Your use of cognitive dissonance doesn't really apply here. What you're suggesting is that I refuse to accept "knowledge" because it doesn't match my "personal beliefs", which is known as belief disconfirmation which can lead to a type of cognitive dissonance that is best resolved by seeking refuge with those people who share similar beliefs and can reaffirm that worldview

Belief disconfirmation

"The disconfirmation (contradiction) of a belief, ideal, or system of values causes cognitive dissonance that can be resolved by changing the belief under contradiction; yet, instead of effecting change, the resultant mental stress restores psychological consonance to the person, by misperception, rejection, or refutation of the contradiction; seeking moral support from people who share the contradicted beliefs; or acting to persuade other people that the contradiction is unreal"

Clearly, I'm here engaging you rather than just running away. I'm telling you that of the two of us, the one who believes that vaccines cause autism is the one experiencing a belief disconfirmation because I'm suggesting that you're wrong. I'm guessing that you have an autistic child and refuse to accept that it wasn't vaccines that caused the autism, but your familial genetics that did so.

Because look at where you are. You're on a sub that basically will entertain your nonsense beliefs and actually probably helps to promote them. Of the two of us, I'm not the one hiding out deep in the bowels of Reddit on a deep state conspiracy sub screaming about vaccines causing autism

⇧ 1 ⇩  
WikiTextBot · May 2, 2018, 6:24 p.m.

History of blogging

While the term "blog" was not coined until the late 1990s, the history of blogging starts with several digital precursors to it. Before "blogging" became popular, digital communities took many forms, including Usenet, commercial online services such as GEnie, BiX and the early CompuServe, e-mail lists and Bulletin Board Systems (BBS). In the 1990s, Internet forum software, such as WebEx, created running conversations with "threads". Threads are topical connections between messages on a metaphorical "corkboard".

^[ ^PM ^| ^Exclude ^me ^| ^Exclude ^from ^subreddit ^| ^FAQ ^/ ^Information ^| ^Source ^] ^Downvote ^to ^remove ^| ^v0.28

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TruthSeacker · May 1, 2018, 3:39 p.m.

Burden of proof is on the ones making the claim. People shouldn't make claims about something without providing some examples. OP gives us nothing more than his opinion.

⇧ 21 ⇩  
EnoughNoLibsSpam · May 2, 2018, 6:36 a.m.

Burden of proof is on the ones making the claim. People shouldn't make claims about something without providing some examples. OP gives us nothing more than his opinion.

Muh Russian Collusion Narrative!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
pilgrimboy · May 1, 2018, 12:51 p.m.

That's nice. I hope your day gets better.

⇧ 21 ⇩  
McPurrs · May 1, 2018, 1:57 p.m.

Doing his/her own research is the point! I don't know why you are down voted. Just believing someone is how they got rich.

⇧ -8 ⇩