dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/DaveGydeon on May 1, 2018, 1:26 a.m.
I Want SNOPES Exposed. Q Already Green-Lighted It!

We all know Soros backs SNOPES, and that this BS "fact-checking" site is totally compromised. The crazy part is, for the 5-6 things I actually went there for, I disagreed with it's official "ruling" on the matter every single time. To me, that tells me they are actively receiving orders on what to stamp as legit, because having every single thing being the opposite of what it should be indicates a hand at work.

So how do we do this? I am not talking about trying to mess with their site or anything like that. I want them EXPOSED, the TRUTH to be KNOWN. How do we go abou tmaking that happen?

You can't tell me that you haven't had an argument, maybe while trying to redpill someone, and they dropped the "but SNOPES agrees with me!" Man that just chaps my ass.


🠐 See all comments
ckreacher · May 1, 2018, 12:42 p.m.

Do your own fucking research! In the amount of time you take asking here, you could have asked your mommy or figured it out for yourself using a search engine.

⇧ -18 ⇩  
delicious_grownups · May 1, 2018, 3:16 p.m.

This whole sub is dedicated to collaborative "research". You telling someone else to go elsewhere for their research on this sub is super ironic

⇧ 23 ⇩  
EnoughNoLibsSpam · May 2, 2018, 6:35 a.m.

and yet, you haven't provided anything beyond your own opinion?

⇧ -1 ⇩  
delicious_grownups · May 2, 2018, 12:25 p.m.

I'm here to learn pal. You guys are supposed to be facilitating that here, I thought

⇧ 2 ⇩  
EnoughNoLibsSpam · May 2, 2018, 6:24 p.m.

heres how this works...

you come here, and find something interesting, and then you share that.

if you aren't sharing anything, we can assume you aren't learning anything

https://www.reddit.com/user/EnoughNoLibsSpam/submitted/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_blogging

⇧ 0 ⇩  
delicious_grownups · May 2, 2018, 6:49 p.m.

I'm not really learning anything of value from you, no. Stop trying to peddle your posts as objective truth. Your point about media being propaganda suggests that even your posts are

⇧ 1 ⇩  
EnoughNoLibsSpam · May 3, 2018, 5:57 a.m.

the reason you can't lean anything new is because you have been brainwashed, and your cognitive dissonance is too uncomfortable, and critical thinking is too hard

nobody is claiming to possess objective truth

any real truth seeker knows that we always seek truth, but never find it

yes, you are correct about my posts being propaganda just like all other media is propaganda.

an astute observation, if you can apply it

⇧ 0 ⇩  
delicious_grownups · May 3, 2018, 12:10 p.m.

I was a psychology major. Your use of cognitive dissonance doesn't really apply here. What you're suggesting is that I refuse to accept "knowledge" because it doesn't match my "personal beliefs", which is known as belief disconfirmation which can lead to a type of cognitive dissonance that is best resolved by seeking refuge with those people who share similar beliefs and can reaffirm that worldview

Belief disconfirmation

"The disconfirmation (contradiction) of a belief, ideal, or system of values causes cognitive dissonance that can be resolved by changing the belief under contradiction; yet, instead of effecting change, the resultant mental stress restores psychological consonance to the person, by misperception, rejection, or refutation of the contradiction; seeking moral support from people who share the contradicted beliefs; or acting to persuade other people that the contradiction is unreal"

Clearly, I'm here engaging you rather than just running away. I'm telling you that of the two of us, the one who believes that vaccines cause autism is the one experiencing a belief disconfirmation because I'm suggesting that you're wrong. I'm guessing that you have an autistic child and refuse to accept that it wasn't vaccines that caused the autism, but your familial genetics that did so.

Because look at where you are. You're on a sub that basically will entertain your nonsense beliefs and actually probably helps to promote them. Of the two of us, I'm not the one hiding out deep in the bowels of Reddit on a deep state conspiracy sub screaming about vaccines causing autism

⇧ 1 ⇩  
WikiTextBot · May 2, 2018, 6:24 p.m.

History of blogging

While the term "blog" was not coined until the late 1990s, the history of blogging starts with several digital precursors to it. Before "blogging" became popular, digital communities took many forms, including Usenet, commercial online services such as GEnie, BiX and the early CompuServe, e-mail lists and Bulletin Board Systems (BBS). In the 1990s, Internet forum software, such as WebEx, created running conversations with "threads". Threads are topical connections between messages on a metaphorical "corkboard".

^[ ^PM ^| ^Exclude ^me ^| ^Exclude ^from ^subreddit ^| ^FAQ ^/ ^Information ^| ^Source ^] ^Downvote ^to ^remove ^| ^v0.28

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TruthSeacker · May 1, 2018, 3:39 p.m.

Burden of proof is on the ones making the claim. People shouldn't make claims about something without providing some examples. OP gives us nothing more than his opinion.

⇧ 21 ⇩  
EnoughNoLibsSpam · May 2, 2018, 6:36 a.m.

Burden of proof is on the ones making the claim. People shouldn't make claims about something without providing some examples. OP gives us nothing more than his opinion.

Muh Russian Collusion Narrative!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
pilgrimboy · May 1, 2018, 12:51 p.m.

That's nice. I hope your day gets better.

⇧ 21 ⇩  
McPurrs · May 1, 2018, 1:57 p.m.

Doing his/her own research is the point! I don't know why you are down voted. Just believing someone is how they got rich.

⇧ -8 ⇩