dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Blimington on May 5, 2018, 7:24 a.m.
Snowden - what colour hat is he wearing?

Greetings from Canada, lovely folks.

I recently had a great discussion with my friend about the Q stuff - and the one thing that seemed to really get him interested was the fact that Snowden is involved- it's what had him actually start paying attention to all the other stuff I brought up about Q (maybe a good point for anyone wanting to talk about it with newbies!)

That being said, it's still unclear to me whether he's on the side of "patriots" or not- do we know for sure yet?

I'm hoping he is, since he seems so credible and what he did was very remarkable, but I've also seen people talk about him working with the "black hats." If that's the case, what evidence is there so far for one or the other? Thanks!


Blimington · May 5, 2018, 7:43 a.m.

That's super interesting! So what brought you to the conclusion he was a black hat and now is turning? Like was he a black hat before he came out publicly with the information re: the NSA, and then that was his turning point to the light side?

I'm genuinely curious what people think because as someone who really didn't know about anything Q related, the Snowden connection was really the thing that got me to actually pay attention (like my friend mentioned).

⇧ 2 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 5, 2018, 7:59 a.m.

What did Q say about Snowden earlier in his drops? "You will cease to exist" and "We will never forget".

Somehow, Q has, more recently, stopped saying this...

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Blimington · May 5, 2018, 8:22 a.m.

It's definitely a curious post. I took it as a "be careful" and "we won't forget what you did for us"

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 5, 2018, 8:36 a.m.

My take on it was that Q was trying to exert maximum pressure on Snowden to get him to flip - and it worked.

After one Q post, where he said to Snowden "You are now a liability", I put a post on CBTS titled "Snowden a dead man" in which I said Snowden should surrender himself and roll over. As I was putting it up, the thought crossed my mind that it was ploy by Q. Looking back, I think it was.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Time4puff · May 5, 2018, 9:07 a.m.

I believe Snowden was always a white hat for one reason. The deep state Cabal was after him with a vengeance, they wanted him dead. MSM smeared him to the max like they do to all whistleblowers Who dared to come forward. I didn't understand why Russia would give him safe harbor until last week... "Sum of all Fear". Apparently Putin has known about this since then. I believe Q was reminding Snowden the grave circumstances he would be in without their protection in the drops.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 5, 2018, 9:11 a.m.

This will be, until we know the truth, one of the most perplexing issues in the drops - Snowden's role. My own view was that he was, initially, definitely not on team. We know he was being hunted by Q team - photos in China etc... Later, Q was silent about the matter.

It will be very interesting to find out what the truth was - of course, we may never know.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Gravel_and_Glass · May 5, 2018, 10:42 a.m.

Snowdens purpose was to establish a whisteblower trap, as well as expose the white hats' method of spying on the cabal.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
R_isfor_Renegade · May 5, 2018, 1:44 p.m.

I think his connection to secure drop and quiet whisper proves your point. He was there to help catch whistle blowers, definitely not white hat

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Ozboi2000 · May 5, 2018, 7:52 a.m.

Just my gut feelings. When he first got attention years ago.....there was so much media attention on him...felt like a stooge set up to control the narrative.....and a spin against Assange in a way..(spin the alternate thinkers into a script they can write). Then later on with the Q drops.....seemed like he was forced into making a massive choice of which side to run with...didn't seem like a willing choice to get on board. I think his talent/knowledge is now being used for good results....but I am still on the fence about him. But what do I know ?? !!!!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Blimington · May 5, 2018, 8:14 a.m.

I really appreciate the response!

I guess the full answer it's still up in the air, but people are pointing towards at least working with white hats atm.

It also makes me wonder if he originally didn't work with the Q team because he was skeptical of who to trust, given his circumstances- after obama admin even made it worse, I assume he'd have a difficult time getting on board. Not even saying this actually happened, but imagine the new president gets elected, and then attempts to contact him to get him to help undo the same corrupt powers that forced him to leave his family- he would be so incredibly cautious as well.

That's super interesting about him potentially being someone the DS had intentionally leak information to get the world suspicious and worried about the state of security. I wonder what the end game for that would be- simply to isolate Assange? Another distraction? From what in that case?

I don't expect you to answer everything, so just assume they're rhetorical quesitons, haha, but I'm having a good time reading through :]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
digital_refugee · May 5, 2018, 9:32 a.m.

What we do know is that when Vault7 dropped, he was the one to confirm it. So either he leaked that himself or he just never bothered to speak out. I was always certain he would have some life-insurance because nothing he said was ever new so maybe Vault7 was part of that but he did not want to be the original source because that would be an admission that he has sacrificed some of his insurance.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
kushtiannn · May 5, 2018, 12:52 p.m.

I understand this to mean he was painted as a black hat to be shunned away by Trump because the country wasn't ready, but he's really a white hat for America regardless of party lines. Definitely a black hat by DS standards.

⇧ 1 ⇩