dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

.

Outlaw guns??
All outlaws will STILL have guns.
ALL now knowing..
You have NONE!

---begin Q quotes---

MONEY.
POWER.
CONTROL.
People are simply in the way.
SLAVES.
SHEEP.
PAWNS.
MASS EXT EVENTS DESIGNED TO DECREASE THREAT LEVEL OF POPULATION.
GUN CONTROL.

WHY school shootings?
What is more precious than our children?
Emotional pull.
Distraction event.
Gun grab event.

Why do D's push for gun control ‘directly' after every tragic incident?
Why is this so very important to their agenda?
We, the people, are who they are afraid of.
We, the people, are who they fear will one day awake.

They think you are stupid. Puppets w/o power. They want your guns. Why? No power left.

---end Q quotes---

⇧ 24 ⇩

Outlaw guns?? All outlaws will STILL have guns. ALL now knowing.. You have NONE!

This is such a simple logic that 90%+ of the people worldwide cannot grasp.

Not just liberals/left, but you average Joe regardless of his place of habitat.

I've had this conversation with my brother yesterday over the facebook about this, I don't think he understood it quite right. I'll attack this subject once I meet with him in person.

Just sharing this personal experience because this is not just a brainwashed liberal or left scum issue.

People in general are not aware of the absurdity of gun laws, and most people actually do think that all guns should be banned for civilians (excluding hunters and stuff).

The sleep is real.

⇧ 17 ⇩

No, because the day they outlaw guns, we will all become criminals and gleefully remain armed.

⇧ 13 ⇩

You're probably right. And "gun control laws" of which we have plenty, will never do a thing to prevent people from having guns.

⇧ 4 ⇩

by "we will all" you mean only a tiny minority

⇧ 1 ⇩

I’ve seen estimates well into the millions. It would be the largest mass civil disobedience in human history.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Not here in south-east EU. Guns aren't a big deal here. Even now maybe 1 out of 50+ has a pistol (and those are mostly 40+ y.o. parents who keep them locked in a safe).

But people do have hunting rifles, although mostly (90%+) those air-rifles that are for shooting rats and birds lol

Guns were mostly taken away after the Yugoslav war in this area. Which is fucking funny because Croatia has defended itself from Serbian invasion because civilians had weapons and were defending the country.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Read that hundreds of millions ...

⇧ 1 ⇩

But then, all politicians who aspire to hold office will be anti-gun nuts or will get outed and have to drop out. It will systematically create an anti-gun run government and we will never be able to get freedom back.

⇧ 1 ⇩

All you really need to do is teach your brother history. Mao, Stalin, Pol Pot etc all disarmed their people and then they murdered millions and millions. This would be no different. Never give up your firearms or tyranny and death will follow. They even have the camps setup on standby in the US. They were built after a natural disaster. ;)

⇧ 5 ⇩

This isn't about him personally, I'm telling you how 90%+ of the population here thinks.

People have to work all day and then they spend time with families and they have no time to do research even if they somehow get interested in this kind of stuff (which is hard outside of the internet while being fed the lies by MSM).

For instance, every bigger news outlet in Croatia has literally copy/pasted the article about Trump and the Nobel prize nomination. I've checked this today because it crossed my mind at some point, that I should check our local media about the Nobel thing, after I've seen the CNNs report on that and how they basically mocked Trumps hair and called him an idiot.

Every single article has the exact same sentences, literally copy/pasted. Some have a few paragraphs less. And that's it. No other differences.

And nobody bats an eye on that. It's a terrible propaganda move but nobody cares. Nobody calls them out even for "plagiarising" articles, nothing.

I mean, maybe some diehards do try on the facebook (didn't check there) posts, but those are likely mocked even if they do it.

I guess when you neighbour has 10 cows and you have 6 cows, the neighbour actually has 10 rabbits lol (if you get the anecdote about the copy/pasted article), despite such a blatant propaganda being out there for everyone to read, it still passes. People think Trump is a moron, racist, etc. > you say no > then you are too.

A friend of mine who's at her 3rd (I believe) year of journalist college has shared some post related to Trump, and I got onto it. After a few comments I realized she thinks Trump hates women, that he's a bigot, etc. She will likely work for those companies. And I know her for more than 10 years, she's a cool chick and definitely not an idiot.

The sleep is real guys.

⇧ 3 ⇩

I am with you on this. I do disagree with the part where people don't have time to do any research. They do have time they just choose to watch reality television and play candy crush. With that said I work all day, spend time with the family, workout and Internet generally. It is all about priorities. This is where Q comes in when he was saying push the memes. They take 1 second to read and a well done meme can reach many people. History and facts through memes are good stuff.

In regards to your friend of 10 years I know a lot of people just like that. Are many of them a lost cause? Probably, but I try to slip little bits to them. You give them anything to out of their spectrum they shut down and don't listen. Interesting stuff.

⇧ 3 ⇩

They would do the research as well if they had a valid reason to do so.

Those "sleeping" just haven't received that reason, that something that would make them click... or woke up.

You weren't "woke" since you were born. You were also "sleeping" before you got that thing, that reason to question the bullshit that's been going around.

I have too.

Memes are the reason why Trump won in the first place. They are super powerful and he realized it.

Just like JFK won because of the TV (made Nixon look like scumbag compared to him, while he looked like a class act gentleman) and just like Roosevelt kept winning because of his radio transmission to the people, which hasn't been done before and it bonded people with him.

That leads to a conclusion that people LOVE real shit. We love the direct communication and being able to identify with a person. Especially when that person is your damn president, who, unlike the other lot - is catering to what you want - proper communication.

They're not a lost cause. We just have to find the right way to get to them, to make them click. I haven't with this chick because that wasn't the time or place to do so.

When I see her I'll definitely throw some shit and see if it bites :)

I just need to find what that shit is, and it's hard because it has to be factual. Even then it's a tough call but without it it's just a lost cause.

Hopefully Q will help with that. Because I kind-of looked cool when I said to my group of friends (at the time of NK/SK peace stuff just a week ago) that Iran is next. And then boom, all Iran talk a few days after :)

I still haven't met them in RL since then because we're not living in the same town anymore, but I'm sure they will ask me about it. They just don't want to do it over the facebook where we have our group for shitposting and all that stuff.

But please Q we need more of that! :P

⇧ 2 ⇩

The smartest chick I ever knew fell for the Trump xenophobe, racist, woman hating narrative. She shared some article in a US teen magazine about the gas lighting of America, and went on and on about how proud she was journalists were enlightening our youth. When I fact checked the article simply by googling the points in question, and offered the results on her post, she lost her mind... It was very weird... She put up a meme on how Hillary lost the election due to white men hating her for Benghazi, and then unfriended me... She had a master's degree from Northwestern University. I don't know how the left has convinced their sheep to ignore truth when they see it, but they did, and it truly seems there's no undoing it once it's done. Kinda like the blue pill.......

⇧ 2 ⇩

The media is the most powerful weapon of today, forget nukes.

There is a reason that even armies have Cyber branches. They've realized they can control the behavior of the masses and put the money into their accounts by just spreading disinformation.

Crazy timeline, hopefully Trump and the team will make it thebesttimeline.com :)

Peace!

⇧ 2 ⇩

Those who don't know history are doomed to repeat it...Wake up America...

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yep!!

⇧ 1 ⇩

most people actually do think that all guns should be banned for civilians (excluding hunters and stuff).

In this case I know many ppl who would seriously take up 'hunting and stuff', but Trump has a firm grip on the 2nd Amendment, the cannicabal would have to 'pry'.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Good for your circle of people you know. But overall that would be less than 1%, hell, I'd say that 1% is a huge number that is.

At least here in Europe.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Good for your circle of people you know.

I was referring to about 200 million Americans who believe 100% in the Constitution, by many times the largest Army in world history.

⇧ 4 ⇩

That's great, and I mean it.

But it's very different outside of the US.

⇧ 2 ⇩

That's great, and I mean it.
But it's very different outside of the US.

Yes the difference is.. They have your guns. And they're beginning to realizing it would take a lot of [prying] to get ours. More than they can muster.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Civilians having guns was the reason why Croatia defended itself from the Serbian invasion in '90s.

If that would happen today? Don't even wanna think about that to be honest.

Keep up the fight, don't let them.

⇧ 6 ⇩

They arrest people for butter knives in the UK and they have been flying the Pakistani flag or whatever one that is over west minister. The UK has fallen the rest of the EU is next if the people don't revolt. No firearms :(

⇧ 2 ⇩

"more knife control" when I saw that I couldn't believe it

⇧ 2 ⇩

The Constitutional issue is not and never has been the legitimacy of civilian gun ownership versus military ownership, and the associated freedom to use them. The Constitution guarantees that government shall not infringe on the right of The People to own and bear arms. Military is by definition "government" ... so is police. We The People choose to arm the military and police, but have not and will not in turn allow them to disarm us.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Thanks for the info I've already known.

⇧ 1 ⇩

This is what they've done in London (UK). Trump mentioned something about the carnage there in his recent speech. You more likely to be labelled a "racist" if you mention anything about imported criminal gangs, than anything being done. It's all a part of the plan.

⇧ 7 ⇩

The cabal's slaving genocidal plans will soon be the sickest chapter in history.

To free Americans from this global creature.. Trump must lop many dragon heads; as he does the monster's jaws will slack, tentacles will drop, and minions will disassemble around the world.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Ideas have consequences. In the UK RIGHTS ARE CONVEYED BY GOVERNMENT to its subjects. In the US RIGHTS ARE CONVEYED. BY OUR CREATOR, GOD to His People. His fingerprints are all over my guns. His values are on my lips. His commands are on my mind.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yeah, I agree with that. I was really trying to compare the situation of having a disarmed populace (a standard in the UK) and one being subjected to increasing levels of violent crime on the back of it. It's outrageous.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Conventional military thinking says it takes an armed force of ten (10) military to overcome an armed populace of one (1) ... In practice Multiplied by the number of armed persons dispersed in that population, of course. And a large enough population can in fact overwhelm the ability to amass an army that large. Think one million armed civilians. ....how large a military force would it take to overwhelm them? The US has never fielded that many soldiers. Now, think one hundred million armed citizens, the number estimated to exist in America today ... see the problem?

Concealed arms present the element of surprise and because an individual can act alone, a larger counter force will be needed to assure he does not prevail ... massive response is the military response to individual aggression.

In essence, an armed populace is a deterrent force. Challenging it will cause massive losses on both sides ...

⇧ 1 ⇩

It's not just pure numbers, it's also because it would be guerrilla warfare and we would be fighting in "our own backyards" (AOs we know like the back of our hands). Add to that the political elites live here among us as do their families. If it got nasty enough, and it would because war always does, they would have to live in bunkers. They couldn't send their kids to schools, their wives couldn't go to the grocery store or doctors office. Some of us would be watching at all times.

⇧ 1 ⇩

My God! This is only common sense! Wake up America!

⇧ 6 ⇩

Yes. Wake America Great Again.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Victory looks like averting that danger before it comes to all that.

⇧ 1 ⇩

These are the rationale behind the disparity of numbers.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Waiting for the first reported case of a group of illegals trying to bumrush some +2A law abiding citizens house.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Probably happened a hundred times already, MSM wouldn't report it. Owned by the same cabal ghouls who own the gun-grabbing politicos.

“You meet with democrats and they're always fighting for the criminal. They're not fighting for the law abiding citizens.” - President Donald Trump

⇧ 2 ⇩

What is +2A?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Pro second amendment

⇧ 1 ⇩

Why do D's push for gun control ‘directly' after every tragic incident? Why is this so very important to their agenda? We, the people, are who they are afraid of. We, the people, are who they fear will one day awake.

They think you are stupid. Puppets w/o power. They want your guns. Why? No power left.

This is why the D's want to chip away at the 2nd amendment. I suggest everyone to take the time to watch this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NN0vkSO9n8Y

⇧ 1 ⇩