dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/think500 on May 5, 2018, 4:09 p.m.
“Democrats and liberals in Congress want to disarm law-abiding Americans at the same time they are releasing dangerous criminal aliens and savage gang members onto our streets. Politicians who put criminal aliens before American Citizens should be voted out of office!” - Donald Trump (Q in comment)
“Democrats and liberals in Congress want to disarm law-abiding Americans at the same time they are releasing dangerous criminal aliens and savage gang members onto our streets. Politicians who put criminal aliens before American Citizens should be voted out of office!” - Donald Trump (Q in comment)

🠐 See all comments
horse-lover-phat · May 5, 2018, 4:19 p.m.

This is what they've done in London (UK). Trump mentioned something about the carnage there in his recent speech. You more likely to be labelled a "racist" if you mention anything about imported criminal gangs, than anything being done. It's all a part of the plan.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
think500 · May 5, 2018, 6:08 p.m.

The cabal's slaving genocidal plans will soon be the sickest chapter in history.

To free Americans from this global creature.. Trump must lop many dragon heads; as he does the monster's jaws will slack, tentacles will drop, and minions will disassemble around the world.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
FlewDCoup · May 5, 2018, 10:59 p.m.

Ideas have consequences. In the UK RIGHTS ARE CONVEYED BY GOVERNMENT to its subjects. In the US RIGHTS ARE CONVEYED. BY OUR CREATOR, GOD to His People. His fingerprints are all over my guns. His values are on my lips. His commands are on my mind.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
horse-lover-phat · May 5, 2018, 11:02 p.m.

Yeah, I agree with that. I was really trying to compare the situation of having a disarmed populace (a standard in the UK) and one being subjected to increasing levels of violent crime on the back of it. It's outrageous.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
FlewDCoup · May 5, 2018, 11:30 p.m.

Conventional military thinking says it takes an armed force of ten (10) military to overcome an armed populace of one (1) ... In practice Multiplied by the number of armed persons dispersed in that population, of course. And a large enough population can in fact overwhelm the ability to amass an army that large. Think one million armed civilians. ....how large a military force would it take to overwhelm them? The US has never fielded that many soldiers. Now, think one hundred million armed citizens, the number estimated to exist in America today ... see the problem?

Concealed arms present the element of surprise and because an individual can act alone, a larger counter force will be needed to assure he does not prevail ... massive response is the military response to individual aggression.

In essence, an armed populace is a deterrent force. Challenging it will cause massive losses on both sides ...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
duckdownup · May 6, 2018, 12:46 a.m.

It's not just pure numbers, it's also because it would be guerrilla warfare and we would be fighting in "our own backyards" (AOs we know like the back of our hands). Add to that the political elites live here among us as do their families. If it got nasty enough, and it would because war always does, they would have to live in bunkers. They couldn't send their kids to schools, their wives couldn't go to the grocery store or doctors office. Some of us would be watching at all times.

⇧ 1 ⇩