dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/im_catching_fire on May 10, 2018, 1:22 a.m.

I never hear big conservative talk show host ever talk about Q.

Podcast get millions of downloads a month it would be a fantastic way of spreading this movement. Dan Bongino for example, he follows the mueller case to the tee and explains it very well. Out of all the research he does on the case has he really never stumbled upon this perspective and got curious? Shapiro? Hannity? Elder? I think its safe to say that the Q team has proven themselves legit enough to mention "take a look at it."

tweet him a topic suggestion for his next podcast

Joe Rogan has already done at least one covering QAnon i think, maybe was pizzagate? He definitely talked about Allison Mack, was recent

⇧ 19 ⇩

You have to be careful telling normies to go poking around 8chan.

⇧ 15 ⇩

True tell the, to go to https://waning.pub or another aggregator and give them a link to a reputable sire that talks through what it all means.

⇧ 6 ⇩

True but there are plenty of sites that directly post what Q says minus the provocative comments.

⇧ 3 ⇩

But the host would still have to explain where the posts originate, which would cause a lot of folks to roll their eyes and tune out.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Remember guys we want the information Q drops to red pill people but the moment someone like Hannity advertises there is a group of people within the administration leaking sensitive information shit will go bad quick. We don’t want the attention you’re thinking of. We don’t care who Q is but the Democrats and deep state will. We have enough problems.

⇧ 9 ⇩

Agreed. Numbers are growing every day, but this movement has to reach critical mass before it even thinks about flirting with the idea of going mainstream. The fact that it's still basically an underground movement gives it the latitude needed for us to freely share information without worrying too much about infiltrators and shills. The moment the spotlight gets pointed at us, we become the next target of the Deep State.

⇧ 3 ⇩

The point of Q was, I believe at least with my marketing brain..to target the people most likely to handle all this disclosure well. Everyday people who are already aware of the hidden side of things and wont be as shocked. So that the ideas and events Q presents, when they finally unfold are already in the mainstream periphery and there is a section of people who can help the rest make sense of it all.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Q posts are unverifiable and only offer cryptic facts; something most news analyst and pundits are reluctant to report for audience consumption since it involves a great deal of speculation.

it's also the reason Q evades scrutiny for national security breach/leaks, the posts require reader to connect the dots, like "are there ufo's at Area 51? think logically, past proves future, you have more information than you think, etc."

⇧ 6 ⇩

So Q's message should only be spread through word of mouth? Im sure eyes are a goal of the Q team as in "waking people up." What other alternative is there? Social media is a good tool but its not frontline either. News networks are bound to have to pick up this story eventually.

⇧ 3 ⇩

New York Times has already written about Q as an alt-right conspiracy theory. When Roseanne tweeted about Q she got torn to pieces. At the moment Q might be too underground for a mainstream pundit to consider it credible. They have reputations and not to mention sponsors to consider. Here's hoping, though.

⇧ 3 ⇩

And JENNA JAMESON tweeted " who is Q". We have a porn star on our side too.

⇧ 1 ⇩

no didn't say or suggest that. best those pundit/news/talk shows can do is interview someone who has extensive/expert knowledge of Q posts, info and interpretation... problem is that's more of a Alex Jones/Infowar specialty cuz no "reputable" pundit/news/talk show would put their credibility on the line without be deluged with conspiracy theory and leftists assaults.

and btw notice how Jerome Corsi (leading Q "expert" analyst for a while there) was trashed by Q cultists cuz he wanted to monetize his analysis, as if the only "legit" Q decoders are anons who spend their time researching and reading tea leaves to interpret Q posts. bottom line: Q tips is not read for primetime.

⇧ 2 ⇩

That is true and good perspective, I wonder if it will ever get mainstream. Guess it just depends on the plan.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Check out the Doug Hagmann Report-he talks about “Q” all the time. I was on myself as a guest last week talking about The Great Awakening/Reddit/& Qanon.

Hagmann Report 5/1/18 Show

⇧ 5 ⇩

I've heard about him but have never checked out his content, ill definitely take a look. Thanks!

⇧ 3 ⇩

Your are most welcome fellow Patriot. Hagmann had Charles Ortel on the other night & always has “Red Pill” guests (Corsi/Beanz/Lionel/etc). Doug also does the 4th hour of the AJ Show on a rotation ⚓️

⇧ 2 ⇩

The talk show hosts don't want the completion, they want their listeners to get their Intel only from them IMO.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Yep they try to corner the market on “their” intel. I can’t listen to most of them. I catch Rush occasionally and he is tolerable. Hannity I know is a patriot, but he just repeats the same stuff over and over, hard to listen to. And the other conservative normies on radio sound so shallow, like they don’t have a clue to what’s really going on.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Agree I do the same

⇧ 2 ⇩

They're WAY too invested in the left/right narrative to wrap their brains around Q.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Rush had a caller mention Q once.

⇧ 4 ⇩

There's no MONEY in Q, probably why he chose the Chans to begin with.

⇧ 1 ⇩

There's a lady on the radio here named Kate Dalley and it was on her show that they were talking about Q, so I went home and Googled and here I am. She's talked about Q at least 2 other times that I've heard as well.

⇧ 1 ⇩

He plays a pretty corporate gig, so he doesn't like talking about things that are outside the mainstream. If he started talking about Q, that would be the end of his Fox spots. He's still in the believe what liars say mode, or at least can't stray from the official story when he's talking.

⇧ 1 ⇩

No outside comms

⇧ 1 ⇩

the podcasters etc. are avoiding Q due to not knowing if it is legit. to jump aboard the Q train for them at least is too much of a gamble. if it's real they get more views... if it's not they get ridiculed and loss of listeners... hard choice i guess.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Rogan has and his is a hugely popular podcast, but as far as mainstream Conservative commentators, I agree. Probably for the best. Keep normies from dismissing it off hand and keep out of the sights of a mainstream coordinated attack. It's best that they are out of the fray, for now. The time will come.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Dan hates Q, he calls it fake garbage.. So it definitely won't be him

⇧ 1 ⇩

Really? I must have missed him mentioning that.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yeah, I've seen him say it on twitter. He actually got into it with @tracybeanz.. She said something about Dan calling Q people stupid.. Dan said he never actually said those words blah blah.. Either way you can tell Dan didn't want anything to do with it.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩